go-code-review▌
cxuu/golang-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Systematic Go code review against community style standards and best practices.
- ›Covers 15+ review categories: formatting, documentation, error handling, naming, concurrency, interfaces, data structures, security, declarations, functions, style, logging, imports, generics, and testing
- ›Includes automated pre-review checks via gofmt , go vet , and golangci-lint to catch mechanical issues before manual review
- ›Organizes findings by severity (must-fix, should-fix, nit) using a consistent t
Go Code Review Checklist
Review Procedure
Use
assets/review-template.mdwhen formatting the output of a code review to ensure consistent structure with Must Fix / Should Fix / Nits severity grouping.
- Run
gofmt -d .andgo vet ./...to catch mechanical issues first - Read the diff file-by-file; for each file, check the categories below in order
- Flag issues with specific line references and the rule name
- After reviewing all files, re-read flagged items to verify they're genuine issues
- Summarize findings grouped by severity (must-fix, should-fix, nit)
Validation: After completing the review, re-read the diff once more to verify every flagged issue is real. Remove any finding you cannot justify with a specific line reference.
Formatting
- gofmt: Code is formatted with
gofmtorgoimports→ go-linting
Documentation
- Comment sentences: Comments are full sentences starting with the name being described, ending with a period → go-documentation
- Doc comments: All exported names have doc comments; non-trivial unexported declarations too → go-documentation
- Package comments: Package comment appears adjacent to package clause with no blank line → go-documentation
- Named result parameters: Only used when they clarify meaning (e.g., multiple same-type returns), not just to enable naked returns → go-documentation
Error Handling
- Handle errors: No discarded errors with
_; handle, return, or (exceptionally) panic → go-error-handling - Error strings: Lowercase, no punctuation (unless starting with proper noun/acronym) → go-error-handling
- In-band errors: No magic values (-1, "", nil); use multiple returns with error or ok bool → go-error-handling
- Indent error flow: Handle errors first and return; keep normal path at minimal indentation → go-error-handling
Naming
- MixedCaps: Use
MixedCapsormixedCaps, never underscores; unexported ismaxLengthnotMAX_LENGTH→ go-naming - Initialisms: Keep consistent case:
URL/url,ID/id,HTTP/http(e.g.,ServeHTTP,xmlHTTPRequest) → go-naming - Variable names: Short names for limited scope (
i,r,c); longer names for wider scope → go-naming - Receiver names: One or two letter abbreviation of type (
cforClient); nothis,self,me; consistent across methods → go-naming - Package names: No stuttering (use
chubby.Filenotchubby.ChubbyFile); avoidutil,common,misc→ go-packages - Avoid built-in names: Don't shadow
error,string,len,cap,append,copy,new,make→ go-declarations
Concurrency
- Goroutine lifetimes: Clear when/whether goroutines exit; document if not obvious → go-concurrency
- Synchronous functions: Prefer sync over async; let callers add concurrency if needed → go-concurrency
- Contexts: First parameter; not in structs; no custom Context types; pass even if you think you don't need to → go-context
Interfaces
- Interface location: Define in consumer package, not implementor; return concrete types from producers → go-interfaces
- No premature interfaces: Don't define before used; don't define "for mocking" on implementor side → go-interfaces
- Receiver type: Use pointer if mutating, has sync fields, or is large; value for small immutable types; don't mix → go-interfaces
Data Structures
- Empty slices: Prefer
var t []string(nil) overt := []string{}(non-nil zero-length) → go-data-structures - Copying: Be careful copying structs with pointer/slice fields; don't copy
*Tmethods' receivers by value → go-data-structures
Security
- Crypto rand: Use
crypto/randfor keys, notmath/rand→ go-defensive - Don't panic: Use error returns for normal error handling; panic only for truly exceptional cases → go-defensive
Declarations and Initialization
- Group similar: Related
var/const/typein parenthesized blocks; separate unrelated → go-declarations - var vs :=: Use
varfor intentional zero values;:=for explicit assignments → go-declarations - Reduce scope: Move declarations close to usage; use if-init to limit variable scope → go-declarations
- Struct init: Always use field names; omit zero fields;
varfor zero structs → go-declarations - Use
any: Preferanyoverinterface{}in new code → go-declarations
Functions
- File ordering: Types → constructors → exported methods → unexported → utilities → go-functions
- Signature formatting: All args on own lines with trailing comma when wrapping → go-functions
- Naked parameters: Add
