Use this skill for system-level design decisions rather than implementation details within a single service or component.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionsoftware-architecture-designExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches software-architecture-design from vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate software-architecture-design. Access via /software-architecture-design in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
2
total installs
2
this week
53
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
2
installs
2
this week
53
stars
Use this skill for system-level design decisions rather than implementation details within a single service or component.
| Task | Pattern/Tool | Key Resources | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Choose architecture style | Layered, Microservices, Event-driven, Serverless | modern-patterns.md | Greenfield projects, major refactors |
| Design for scale | Load balancing, Caching, Sharding, Read replicas | scalability-reliability-guide.md | High-traffic systems, performance goals |
| Ensure resilience | Circuit breakers, Retries, Bulkheads, Graceful degradation | scalability-reliability-guide.md | Distributed systems, external dependencies |
| Document decisions | Architecture Decision Record (ADR) | adr-template.md | Major technical decisions, tradeoff analysis |
| Define service boundaries | Domain-Driven Design (DDD), Bounded contexts | microservices-template.md | Microservices decomposition |
| Model data consistency | ACID vs BASE, Event sourcing, CQRS, Saga patterns | data-architecture-patterns.md | Multi-service transactions |
| Plan observability | SLIs/SLOs/SLAs, Distributed tracing, Metrics, Logs | architecture-blueprint.md | Production readiness |
| Migrate from monolith | Strangler fig, Database decomposition, Shadow traffic | migration-modernization-guide.md | Legacy modernization |
| Design inter-service comms | API Gateway, Service mesh, BFF pattern | api-gateway-service-mesh.md | Microservices networking |
Invoke when working on:
Use other skills instead for:
Project needs: [New System or Major Refactor]
├─ Single team, evolving domain?
│ ├─ Start simple → Modular Monolith (clear module boundaries)
│ └─ Need rapid iteration → Layered Architecture
│
├─ Multiple teams, clear bounded contexts?
│ ├─ Independent deployment critical → Microservices
│ └─ Shared data model → Modular Monolith with service modules
│
├─ Event-driven workflows?
│ ├─ Asynchronous processing → Event-Driven Architecture (Kafka, queues)
│ └─ Complex state machines → Saga pattern + Event Sourcing
│
├─ Variable/unpredictable load?
│ ├─ Pay-per-use model → Serverless (AWS Lambda, Cloudflare Workers)
│ └─ Batch processing → Serverless + queues
│
└─ High consistency requirements?
├─ Strong ACID guarantees → Monolith or Modular Monolith
└─ Distributed data → CQRS + Event Sourcing
Decision Factors:
See references/modern-patterns.md for detailed pattern descriptions.
The references in this skill are background knowledge for you — absorb the patterns and present them as your own expertise. Do not cite internal reference file names (e.g., "from data-architecture-patterns.md") in user-facing output. Users don't know these files exist.
Every architecture recommendation should include:
Use this workflow when a user asks for architecture recommendations, decomposition, or major platform decisions.
Preferred deliverables (pick what fits the request):
assets/planning/architecture-blueprint.mdassets/planning/adr-template.mdreferences/modern-patterns.md, references/scalability-reliability-guide.mdLoad only when the question explicitly involves current trends, vendor-specific constraints, or "what's the latest thinking on X?"
platform_engineering_2026 — IDP trends, AI-platform convergence, Backstageoptional_ai_architecture — RAG patterns, multi-agent design, MCP/A2A protocolsmodern_architecture_2025 — Data mesh, composable architecture, continuous architectureIf live web access is available, consult 2–3 authoritative sources from data/sources.json and fold findings into the recommendation. If not, answer with durable patterns and explicitly state assumptions that could change (vendor limits, pricing, managed-service capabilities).
Read at most 2–3 references per question — pick the ones most relevant to the specific ask. Do not read all of them.
| Reference | Contents | When to Read |
|---|---|---|
| modern-patterns.md | 10 architecture patterns with decision trees | Choosing or comparing patterns |
| scalability-reliability-guide.md | CAP theorem, DB scaling, caching, circuit breakers, SRE | Scaling or reliability questions |
| data-architecture-patterns.md | CQRS variants, event sourcing, data mesh, sagas, consistency | Data flow across services |
| migration-modernization-guide.md | Strangler fig, DB decomposition, feature flags, risk assessment | Refactoring a monolith |
| api-gateway-service-mesh.md | Gateway patterns, service mesh, mTLS, observability | Inter-service communication |
| architecture-trends-2026.md | Platform engineering, data mesh, AI-native systems | Current trends only |
| operational-playbook.md | Architecture questions framework, decomposition heuristics | Design discussion framing |
Planning & Documentation (assets/planning/):
Architecture Patterns (assets/patterns/):
Operations (assets/operations/):
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
anthropics/claude-code
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
leonxlnx/taste-skill
erichowens/some_claude_skills
hyperb1iss/hyperskills
omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity
I recommend software-architecture-design for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: software-architecture-design is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
software-architecture-design reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend software-architecture-design for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Keeps context tight: software-architecture-design is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
software-architecture-design reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
We added software-architecture-design from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
software-architecture-design fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Useful defaults in software-architecture-design — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
software-architecture-design is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 70