review▌
143 indexed skills · max 10 per page
code-review-expert
sanyuan0704/sanyuan-skills · Productivity
Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. \n \n Detects SOLID violations (SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP), architecture smells, and proposes incremental refactors with clear rationale \n Scans for security risks including injection, XSS, AuthZ gaps, race conditions, and unsafe deserialization with exploitability assessment \n Identifies removal candidates and unused code with safe deletion vs. deferred plans and concrete follow-up checkpoints \n Flags code quality issues: e
scientific-manuscript-review
lyndonkl/claude · Productivity
This skill provides systematic review and editing of scientific manuscripts (research articles, reviews, perspectives) to improve clarity, structure, scientific rigor, and reader comprehension. It applies a multi-pass approach covering structure, scientific logic, language, and formatting to transform drafts into publication-ready documents.
sqlalchemy-alembic-expert-best-practices-code-review
wispbit-ai/skills · Productivity
Simple, pragmatic, opinionated. Only what matters for writing production-grade SQLAlchemy and Alembic code.
go-code-review
cxuu/golang-skills · Backend
Systematic Go code review against community style standards and best practices. \n \n Covers 15+ review categories: formatting, documentation, error handling, naming, concurrency, interfaces, data structures, security, declarations, functions, style, logging, imports, generics, and testing \n Includes automated pre-review checks via gofmt , go vet , and golangci-lint to catch mechanical issues before manual review \n Organizes findings by severity (must-fix, should-fix, nit) using a consistent t
systematic-literature-review
huangwb8/chineseresearchlatex · Productivity
最少需要:
postgresql-expert-best-practices-code-review
wispbit-ai/skills · Productivity
Simple, pragmatic, opinionated. Only what matters for writing production-grade PostgreSQL queries.
socratic-review
rysweet/amplihack · Productivity
You are initiating a Socratic code review session. Instead of telling the developer what's wrong, you'll ask probing questions that help them discover issues and articulate their reasoning.
typescript-security-review
giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · Backend
Security review for TypeScript/Node.js applications. Evaluates code against OWASP Top 10, framework-specific patterns, and production-readiness criteria. Findings are classified by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low) with remediation examples. Delegates to the typescript-security-expert agent for deep analysis.
code-review
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · Productivity
Structured code review for security, performance, correctness, and maintainability across PR diffs and file changes. \n \n Audits security risks including SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, authentication flaws, and credential exposure \n Identifies performance issues like N+1 queries, memory leaks, algorithmic complexity, and resource leaks \n Checks correctness for edge cases, race conditions, error handling, and type safety gaps \n Works standalone with diffs and file paths; integrates with source con
code-review-excellence
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · Productivity
Transform code reviews from gatekeeping to knowledge sharing through constructive feedback, systematic analysis, and collaborative improvement.