accessibility-audit▌
webflow/webflow-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Comprehensive WCAG 2.1 accessibility audit for Webflow pages with detailed issue detection and actionable fixes.
Accessibility Audit
Comprehensive WCAG 2.1 accessibility audit for Webflow pages with detailed issue detection and actionable fixes.
Important Note
ALWAYS use Webflow MCP tools for all operations:
- Use Webflow MCP's
webflow_guide_toolto get best practices before starting - Use Webflow MCP's
data_sites_toolwith actionlist_sitesto identify available sites - Use Webflow MCP's
data_sites_toolwith actionget_siteto retrieve site details - Use Webflow MCP's
data_pages_toolwith actionlist_pagesto get all pages - Use Webflow MCP's
element_toolwith actionget_all_elementsto get detailed element information (requires Designer) - Use Webflow MCP's
element_toolwith actionadd_or_update_attributeto fix accessibility issues (requires Designer) - Use Webflow MCP's
element_snapshot_toolto get visual previews of elements - DO NOT use any other tools or methods for Webflow operations
- All tool calls must include the required
contextparameter (15-25 words, third-person perspective) - Designer connection required - This skill needs Designer to access element attributes and styles
Instructions
Phase 1: Site & Page Selection
- Get site information: Use Webflow MCP's
data_sites_toolwith actionlist_sitesto identify target site - Ask for page selection:
- If user provides page ID, use it directly
- Otherwise, use
data_pages_toolwith actionlist_pagesto show available pages - Let user select which page(s) to audit
- Confirm audit scope: Ask user what to check:
- Full audit (all accessibility checks)
- Critical issues only (WCAG Level A)
- Specific categories (forms, buttons, navigation, etc.)
Phase 2: Element Extraction & Analysis
- Ensure Designer is connected: Before proceeding, verify Webflow Designer is open and connected
- If not connected, instruct user to open Designer and connect
- This is required to access element attributes and styles
- Switch to target page: Use
de_page_toolwith actionswitch_pageto navigate to the page being audited - Extract all elements: Use
element_toolwith actionget_all_elementsfor detailed analysis- Set
include_style_properties: trueto check focus styles - Set
include_all_breakpoint_styles: falseto minimize data
- Set
- Parse element data: Identify interactive and content elements:
- Buttons (Button, LinkBlock with button role)
- Links (TextLink, Link, LinkBlock)
- Form inputs (Input, Select, Textarea)
- Headings (Heading elements with levels)
- Interactive divs/spans (check for onClick or interactive roles)
- Images (Image elements) - SKIP for this audit
- Extract attributes for each element:
- ARIA attributes (aria-label, aria-describedby, role, tabIndex)
- DOM attributes (id, domId, href, type, placeholder)
- Text content
- Style properties (outline, border for focus states)
- Element metadata (canHaveAttributes, tag name)
Phase 3: Accessibility Checks
Critical Issues (Must Fix - WCAG Level A)
-
Icon-only buttons without labels (WCAG 4.1.2)
- Find: Button elements with no text content
- Check: Missing
aria-labeloraria-labelledby - Impact: Screen readers cannot identify button purpose
- Fix: Add
aria-labelattribute with descriptive text
-
Form inputs without labels (WCAG 1.3.1)
- Find: Input, Select, Textarea elements
- Check: Missing associated label or
aria-label - Impact: Users don't know what input is for
- Fix: Add
aria-labelor associate with<label>usingid
-
Non-semantic click handlers (WCAG 2.1.1)
- Find: Div or Span elements (identified by element type)
- Check: Interactive behavior without proper role/keyboard support
- Impact: Not keyboard accessible, screen readers miss interactivity
- Fix: Add
role="button",tabIndex="0", suggest using real<button>
-
Links without destination (WCAG 2.1.1)
- Find: Link elements with no
hrefattribute - Check: Links that only use onClick without href
- Impact: Not keyboard accessible, breaks browser features
- Fix: Add proper
hrefor convert to button
- Find: Link elements with no
Serious Issues (Should Fix - WCAG Level AA)
-
Focus outline removed without replacement (WCAG 2.4.7)
- Find: Elements with
outline: nonestyle - Check: No visible alternative focus indicator
- Impact: Keyboard users can't see focus
- Fix: Add visible focus style (border, box-shadow, background change)
- Find: Elements with
-
Missing keyboard handlers (WCAG 2.1.1)
- Find: Elements with onClick handlers
- Check: Missing onKeyDown for Enter/Space keys
- Impact: Not usable with keyboard alone
- Fix: Add keyboard event handlers
-
Touch target too small (WCAG 2.5.5)
- Find: Clickable elements (buttons, links)
- Check: Width or height < 44px
- Impact: Hard to tap on mobile devices
- Fix: Increase padding or min-width/min-height to 44px
Moderate Issues (Consider Fixing)
-
Heading hierarchy problems (WCAG 1.3.1)
- Find: Heading elements (h1-h6)
- Check: Skipped levels (h1 → h3, skipping h2)
- Impact: Confusing document structure
- Fix: Use proper sequential heading levels
-
Positive tabIndex (WCAG 2.4.3)
