supabase-audit-rlsโ–Œ

yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills ยท updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-rls
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

๐Ÿ”ด CRITICAL: PROGRESSIVE FILE UPDATES REQUIRED

skill.md

RLS Policy Audit

๐Ÿ”ด CRITICAL: PROGRESSIVE FILE UPDATES REQUIRED

You MUST write to context files AS YOU GO, not just at the end.

  • Write to .sb-pentest-context.json IMMEDIATELY after each finding
  • Log to .sb-pentest-audit.log BEFORE and AFTER each test
  • DO NOT wait until the skill completes to update files
  • If the skill crashes or is interrupted, all prior findings must already be saved

This is not optional. Failure to write progressively is a critical error.

This skill tests Row Level Security (RLS) policies for common vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.

When to Use This Skill

  • After discovering data exposure in tables
  • To verify RLS policies are correctly implemented
  • To test for common RLS bypass techniques
  • As part of a comprehensive security audit

Prerequisites

  • Tables listed
  • Anon key available
  • Preferably also test with an authenticated user token

Understanding RLS

Row Level Security in Supabase/PostgreSQL:

-- Enable RLS on a table
ALTER TABLE posts ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;

-- Create a policy
CREATE POLICY "Users see own posts"
  ON posts FOR SELECT
  USING (auth.uid() = author_id);

If RLS is enabled but no policies exist, ALL access is blocked.

Common RLS Issues

Issue Description Severity
RLS Disabled Table has no RLS protection P0
Missing Policy RLS enabled but no SELECT policy Variable
Overly Permissive Policy allows too much access P0-P1
Missing Operation SELECT policy but no INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE P1
USING vs WITH CHECK Read allowed but write inconsistent P1

Test Vectors

The skill tests these common bypass scenarios:

1. Unauthenticated Access

GET /rest/v1/users?select=*
# No Authorization header or with anon key only

2. Cross-User Access

# As user A, try to access user B's data
GET /rest/v1/orders?user_id=eq.[user-b-id]
Authorization: Bearer [user-a-token]

3. Filter Bypass

# Try to bypass filters with OR conditions
GET /rest/v1/posts?or=(published.eq.true,published.eq.false)

4. Join Exploitation

# Try to access data through related tables
GET /rest/v1/comments?select=*,posts(*)

5. RPC Bypass

# Check if RPC functions bypass RLS
POST /rest/v1/rpc/get_all_users

Usage

Basic RLS Audit

Audit RLS policies on my Supabase project

Specific Table

Test RLS on the users table

With Authenticated User

Test RLS policies using this user token: eyJ...

Output Format

โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•
 RLS POLICY AUDIT
โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•

 Project: abc123def.supabase.co
 Tables Audited: 8

 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
 RLS Status by Table
 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€

 1. users
    RLS Enabled: โŒ NO
    Status: ๐Ÿ”ด P0 - NO RLS PROTECTION

    All operations allowed without restriction!
    Test Results:
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ Anon SELECT: โœ“ Returns all 1,247 rows
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ Anon INSERT: โœ“ Succeeds (tested with rollback)
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ Anon UPDATE: โœ“ Would succeed
    โ””โ”€โ”€ Anon DELETE: โœ“ Would succeed

    Immediate Fix:
    ```sql
    ALTER TABLE users ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;

    CREATE POLICY "Users see own data"
      ON users FOR ALL
      USING (auth.uid() = id);
    ```

 2. posts
    RLS Enabled: โœ… YES
    Policies Found: 2
    Status: โœ… PROPERLY CONFIGURED

    Policies:
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ "Public sees published" (SELECT)
    โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ USING: (published = true)
    โ””โ”€โ”€ "Authors manage own" (ALL)
        โ””โ”€โ”€ USING: (auth.uid() = author_id)

    Test Results:
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ Anon SELECT: Only published posts (correct)
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ Anon INSERT: โŒ Blocked (correct)
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ Cross-user access: โŒ Blocked (correct)
    โ””โ”€โ”€ Filter bypass: โŒ Blocked (correct)

 3. orders
    RLS Enabled: โœ… YES
    Policies Found: 1
    Status: ๐ŸŸ  P1 - PARTIAL ISSUE

    Policies:
    โ””โ”€โ”€ "Users see own orders" (SELECT)
        โ””โ”€โ”€ USING: (auth.uid() = user_id)

    Issue Found:
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ No INSERT policy - users can't create orders via API
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ No UPDATE policy - users can't modify their orders
    โ””โ”€โ”€ This may be intentional (orders via Edge Functions)

    Recommendation: Document if intentional, or add policies:
    ```sql
    CREATE POLICY "Users insert own orders"
      ON orders FOR INSERT
      WITH CHECK (auth.uid() = user_id);
    ```

 4. comments
    RLS Enabled: โœ… YES
    Policies Found: 2
    Status: ๐ŸŸ  P1 - BYPASS POSSIBLE

    Policies:
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ "Anyone can read" (SELECT)
    โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ USING: (true)  โ† Too permissive
    โ””โ”€โ”€ "Users comment on posts" (INSERT)
        โ””โ”€โ”€ WITH CHECK: (auth.uid() = user_id)

    Issue Found:
    โ””โ”€โ”€ SELECT policy allows reading all comments
        including user_id, enabling user correlation

    Recommendation:
    ```sql
    -- Use a view to hide user_id
    CREATE VIEW public.comments_public AS
      SELECT id, post_id, content, created_at FROM comments;
    ```

 5. settings
    RLS Enabled: โŒ NO
    Status: ๐Ÿ”ด P0 - NO RLS PROTECTION

    Contains sensitive configuration!
    Immediate action required.

