Generate comprehensive test plans, test cases, regression suites, and bug reports with Figma design validation.
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example: Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example: Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example: Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Time estimate: 15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Prerequisites
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add softaworks/agent-toolkit --skill qa-test-plannerCompatible with
Supported agents
Create structured test plans with scope, strategy, entry/exit criteria, risk assessment, and timelines
Generate manual test cases with step-by-step instructions, expected results, preconditions, and priority levels
Build regression test suites (smoke, targeted, full) with execution order and pass/fail criteria
Validate UI implementations against Figma designs with compon
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionqa-test-plannerExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add softaworks/agent-toolkit --skill qa-test-plannerFetches qa-test-planner from softaworks/agent-toolkit and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/qa-test-planner
Restart Cursor to activate qa-test-planner. Access via /qa-test-plannerin your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
c4-architecture
softaworks/agent-toolkit · Productivity · same repo
frontend-to-backend-requirements
softaworks/agent-toolkit · Frontend · same repo
crafting-effective-readmes
softaworks/agent-toolkit · Productivity · same repo
test-cases
cexll/myclaude · Testing · tag: test
playwright-generate-test
github/awesome-copilot · Testing · tag: test
dart-test-fundamentals
kevmoo/dash_skills · Testing · tag: test
I recommend qa-test-planner for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: qa-test-planner is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Useful defaults in qa-test-planner — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Useful defaults in qa-test-planner — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
qa-test-planner has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Registry listing for qa-test-planner matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
qa-test-planner has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Registry listing for qa-test-planner matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: qa-test-planner is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: qa-test-planner is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 45