/* name */comments for ambiguous bool/int args, or use custom types → go-functions - Printf naming: Functions accepting format strings end in
fforgo vet→ go-functions
Style
- Line length: No rigid limit, but avoid uncomfortably long lines; break by semantics, not arbitrary length → go-style-core
- Naked returns: Only in short functions; explicit returns in medium/large functions → go-style-core
- Pass values: Don't use pointers just to save bytes; pass
stringnot*stringfor small fixed-size types → go-performance - String concatenation:
+for simple;fmt.Sprintffor formatting;strings.Builderfor loops → go-performance
Logging
- Use slog: New code uses
log/slog, notlogorfmt.Printlnfor operational logging → go-logging - Structured fields: Log messages use static strings with key-value attributes, not fmt.Sprintf → go-logging
- Appropriate levels: Debug for developer tracing, Info for notable events, Warn for recoverable issues, Error for failures → go-logging
- No secrets in logs: PII, credentials, and tokens are never logged → go-logging
Imports
- Import groups: Standard library first, then blank line, then external packages → go-packages
- Import renaming: Avoid unless collision; rename local/project-specific import on collision → go-packages
- Import blank:
import _ "pkg"only in main package or tests → go-packages - Import dot: Only for circular dependency workarounds in tests → go-packages
Generics
- When to use: Only when multiple types share identical logic and interfaces don't suffice → go-generics
- Type aliases: Use definitions for new types; aliases only for package migration → go-generics
Testing
- Examples: Include runnable
Examplefunctions or tests demonstrating usage → go-documentation - Useful test failures: Messages include what was wrong, inputs, got, and want; order is
got != want→ go-testing - TestMain: Use only when all tests need common setup with teardown; prefer scoped helpers first → go-testing
- Real transports: Prefer
httptest.NewServer+ real client over mocking HTTP → go-testing
Automated Checks
Run automated pre-review checks:
bash scripts/pre-review.sh ./... # text output
bash scripts/pre-review.sh --json ./... # structured JSON output
Or manually: gofmt -l <path> && go vet ./... && golangci-lint run ./...
Fix any issues before proceeding to the checklist above. For linter setup and configuration, see go-linting.
Integrative Example
Read references/WEB-SERVER.md when building a production HTTP server and want to verify your code applies concurrency, error handling, context, documentation, and naming conventions together.
Related Skills
- Style foundations: See go-style-core when resolving formatting debates or applying the clarity > simplicity > concision priority
- Linting setup: See go-linting when configuring golangci-lint or adding automated checks to CI
- Error strategy: See go-error-handling when reviewing error wrapping, sentinel errors, or the handle-once pattern
- Naming conventions: See go-naming when evaluating identifier names, receiver names, or package-symbol stuttering
- Testing patterns: See go-testing when reviewing test code for table-driven structure, failure messages, or helper usage
- Concurrency safety: See go-concurrency when reviewing goroutine lifetimes, channel usage, or mutex placement
- Logging practices: See go-logging when reviewing log usage, structured logging, or slog configuration
How to use go-code-review on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add go-code-review
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches go-code-review from GitHub repository cxuu/golang-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate go-code-review. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /go-code-review) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★58 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: go-code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Ishan Chen· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: go-code-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Ama Abebe· Dec 28, 2024
go-code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Arjun Martin· Dec 16, 2024
Useful defaults in go-code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Zara Khanna· Dec 8, 2024
We added go-code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Fatima Tandon· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend go-code-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Desai· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: go-code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 19, 2024
We added go-code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Jain· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for go-code-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Hassan Martin· Nov 19, 2024
go-code-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 58