 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
 Summary
 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€

 RLS Disabled: 2 tables (users, settings) โ† CRITICAL
 RLS Enabled: 6 tables
   โ”œโ”€โ”€ Properly Configured: 3
   โ”œโ”€โ”€ Partial Issues: 2
   โ””โ”€โ”€ Major Issues: 1

 Bypass Tests:
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Unauthenticated access: 2 tables vulnerable
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Cross-user access: 0 tables vulnerable
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Filter bypass: 0 tables vulnerable
 โ””โ”€โ”€ Join exploitation: 1 table allows data leakage

โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•

Context Output

{
  "rls_audit": {
    "timestamp": "2025-01-31T10:45:00Z",
    "tables_audited": 8,
    "summary": {
      "rls_disabled": 2,
      "rls_enabled": 6,
      "properly_configured": 3,
      "partial_issues": 2,
      "major_issues": 1
    },
    "findings": [
      {
        "table": "users",
        "rls_enabled": false,
        "severity": "P0",
        "issue": "No RLS protection",
        "operations_exposed": ["SELECT", "INSERT", "UPDATE", "DELETE"]
      },
      {
        "table": "comments",
        "rls_enabled": true,
        "severity": "P1",
        "issue": "Overly permissive SELECT policy",
        "detail": "user_id exposed enabling correlation"
      }
    ]
  }
}

Common RLS Patterns

Good: User owns their data

CREATE POLICY "Users own their data"
  ON user_data FOR ALL
  USING (auth.uid() = user_id)
  WITH CHECK (auth.uid() = user_id);

Good: Public read, authenticated write

-- Anyone can read
CREATE POLICY "Public read" ON posts
  FOR SELECT USING (published = true);

-- Only authors can write
CREATE POLICY "Author write" ON posts
  FOR INSERT WITH CHECK (auth.uid() = author_id);

CREATE POLICY "Author update" ON posts
  FOR UPDATE USING (auth.uid() = author_id);

Bad: Using (true)

-- โŒ Too permissive
CREATE POLICY "Anyone" ON secrets
  FOR SELECT USING (true);

Bad: Forgetting WITH CHECK

-- โŒ Users can INSERT any user_id
CREATE POLICY "Insert" ON posts
  FOR INSERT WITH CHECK (true);  -- Should check user_id!

RLS Bypass Documentation

For each bypass found, the skill provides:

  1. Description of the vulnerability
  2. Proof of concept query
  3. Impact assessment
  4. Fix with SQL code
  5. Documentation link

MANDATORY: Progressive Context File Updates

โš ๏ธ This skill MUST update tracking files PROGRESSIVELY during execution, NOT just at the end.

Critical Rule: Write As You Go

DO NOT batch all writes at the end. Instead:

  1. Before testing each table โ†’ Log the action to .sb-pentest-audit.log
  2. After each RLS finding โ†’ Immediately update .sb-pentest-context.json
  3. After each test completes โ†’ Log the result to .sb-pentest-audit.log

This ensures that if the skill is interrupted, crashes, or times out, all findings up to that point are preserved.

Required Actions (Progressive)

  1. Update .sb-pentest-context.json with results:

    {
      "rls_audit": {
        "timestamp": "...",
        "tables_audited": 8,
        "summary": 
how to use supabase-audit-rls

How to use supabase-audit-rls on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • โ€บCursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • โ€บNode.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • โ€บActive project directory or workspace where you want to add supabase-audit-rls
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-rls

The skills CLI fetches supabase-audit-rls from GitHub repository yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

โ—† Which agents do you want to install to?
โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”€โ”€ Universal (.agents/skills) โ”€โ”€ always included โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
โ”‚ โ€ข Amp
โ”‚ โ€ข Antigravity
โ”‚ โ€ข Cline
โ”‚ โ€ข Codex
โ”‚ โ—Cursor(selected)
โ”‚ โ€ข Cursor
โ”‚ โ€ข Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/supabase-audit-rls

Reload or restart Cursor to activate supabase-audit-rls. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /supabase-audit-rls) or your agent's skill management interface.

โš 

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED โ†’

Use Casesโ–Œ

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

โœ“

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

โœ“

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

โœ“

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

โœ“

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guideโ–Œ

Prerequisites

  • โ€บClaude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • โ€บAccess to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • โ€บUnderstanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • โ€บStakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • โš Not validating competitive researchโ€”verify facts before sharing
  • โš Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • โš Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • โš Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • โš Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practicesโ–Œ

โœ“ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

โœ— Don't

  • โˆ’Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • โˆ’Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • โˆ’Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • โˆ’Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • โˆ’Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

๐Ÿ’ก Pro Tips

  • โ˜…Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • โ˜…Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • โ˜…Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • โ˜…Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use Thisโ–Œ

โœ“ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

โœ— Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Pathโ–Œ

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Huntโ€“style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet โ€” start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.8โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…47 reviews
  • โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…Kaira Dialloยท Dec 28, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: supabase-audit-rls is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…Pratham Wareยท Dec 24, 2024

    Registry listing for supabase-audit-rls matched our evaluation โ€” installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…Amelia Guptaยท Dec 24, 2024

    I recommend supabase-audit-rls for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…Kaira Mensahยท Dec 16, 2024

    supabase-audit-rls fits our agent workflows well โ€” practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…Aditi Chenยท Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in supabase-audit-rls โ€” fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…Sofia Sethiยท Dec 8, 2024

    supabase-audit-rls has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…Kiara Chawlaยท Nov 27, 2024

    We added supabase-audit-rls from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…Meera Dixitยท Nov 27, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: supabase-audit-rls is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…Kiara Bhatiaยท Nov 19, 2024

    supabase-audit-rls has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…Sakshi Patilยท Nov 15, 2024

    supabase-audit-rls reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 47

1 / 5