- Find: Elements with tabIndex > 0
- Check: Disrupts natural tab order
- Impact: Confusing keyboard navigation
- Fix: Use tabIndex="0" or "-1" only, let natural DOM order work
-
Role without required attributes (WCAG 4.1.2)
- Find: Elements with ARIA roles
- Check: Missing required ARIA attributes (e.g., role="button" without tabIndex)
- Impact: Incomplete accessibility semantics
- Fix: Add required attributes for role
Phase 4: Issue Categorization & Scoring
-
Categorize all findings:
- Critical: Must fix (blocks access)
- Serious: Should fix (significantly impacts usability)
- Moderate: Consider fixing (improves experience)
-
Calculate accessibility score (0-100):
- Start at 100
- Critical issue: -10 points each
- Serious issue: -5 points each
- Moderate issue: -2 points each
- Minimum score: 0
-
Generate severity summary:
- Total issues found
- Breakdown by severity
- Most common issue types
- Pages/sections most affected
Phase 5: Report Generation
-
Create detailed report with specific format:
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════ ACCESSIBILITY AUDIT: [Page Name] ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════ CRITICAL (X issues) ─────────────────── [A11Y] Element: Button "Submit" Issue: Button missing accessible name Location: Form section, element ID: {component: "abc", element: "xyz"} Current: <button><CloseIcon /></button> Fix: Add aria-label="Close" WCAG: 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value [A11Y] Element: Input field Issue: Form input without label Location: Contact form, element ID: {component: "def", element: "uvw"} Current: <input type="email" /> Fix: Add aria-label="Email address" or associate with <label> WCAG: 1.3.1 Info and Relationships SERIOUS (X issues) ────────────────── [A11Y] Element: Link "Read more" Issue: Focus outline removed without visible alternative Location: Blog section Current: outline: none Fix: Add visible focus style (e.g., border: 2px solid blue) WCAG: 2.4.7 Focus Visible MODERATE (X issues) ─────────────────── [A11Y] Element: Heading Issue: Heading hierarchy skipped (h1 → h3) Location: Article section Current: <h3>Subsection</h3> after <h1>Title</h1> Fix: Change to <h2> or add intermediate h2 WCAG: 1.3.1 Info and Relationships ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════ SUMMARY ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── Total Issues: X - Critical: X issues - Serious: X issues - Moderate: X issues Accessibility Score: XX/100 Most Common Issues: 1. [Issue type] - X occurrences 2. [Issue type] - X occurrences 3. [Issue type] - X occurrences ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════ -
Provide actionable insights:
- Prioritized fix list (critical first)
- Quick wins (easy fixes with big impact)
- Design pattern recommendations
- Resources for learning more
Phase 6: Fix Suggestions & Approval (Optional)
-
Offer to fix issues automatically: Designer is already connected, so offer auto-fixes
-
Show preview of fixes:
Which issues would you like to fix? [1] ✓ Add aria-label to Submit button Element: Button in contact form Fix: Add aria-label="Submit contact form" Safe: Yes (adding attribute only) [2] ✓ Add aria-label to email input Element: Input in contact form Fix: Add aria-label="Email address" Safe: Yes [3] ⚠️ Fix heading hierarchy Element: h3 in article section Fix: Change heading level from h3 to h2 Safe: May affect visual styling Type numbers to skip (e.g., "3"), "all" for all, "none" to cancel -
Apply approved fixes: Use
element_toolwith actionadd_or_update_attribute- Process in batches
- Show progress for large fix sets
- Report success/failure for each
-
Generate post-fix report:
- Issues fixed: X
- Issues remaining: Y
- New accessibility score: XX/100 (improved from YY/100)
Phase 7: Export & Resources (Optional)
-
Offer export formats:
- Markdown (readable documentation)
- JSON (machine-readable for tracking)
- CSV (spreadsheet for team review)
-
Provide resources:
- WCAG 2.1 quick reference links
- Webflow accessibility best practices
- Recommended testing tools (browser extensions, screen readers)
Important Considerations
What This Skill Checks
✅ Button accessibility (labels, roles) ✅ Form input labels and associations ✅ Link semantics and keyboard access ✅ Focus visibility and keyboard navigation ✅ Heading hierarchy and structure ✅ ARIA roles and attributes ✅ Touch target sizes ✅ Interactive element semantics
What This Skill Does NOT Check
❌ Image alt text (use asset-audit skill instead) ❌ Color contrast ratios (requires visual analysis) ❌ Animation/motion preferences ❌ Screen reader testing (needs manual verification) ❌ Content readability (language level, clarity)
Limitations
- Cannot detect visual-only issues (color contrast, small text)
- Cannot test actual screen reader behavior
- Cannot validate content quality or clarity
- Relies on element attributes and structure only
Examples
Example 1: Full Page Audit
User prompt:
Run an accessibility audit on my homepage
Step 1: Site & Page Selection
🔍 Accessibility Audit: Page Selection
I'll help you audit your homepage for accessibility issues.
