Systematic Go code review against community style standards and best practices.
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example: Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example: Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example: Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Time estimate: 15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Prerequisites
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add cxuu/golang-skills --skill go-code-reviewCompatible with
Supported agents
Covers 15+ review categories: formatting, documentation, error handling, naming, concurrency, interfaces, data structures, security, declarations, functions, style, logging, imports, generics, and testing
Includes automated pre-review checks via gofmt , go vet , and golangci-lint to catch mechanical issues before manual review
Organizes findings by severity (must-fix, should-fix, nit) using a consistent t
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiongo-code-reviewExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add cxuu/golang-skills --skill go-code-reviewFetches go-code-review from cxuu/golang-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/go-code-review
Restart Cursor to activate go-code-review. Access via /go-code-reviewin your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
code-review-excellence
awesome-skills/code-review-skill · Productivity · 2 shared tags
sqlalchemy-alembic-expert-best-practices-code-review
wispbit-ai/skills · Productivity · 2 shared tags
postgresql-expert-best-practices-code-review
wispbit-ai/skills · Productivity · 2 shared tags
improve
shadcn/improve · code · tag: code
no-mistakes
kunchenguid/no-mistakes · devops · tag: code
clean-code
pproenca/dot-skills · Productivity · tag: code
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: go-code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Keeps context tight: go-code-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
go-code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in go-code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
We added go-code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
I recommend go-code-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: go-code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added go-code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Registry listing for go-code-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
go-code-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 58