clean-code-principles▌
asyrafhussin/agent-skills · updated Jun 3, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Language-agnostic reference for SOLID principles, design patterns, DRY, KISS, and clean code fundamentals.
- ›Covers seven rule categories prioritized by impact: SOLID principles, core principles (DRY, KISS, YAGNI), design patterns, code organization, naming, functions, and documentation
- ›Includes 23 rules across SOLID (5), core principles (8), and design patterns (8), with 4 additional categories planned
- ›Provides quick reference tables, TypeScript code examples, and an audit output form
Clean Code Principles
Fundamental software design principles, SOLID, design patterns, and clean code practices. Language-agnostic guidelines for writing maintainable, scalable software.
When to Apply
Reference these guidelines when:
- Designing new features or systems
- Reviewing code architecture
- Refactoring existing code
- Discussing design decisions
- Improving code quality
Rule Categories by Priority
| Priority | Category | Impact | Prefix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SOLID Principles | CRITICAL | solid- |
| 2 | Core Principles | CRITICAL | core- |
| 3 | Design Patterns | HIGH | pattern- |
| 4 | Code Organization | HIGH | org- |
| 5 | Naming & Readability | MEDIUM | name- |
| 6 | Functions & Methods | MEDIUM | func- |
| 7 | Comments & Documentation | LOW | doc- |
Quick Reference
1. SOLID Principles (CRITICAL)
solid-srp- Single Responsibility Principlesolid-ocp- Open/Closed Principlesolid-lsp- Liskov Substitution Principlesolid-isp- Interface Segregation Principlesolid-dip- Dependency Inversion Principle
2. Core Principles (CRITICAL)
core-dry- Don't Repeat Yourselfcore-kiss- Keep It Simple, Stupidcore-yagni- You Aren't Gonna Need Itcore-separation-of-concerns- Separate different responsibilitiescore-composition-over-inheritance- Favor compositioncore-law-of-demeter- Principle of least knowledgecore-fail-fast- Detect and report errors earlycore-encapsulation- Hide implementation details
3. Design Patterns (HIGH)
pattern-factory- Factory pattern for object creationpattern-strategy- Strategy pattern for algorithmspattern-repository- Repository pattern for data accesspattern-decorator- Decorator pattern for behavior extensionpattern-observer- Observer pattern for event handlingpattern-adapter- Adapter pattern for interface conversionpattern-facade- Facade pattern for simplified interfacespattern-dependency-injection- DI for loose coupling
4. Code Organization (HIGH) — planned
org-feature-folders- Organize by feature, not layerorg-module-boundaries- Clear module boundariesorg-layered-architecture- Proper layer separationorg-package-cohesion- Related code togetherorg-circular-dependencies- Avoid circular imports
5. Naming & Readability (MEDIUM) — planned
name-meaningful- Use intention-revealing namesname-consistent- Consistent naming conventionsname-searchable- Avoid magic numbers/stringsname-avoid-encodings- No Hungarian notationname-domain-language- Use domain terminology
6. Functions & Methods (MEDIUM) — planned
func-small- Keep functions smallfunc-single-purpose- Do one thingfunc-few-arguments- Limit parametersfunc-no-side-effects- Minimize side effectsfunc-command-query- Separate commands and queries
7. Comments & Documentation (LOW) — planned
doc-self-documenting- Code should explain itselfdoc-why-not-what- Explain why, not whatdoc-avoid-noise- No redundant commentsdoc-api-docs- Document public APIs
Essential Guidelines
For detailed examples and explanations, see the rule files:
- core-dry.md - Don't Repeat Yourself principle
- pattern-repository.md - Repository pattern for data access
SOLID Principles (Summary)
| Principle | Definition |
|---|---|
| Single Responsibility | A class should have only one reason to change |
| Open/Closed | Open for extension, closed for modification |
| Liskov Substitution | Subtypes must be substitutable for base types |
| Interface Segregation | Don't force clients to depend on unused interfaces |
| Dependency Inversion | Depend on abstractions, not concretions |
Core Principles (Summary)
| Principle | Definition |
|---|---|
| DRY | Don't Repeat Yourself - single source of truth |
| KISS | Keep It Simple - avoid over-engineering |
| YAGNI | You Aren't Gonna Need It - build only what's needed |
Quick Examples
// Single Responsibility - one class, one job
class UserService {
constructor(
private validator: UserValidator,
private repository: UserRepository,
) {}
createUser(data) {
this.validator.validate(data);
return this.repository.create(data);
}
}
// Dependency Inversion - depend on abstractions
interface Repository<T> {
find(id: string): Promise<T | null>;
save(entity: T): Promise<T>;
}
class OrderService {
constructor(private repository: Repository<Order>) {}
}
// DRY - single source of truth
const EMAIL_REGEX = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/;
const isValidEmail = (email: string) => EMAIL_REGEX.test(email);
// Meaningful names over magic numbers
const MINIMUM_AGE = 18;
if (user.age >= MINIMUM_AGE) { }
Output Format
When auditing code, output findings in this format:
file:line - [principle] Description of issue
Example:
src/services/UserService.ts:15 - [solid-srp] Class handles validation, persistence, and notifications
src/utils/helpers.ts:42 - [core-dry] Email validation duplicated from validators/email.ts
src/models/Order.ts:28 - [name-meaningful] Variable 'x' should describe its purpose
How to Use
Read individual rule files for detailed explanations:
rules/solid-srp-class.md
rules/core-dry.md
rules/pattern-repository.md
References
This skill is built on established software engineering principles:
Core Books
- Clean Code by Robert C. Martin - Foundation for clean code practices
- Design Patterns by Gang of Four - Classic design pattern catalog
- Refactoring by Martin Fowler - Improving code structure
- The Pragmatic Programmer by Hunt & Thomas - Practical wisdom
Online Resources
- Refactoring Guru - Design patterns and code smells
- Martin Fowler's Refactoring Catalog - Comprehensive refactoring techniques
- Uncle Bob's Clean Coder Blog - Software craftsmanship articles
Pattern Catalogs
Metadata
Version: 1.0.2 Status: Active Coverage: 23 rules across 3 implemented categories (SOLID, Core Principles, Design Patterns); 4 planned Last Updated: 2026-03-07
Rule Statistics
- SOLID Principles: 10 rules
- Core Principles: 12 rules
- Design Patterns: 1 rule
How to use clean-code-principles on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add clean-code-principles
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches clean-code-principles from GitHub repository asyrafhussin/agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate clean-code-principles. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /clean-code-principles) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★50 reviews- ★★★★★Kofi Johnson· Dec 28, 2024
clean-code-principles reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Soo Ramirez· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for clean-code-principles matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Soo Gonzalez· Dec 12, 2024
We added clean-code-principles from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Choi· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: clean-code-principles is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Ira Kapoor· Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for clean-code-principles matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Noah Perez· Nov 19, 2024
Keeps context tight: clean-code-principles is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Kofi Shah· Nov 15, 2024
We added clean-code-principles from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Aarav Menon· Nov 11, 2024
clean-code-principles reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Min Patel· Oct 14, 2024
Useful defaults in clean-code-principles — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Noah Choi· Oct 10, 2024
I recommend clean-code-principles for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 50