testing-strategies

supercent-io/skills-template · updated May 21, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/supercent-io/skills-template --skill testing-strategies
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Comprehensive testing strategy design covering unit, integration, E2E testing, and TDD practices.

  • Implements test pyramid structure with recommended ratios: 70% unit tests, 20% integration, 10% E2E tests
  • Provides Given-When-Then patterns for unit testing, mocking strategies for external dependencies, and API endpoint testing examples
  • Includes E2E testing guidance using Playwright for complete user flow validation and TDD red-green-refactor cycle methodology
  • Covers CI/CD integratio
skill.md

Testing Strategies

When to use this skill

  • New project: define a testing strategy
  • Quality issues: bugs happen frequently
  • Before refactoring: build a safety net
  • CI/CD setup: automated tests

Instructions

Step 1: Understand the Test Pyramid

       /\
      /E2E\          ← few (slow, expensive)
     /______\
    /        \
   /Integration\    ← medium
  /____________\
 /              \
/   Unit Tests   \  ← many (fast, inexpensive)
/________________\

Ratio guide:

  • Unit: 70%
  • Integration: 20%
  • E2E: 10%

Step 2: Unit testing strategy

Given-When-Then pattern:

describe('calculateDiscount', () => {
  it('should apply 10% discount for orders over $100', () => {
    // Given: setup
    const order = { total: 150, customerId: '123' };

    // When: perform action
    const discount = calculateDiscount(order);

    // Then: verify result
    expect(discount).toBe(15);
  });

  it('should not apply discount for orders under $100', () => {
    const order = { total: 50, customerId: '123' };
    const discount = calculateDiscount(order);
    expect(discount).toBe(0);
  });

  it('should throw error for invalid order', () => {
    const order = { total: -10, customerId: '123' };
    expect(() => calculateDiscount(order)).toThrow('Invalid order');
  });
});

Mocking strategy:

// Mock external dependencies
jest.mock('../services/emailService');
import { sendEmail } from '../services/emailService';

describe('UserService', () => {
  it('should send welcome email on registration', async () => {
    // Arrange
    const mockSendEmail = sendEmail as jest.MockedFunction<typeof sendEmail>;
    mockSendEmail.mockResolvedValueOnce(true);

    // Act
    await userService.register({ email: '[email protected]', password: 'pass' });

    // Assert
    expect(mockSendEmail).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
      to: '[email protected]',
      subject: 'Welcome!',
      body: expect.any(String)
    });
  });
});

Step 3: Integration Testing

API endpoint tests:

describe('POST /api/users', () => {
  beforeEach(async () => {
    await db.user.deleteMany();  // Clean DB
  });

  it('should create user with valid data', async () => {
    const response = await request(app)
      .post('/api/users')
      .send({
        email: '[email protected]',
        username: 'testuser',
        password: 'Password123!'
      });

    expect(response.status).toBe(201);
    expect(response.body.user).toMatchObject({
      email: '[email protected]',
      username: 'testuser'
    });

    // Verify it was actually saved to the DB
    const user = await db.user.findUnique({ where: { email: '[email protected]' } });
    expect(user).toBeTruthy();
  });

  it('should reject duplicate email', async () => {
    // Create first user
    await request(app)
      .post('/api/users')
      .send({ email: '[email protected]', username: 'user1', password: 'Pass123!' });

    // Attempt duplicate
    const response = await request(app)
      .post('/api/users')
      .send({ email: '[email protected]', username: 'user2', password: 'Pass123!' });

    expect(response.status).toBe(409);
  });
});

Step 4: E2E Testing (Playwright)

import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';

test.describe('User Registration Flow', () => {
  test('should complete full registration process', async ({ page }) => {
    // 1. Visit homepage
    await page.goto('http://localhost:3000');

    // 2. Click Sign Up button
    await page.click('text=Sign Up')
how to use testing-strategies

How to use testing-strategies on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add testing-strategies
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/supercent-io/skills-template --skill testing-strategies

The skills CLI fetches testing-strategies from GitHub repository supercent-io/skills-template and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/testing-strategies

Reload or restart Cursor to activate testing-strategies. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /testing-strategies) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.772 reviews
  • James Bhatia· Dec 28, 2024

    testing-strategies fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 24, 2024

    testing-strategies fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Nikhil Tandon· Dec 24, 2024

    We added testing-strategies from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Xiao Perez· Dec 16, 2024

    Keeps context tight: testing-strategies is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Mia Gill· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for testing-strategies matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Liam Smith· Dec 8, 2024

    testing-strategies reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Olivia Reddy· Nov 27, 2024

    I recommend testing-strategies for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Henry Bhatia· Nov 19, 2024

    testing-strategies is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 15, 2024

    testing-strategies is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Mia Ghosh· Nov 15, 2024

    testing-strategies has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 72

1 / 8