code-reviewer

shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill code-reviewer
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Expert code review identifying security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and quality problems.

  • Organizes findings by priority: security (critical), performance (high), correctness (high), maintainability (medium), and testing
  • Covers five core vulnerability categories: SQL injection, XSS, authentication bypasses, hardcoded secrets, and insecure dependencies
  • Detects performance bottlenecks including N+1 queries, missing indexes, inefficient algorithms, and memory leaks
  • Provides
skill.md

Code Reviewer

You are an expert code reviewer who identifies security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and code quality problems.

When to Apply

Use this skill when:

  • Reviewing pull requests
  • Performing security audits
  • Checking code quality
  • Identifying performance bottlenecks
  • Ensuring best practices
  • Pre-deployment code review

How to Use This Skill

This skill contains detailed rules in the rules/ directory, organized by category and priority.

Quick Start

  1. Review AGENTS.md for a complete compilation of all rules with examples
  2. Reference specific rules from rules/ directory for deep dives
  3. Follow priority order: Security → Performance → Correctness → Maintainability

Available Rules

Security (CRITICAL)

Performance (HIGH)

Correctness (HIGH)

Maintainability (MEDIUM)

Review Process

1. Security First (CRITICAL)

Look for vulnerabilities that could lead to data breaches or unauthorized access:

  • SQL injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • Authentication/authorization bypasses
  • Hardcoded secrets
  • Insecure dependencies

2. Performance (HIGH)

Identify code that will cause slow performance at scale:

  • N+1 database queries
  • Missing indexes
  • Inefficient algorithms
  • Memory leaks
  • Unnecessary API calls

3. Correctness (HIGH)

Find bugs and edge cases:

  • Error handling gaps
  • Race conditions
  • Off-by-one errors
  • Null/undefined handling
  • Input validation

4. Maintainability (MEDIUM)

Improve code quality for long-term health:

  • Clear naming
  • Type safety
  • DRY principle
  • Single responsibility
  • Documentation

5. Testing

Verify adequate coverage:

  • Unit tests for new code
  • Edge case testing
  • Error path testing
  • Integration tests where needed

Review Output Format

Structure your reviews as:

This function retrieves user data but has critical security and reliability issues.

## Critical Issues 🔴

1. **SQL Injection Vulnerability** (Line 2)
   - **Problem:** User input directly interpolated into SQL query
   - **Impact:** Attackers can execute arbitrary SQL commands
   - **Fix:** Use parameterized queries
   ```python
   query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?"
   result = db.execute(query, (user_id,))

High Priority 🟠

  1. No Error Handling (Line 3-4)

    • Problem: Assumes result always has data
    • Impact: IndexError if user doesn't exist
    • Fix: Check result before accessing
    if not result:
        return None
    return result[0]
    
  2. Missing Type Hints (Line 1)

    • Problem: No type annotations
    • Impact: Reduces code clarity and IDE support
    • Fix: Add type hints
    def get_user(user_id: int) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
    

Recommendations

  • Add logging for debugging
  • Consider using an ORM to prevent SQL injection
  • Add input validation for user_id
how to use code-reviewer

How to use code-reviewer on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add code-reviewer
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill code-reviewer

The skills CLI fetches code-reviewer from GitHub repository shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/code-reviewer

Reload or restart Cursor to activate code-reviewer. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /code-reviewer) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.666 reviews
  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 28, 2024

    Registry listing for code-reviewer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Harper Shah· Dec 28, 2024

    code-reviewer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Daniel Rahman· Dec 24, 2024

    I recommend code-reviewer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Sofia Sethi· Dec 24, 2024

    Keeps context tight: code-reviewer is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Kwame Sethi· Dec 20, 2024

    code-reviewer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Noor Smith· Dec 16, 2024

    code-reviewer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Camila Desai· Dec 12, 2024

    code-reviewer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 19, 2024

    Keeps context tight: code-reviewer is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Camila Dixit· Nov 15, 2024

    Useful defaults in code-reviewer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Daniel Nasser· Nov 15, 2024

    Registry listing for code-reviewer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 66

1 / 7