clean-code-principles

asyrafhussin/agent-skills · updated Jun 3, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/asyrafhussin/agent-skills --skill clean-code-principles
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Language-agnostic reference for SOLID principles, design patterns, DRY, KISS, and clean code fundamentals.

  • Covers seven rule categories prioritized by impact: SOLID principles, core principles (DRY, KISS, YAGNI), design patterns, code organization, naming, functions, and documentation
  • Includes 23 rules across SOLID (5), core principles (8), and design patterns (8), with 4 additional categories planned
  • Provides quick reference tables, TypeScript code examples, and an audit output form
skill.md

Clean Code Principles

Fundamental software design principles, SOLID, design patterns, and clean code practices. Language-agnostic guidelines for writing maintainable, scalable software.

When to Apply

Reference these guidelines when:

  • Designing new features or systems
  • Reviewing code architecture
  • Refactoring existing code
  • Discussing design decisions
  • Improving code quality

Rule Categories by Priority

Priority Category Impact Prefix
1 SOLID Principles CRITICAL solid-
2 Core Principles CRITICAL core-
3 Design Patterns HIGH pattern-
4 Code Organization HIGH org-
5 Naming & Readability MEDIUM name-
6 Functions & Methods MEDIUM func-
7 Comments & Documentation LOW doc-

Quick Reference

1. SOLID Principles (CRITICAL)

  • solid-srp - Single Responsibility Principle
  • solid-ocp - Open/Closed Principle
  • solid-lsp - Liskov Substitution Principle
  • solid-isp - Interface Segregation Principle
  • solid-dip - Dependency Inversion Principle

2. Core Principles (CRITICAL)

  • core-dry - Don't Repeat Yourself
  • core-kiss - Keep It Simple, Stupid
  • core-yagni - You Aren't Gonna Need It
  • core-separation-of-concerns - Separate different responsibilities
  • core-composition-over-inheritance - Favor composition
  • core-law-of-demeter - Principle of least knowledge
  • core-fail-fast - Detect and report errors early
  • core-encapsulation - Hide implementation details

3. Design Patterns (HIGH)

  • pattern-factory - Factory pattern for object creation
  • pattern-strategy - Strategy pattern for algorithms
  • pattern-repository - Repository pattern for data access
  • pattern-decorator - Decorator pattern for behavior extension
  • pattern-observer - Observer pattern for event handling
  • pattern-adapter - Adapter pattern for interface conversion
  • pattern-facade - Facade pattern for simplified interfaces
  • pattern-dependency-injection - DI for loose coupling

4. Code Organization (HIGH) — planned

  • org-feature-folders - Organize by feature, not layer
  • org-module-boundaries - Clear module boundaries
  • org-layered-architecture - Proper layer separation
  • org-package-cohesion - Related code together
  • org-circular-dependencies - Avoid circular imports

5. Naming & Readability (MEDIUM) — planned

  • name-meaningful - Use intention-revealing names
  • name-consistent - Consistent naming conventions
  • name-searchable - Avoid magic numbers/strings
  • name-avoid-encodings - No Hungarian notation
  • name-domain-language - Use domain terminology

6. Functions & Methods (MEDIUM) — planned

  • func-small - Keep functions small
  • func-single-purpose - Do one thing
  • func-few-arguments - Limit parameters
  • func-no-side-effects - Minimize side effects
  • func-command-query - Separate commands and queries

7. Comments & Documentation (LOW) — planned

  • doc-self-documenting - Code should explain itself
  • doc-why-not-what - Explain why, not what
  • doc-avoid-noise - No redundant comments
  • doc-api-docs - Document public APIs

Essential Guidelines

For detailed examples and explanations, see the rule files:

SOLID Principles (Summary)

Principle Definition
Single Responsibility A class should have only one reason to change
Open/Closed Open for extension, closed for modification
Liskov Substitution Subtypes must be substitutable for base types
Interface Segregation Don't force clients to depend on unused interfaces
Dependency Inversion Depend on abstractions, not concretions

Core Principles (Summary)

Principle Definition
DRY Don't Repeat Yourself - single source of truth
KISS Keep It Simple - avoid over-engineering
YAGNI You Aren't Gonna Need It - build only what's needed

Quick Examples

// Single Responsibility - one class, one job
class UserService {
  constructor(
    private validator: UserValidator,
    private repository: UserRepository,
  ) {}

  createUser(data) {
    this.validator.validate(data);
    return this.repository.create(data);
  }
}

// Dependency Inversion - depend on abstractions
interface Repository<T> {
  find(id: string): Promise<T | null>;
  save(entity: T): Promise<T>;
}

class OrderService {
  constructor(private repository: Repository<Order>) {}
}

// DRY - single source of truth
const EMAIL_REGEX = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/;
const isValidEmail = (email: string) => EMAIL_REGEX.test(email);

// Meaningful names over magic numbers
const MINIMUM_AGE = 18;
if (user.age >= MINIMUM_AGE) { }

Output Format

When auditing code, output findings in this format:

file:line - [principle] Description of issue

Example:

src/services/UserService.ts:15 - [solid-srp] Class handles validation, persistence, and notifications
src/utils/helpers.ts:42 - [core-dry] Email validation duplicated from validators/email.ts
src/models/Order.ts:28 - [name-meaningful] Variable 'x' should describe its purpose

How to Use

Read individual rule files for detailed explanations:

rules/solid-srp-class.md
rules/core-dry.md
rules/pattern-repository.md

References

This skill is built on established software engineering principles:

Core Books

  • Clean Code by Robert C. Martin - Foundation for clean code practices
  • Design Patterns by Gang of Four - Classic design pattern catalog
  • Refactoring by Martin Fowler - Improving code structure
  • The Pragmatic Programmer by Hunt & Thomas - Practical wisdom

Online Resources

Pattern Catalogs

Metadata

Version: 1.0.2 Status: Active Coverage: 23 rules across 3 implemented categories (SOLID, Core Principles, Design Patterns); 4 planned Last Updated: 2026-03-07

Rule Statistics

  • SOLID Principles: 10 rules
  • Core Principles: 12 rules
  • Design Patterns: 1 rule
how to use clean-code-principles

How to use clean-code-principles on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add clean-code-principles
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/asyrafhussin/agent-skills --skill clean-code-principles

The skills CLI fetches clean-code-principles from GitHub repository asyrafhussin/agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/clean-code-principles

Reload or restart Cursor to activate clean-code-principles. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /clean-code-principles) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.650 reviews
  • Kofi Johnson· Dec 28, 2024

    clean-code-principles reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Soo Ramirez· Dec 28, 2024

    Registry listing for clean-code-principles matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Soo Gonzalez· Dec 12, 2024

    We added clean-code-principles from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Evelyn Choi· Dec 4, 2024

    Keeps context tight: clean-code-principles is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Ira Kapoor· Nov 23, 2024

    Registry listing for clean-code-principles matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Noah Perez· Nov 19, 2024

    Keeps context tight: clean-code-principles is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Kofi Shah· Nov 15, 2024

    We added clean-code-principles from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Aarav Menon· Nov 11, 2024

    clean-code-principles reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Min Patel· Oct 14, 2024

    Useful defaults in clean-code-principles — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Noah Choi· Oct 10, 2024

    I recommend clean-code-principles for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

showing 1-10 of 50

1 / 5