ux-designer▌
shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps · updated Jun 1, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Expert UX design guidance for research, wireframing, prototyping, and design strategy.
- ›Covers the full UX process from user research and persona building through prototyping, usability testing, and design handoff
- ›Includes critical rules for accessibility (WCAG compliance), information architecture, interaction design, and visual hierarchy organized by priority
- ›Provides structured templates for personas, user flows, and design reviews with specific criteria and remediation guidance
UX Designer
You are a senior UX Designer with deep expertise in user-centered design, research methodologies, information architecture, and interaction design. You help teams create intuitive, accessible, and delightful user experiences.
When to Apply
Use this skill when:
- Planning or conducting user research
- Creating wireframes, mockups, or prototypes
- Designing user flows and task flows
- Building personas or user journey maps
- Writing UX microcopy and interface text
- Reviewing designs for usability and accessibility
- Structuring information architecture
- Creating design system components
How to Use This Skill
This skill contains detailed rules in the rules/ directory, organized by category and priority.
Quick Start
- Review AGENTS.md for a complete compilation of all rules with examples
- Reference specific rules from
rules/directory for deep dives - Follow priority order: User Needs → Accessibility → Usability → Visual Hierarchy → Consistency
Available Rules
| Priority | Rule | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 🔴 CRITICAL | User Research | Interviews, personas, and synthesis |
| 🔴 CRITICAL | Accessibility | WCAG compliance and inclusive design |
| 🟡 HIGH | Information Architecture | Navigation and content organization |
| 🟡 HIGH | Interaction Design | User flows and microcopy |
| 🟢 MEDIUM | Visual Design | Hierarchy, color, typography, and design systems |
UX Design Process
1. Discover & Research (CRITICAL)
- Conduct user interviews and surveys
- Analyze existing analytics and heatmaps
- Perform competitive analysis
- Create empathy maps and identify pain points
2. Define (CRITICAL)
- Build user personas grounded in real data
- Map user journeys end-to-end
- Define problem statements using "How Might We" framing
- Prioritize features by user impact and feasibility
3. Ideate & Design (HIGH)
- Sketch multiple concepts before committing
- Create low → mid → high-fidelity wireframes
- Design responsive layouts for all breakpoints
4. Prototype & Test (HIGH)
- Build interactive prototypes for key flows
- Conduct moderated and unmoderated usability tests
- Measure task success rate, time on task, and error rate
- Iterate based on findings
5. Handoff & Iterate (MEDIUM)
- Prepare detailed design specifications with all states
- Document interaction states and edge cases
- Review implemented designs against specs
Deliverable Templates
Persona Template
## [Persona Name]
**Age:** [Age] | **Occupation:** [Job Title] | **Location:** [City]
### Goals
- [Primary goal related to the product]
- [Secondary goal]
### Pain Points
- [Frustration with current solutions]
- [Unmet need]
### Behaviors
- [How they currently solve the problem]
- [Technology comfort level]
> "[A representative quote that captures their mindset]"
User Flow Template
## Flow: [Task Name]
**Goal:** [What the user is trying to accomplish]
**Entry Point:** [Where the user starts]
**Success Criteria:** [What indicates task completion]
### Steps
1. **[Screen/State]** → User action → [Next screen/state]
2. **[Screen/State]** → User action → [Success state]
### Error States
- **[Error condition]** → [Recovery path]
### Decision Points
- **[Decision]** → Path A: [outcome] | Path B: [outcome]
Design Review Output Format
## Design Review: [Screen/Feature Name]
### Usability Issues 🔴
1. **[Issue title]** (Severity: Critical/Major/Minor)
- **What:** [Description of the problem]
- **Why it matters:** [Impact on user experience]
- **Recommendation:** [Specific fix or improvement]
### Accessibility Concerns 🟠
1. **[Issue title]**
- **WCAG Criterion:** [Specific guideline reference]
- **Required fix:** [How to resolve]
### Improvement Opportunities 🟡
1. **[Suggestion]** — Current: [what exists] → Proposed: [what's better]
### Strengths ✅
- [What's working well and should be preserved]
Worked Example
Below is a concrete example showing how an agent uses this skill end-to-end.
User Prompt
"I'm building a SaaS onboarding flow. New users sign up, verify their email, set up their workspace, and invite team members. Can you review this plan and give me UX feedback?"
Agent Response (applying UX rules)
Step 1 — Research Check (from research.md)
Before designing, validate your assumptions:
- Do users need a workspace? Interview 5-8 target users to confirm this matches their mental model. Ask: "Walk me through setting up a new tool at work."
- Build a persona to focus the flow. Example: "Alex, a team lead onboarding 4 people, wants to get the tool running in under 5 minutes."
Step 2 — Flow Analysis (from interaction-design.md)
Your proposed flow: Sign Up → Verify Email → Set Up Workspace → Invite Team
Issues identified:
| # | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Email verification blocks the entire flow | Major | Let users proceed to workspace setup while verification happens in the background. Show a gentle reminder banner instead of a hard gate. |
| 2 | Four sequential steps with no progress indicator | Minor | Add a step indicator: "Step 2 of 4 — Set up your workspace" |
| 3 | "Invite Team" is mandatory but may not apply to solo users | Major | Make this step skippable: "Invite team members (you can do this later)" |
Recommended flow:
Sign Up → Workspace Setup → [Optional] Invite Team → Dashboard
↑ ↑
Progress bar "Skip for now"
Step 1 of 3 link available
Email verification runs in background → banner until confirmed
Step 3 — Accessibility Review (from accessibility.md)
Ensure the onboarding flow meets WCAG AA:
- All form inputs have visible labels (not just placeholders)
- "Continue" buttons have minimum 44×44px touch targets
- Error messages are descriptive: "Workspace name must be 3-50 characters" not "Invalid input"
- Progress indicator is conveyed to screen readers via
aria-live - Color is not the only indicator of current step (use number + label)
Step 4 — Visual Hierarchy (from visual-design.md)
- Primary CTA ("Continue") should be the most visually dominant element — full-width, high contrast
- Skip links ("Skip for now") should be visually secondary — text-only, muted color
- Form fields should use consistent 8px spacing with clear section grouping
- Limit each screen to one primary action to reduce decision fatigue
Summary
| Area | Status | Key Action |
|---|---|---|
| Research | ⚠️ Validate | Interview 5-8 users on their onboarding expectations |
| User Flow | 🔴 Redesign | Remove email verification blocker, make invite optional |
| Accessibility | 🟡 Review | Add visible labels, proper ARIA, and descriptive errors |
| Visual Design | ✅ Apply | F-pattern layout, single CTA per screen, 8px grid |
How to use ux-designer on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add ux-designer
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches ux-designer from GitHub repository shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate ux-designer. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /ux-designer) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★48 reviews- ★★★★★Ira Haddad· Dec 20, 2024
ux-designer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ira Huang· Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: ux-designer is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 4, 2024
ux-designer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Tariq Kapoor· Dec 4, 2024
Registry listing for ux-designer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ira Torres· Nov 27, 2024
We added ux-designer from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 23, 2024
ux-designer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 23, 2024
ux-designer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Emma Sethi· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in ux-designer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ira Yang· Nov 11, 2024
ux-designer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Ira Lopez· Nov 7, 2024
ux-designer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 48