First, let me get your site information...
Available sites:
1. Company Website
2. Portfolio Site
Which site? (1/2)
User response: 1
Step 2: Page Selection
Available pages in Company Website:
1. Home (/)
2. About (/about)
3. Contact (/contact)
4. Blog (/blog)
Which page would you like to audit? (1 for Home)
User response: 1
Step 3: Audit Scope
What level of audit would you like?
1. Full audit (all WCAG checks) - Recommended
2. Critical issues only (Level A compliance)
3. Specific categories (buttons, forms, navigation)
Your choice: (1/2/3)
User response: 1
Step 4: Audit Progress
🔄 Running Accessibility Audit...
Progress:
✅ Extracted page content (45 elements)
✅ Analyzing buttons and interactive elements
✅ Checking form inputs and labels
✅ Validating heading hierarchy
✅ Checking keyboard navigation
🔄 Analyzing focus states...
Analysis complete!
Step 5: Report
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
ACCESSIBILITY AUDIT: Home
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
CRITICAL (3 issues)
───────────────────
[A11Y] Element: Button (navigation toggle)
Issue: Icon-only button missing accessible name
Location: Header navigation
Element ID: {component: "nav-01", element: "btn-menu"}
Current: <button><MenuIcon /></button>
Fix: Add aria-label="Open navigation menu"
WCAG: 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value
[A11Y] Element: Input (email subscription)
Issue: Form input without label
Location: Footer, newsletter signup
Element ID: {component: "footer-01", element: "email-input"}
Current: <input type="email" placeholder="Enter email" />
Fix: Add aria-label="Email address for newsletter"
WCAG: 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
[A11Y] Element: Div (clickable card)
Issue: Non-semantic interactive element
Location: Services section, card 2
Element ID: {component: "services-01", element: "card-02"}
Current: <div onClick={...}>Service card</div>
Fix: Convert to <button> or add role="button" + tabIndex="0"
WCAG: 2.1.1 Keyboard
SERIOUS (5 issues)
──────────────────
[A11Y] Element: Link "Learn more"
Issue: Focus outline removed without visible alternative
Location: Hero section
Element ID: {component: "hero-01", element: "cta-link"}
Current: outline: none
Fix: Add focus style - border: 2px solid #0066cc or box-shadow
WCAG: 2.4.7 Focus Visible
[A11Y] Element: Button "Subscribe"
Issue: Touch target too small (30px × 36px)
Location: Footer newsletter form
Element ID: {component: "footer-01", element: "submit-btn"}
Current: Small button
Fix: Increase padding or set min-height: 44px
WCAG: 2.5.5 Target Size
[continues with 3 more serious issues...]
MODERATE (4 issues)
───────────────────
[A11Y] Element: Heading "Our Services"
Issue: Heading hierarchy skipped (h1 → h3)
Location: Services section
Element ID: {component: "services-01", element: "heading"}
Current: <h3>Our Services</h3> follows <h1>Welcome</h1>
Fix: Change to <h2> to maintain proper hierarchy
WCAG: 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
[continues with 3 more moderate issues...]
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
SUMMARY
───────────────────────────────────────────────────
Total Issues: 12
- Critical: 3 issues (must fix)
- Serious: 5 issues (should fix)
- Moderate: 4 issues (consider fixing)
Accessibility Score: 64/100
Most Common Issues:
1. Missing button labels - 2 occurrences
2. Focus styles removed - 3 occurrences
3. Heading hierarchy problems - 2 occurrences
Quick Wins (Easy + High Impact):
✨ Add aria-label to icon buttons (2 min, +20 score points)
✨ Add input labels (5 min, +10 score points)
✨ Add focus styles (10 min, +15 score points)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
💡 Next Steps:
1. Fix critical issues first (blocks access for some users)
2. Add visible focus styles for keyboard users
3. Test with keyboard navigation (Tab, Enter, Space keys)
4. Consider testing with screen reader (NVDA/JAWS/VoiceOver)
How to use accessibility-audit on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add accessibility-audit
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches accessibility-audit from GitHub repository webflow/webflow-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate accessibility-audit. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /accessibility-audit) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★38 reviews- ★★★★★Nikhil Chen· Dec 20, 2024
Registry listing for accessibility-audit matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Isabella Rao· Nov 27, 2024
accessibility-audit is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Anaya Shah· Nov 11, 2024
Useful defaults in accessibility-audit — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Isabella Srinivasan· Oct 18, 2024
Keeps context tight: accessibility-audit is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Tandon· Oct 2, 2024
I recommend accessibility-audit for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Sep 25, 2024
Registry listing for accessibility-audit matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Dev Rahman· Sep 17, 2024
Registry listing for accessibility-audit matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Xiao Dixit· Sep 5, 2024
Useful defaults in accessibility-audit — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Isabella Torres· Aug 24, 2024
I recommend accessibility-audit for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Aug 16, 2024
accessibility-audit reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 38