clean-code▌
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Code review and refactoring guidance based on Robert C. Martin's Clean Code principles.
- ›Covers nine core areas: meaningful naming conventions, function design (size, single responsibility, argument limits), comment best practices, formatting standards, object and data structure patterns, error handling strategies, unit testing discipline, class design, and code smell identification
- ›Provides actionable guidance for writing new code, reviewing pull requests, refactoring legacy code, and e
Clean Code Skill
This skill embodies the principles of "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob). Use it to transform "code that works" into "code that is clean."
🧠 Core Philosophy
"Code is clean if it can be read, and enhanced by a developer other than its original author." — Grady Booch
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Writing new code: To ensure high quality from the start.
- Reviewing Pull Requests: To provide constructive, principle-based feedback.
- Refactoring legacy code: To identify and remove code smells.
- Improving team standards: To align on industry-standard best practices.
1. Meaningful Names
- Use Intention-Revealing Names:
elapsedTimeInDaysinstead ofd. - Avoid Disinformation: Don't use
accountListif it's actually aMap. - Make Meaningful Distinctions: Avoid
ProductDatavsProductInfo. - Use Pronounceable/Searchable Names: Avoid
genymdhms. - Class Names: Use nouns (
Customer,WikiPage). AvoidManager,Data. - Method Names: Use verbs (
postPayment,deletePage).
2. Functions
- Small!: Functions should be shorter than you think.
- Do One Thing: A function should do only one thing, and do it well.
- One Level of Abstraction: Don't mix high-level business logic with low-level details (like regex).
- Descriptive Names:
isPasswordValidis better thancheck. - Arguments: 0 is ideal, 1-2 is okay, 3+ requires a very strong justification.
- No Side Effects: Functions shouldn't secretly change global state.
3. Comments
- Don't Comment Bad Code—Rewrite It: Most comments are a sign of failure to express ourselves in code.
- Explain Yourself in Code:
vs# Check if employee is eligible for full benefits if employee.flags & HOURLY and employee.age > 65:if employee.isEligibleForFullBenefits(): - Good Comments: Legal, Informative (regex intent), Clarification (external libraries), TODOs.
- Bad Comments: Mumbling, Redundant, Misleading, Mandated, Noise, Position Markers.
4. Formatting
- The Newspaper Metaphor: High-level concepts at the top, details at the bottom.
- Vertical Density: Related lines should be close to each other.
- Distance: Variables should be declared near their usage.
- Indentation: Essential for structural readability.
5. Objects and Data Structures
- Data Abstraction: Hide the implementation behind interfaces.
- The Law of Demeter: A module should not know about the innards of the objects it manipulates. Avoid
a.getB().getC().doSomething(). - Data Transfer Objects (DTO): Classes with public variables and no functions.
6. Error Handling
- Use Exceptions instead of Return Codes: Keeps logic clean.
- Write Try-Catch-Finally First: Defines the scope of the operation.
- Don't Return Null: It forces the caller to check for null every time.
- Don't Pass Null: Leads to
NullPointerException.
7. Unit Tests
- The Three Laws of TDD:
- Don't write production code until you have a failing unit test.
- Don't write more of a unit test than is sufficient to fail.
- Don't write more production code than is sufficient to pass the failing test.
- F.I.R.S.T. Principles: Fast, Independent, Repeatable, Self-Validating, Timely.
8. Classes
- Small!: Classes should have a single responsibility (SRP).
- The Stepdown Rule: We want the code to read like a top-down narrative.
9. Smells and Heuristics
- Rigidity: Hard to change.
- Fragility: Breaks in many places.
- Immobility: Hard to reuse.
- Viscosity: Hard to do the right thing.
- Needless Complexity/Repetition.
🛠️ Implementation Checklist
- Is this function smaller than 20 lines?
- Does this function do exactly one thing?
- Are all names searchable and intention-revealing?
- Have I avoided comments by making the code clearer?
- Am I passing too many arguments?
- Is there a failing test for this change?
How to use clean-code on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add clean-code
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches clean-code from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate clean-code. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /clean-code) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★32 reviews- ★★★★★Aarav Harris· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: clean-code is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 16, 2024
clean-code has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 12, 2024
clean-code is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Tariq Desai· Nov 23, 2024
clean-code fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Fatima Thompson· Nov 19, 2024
clean-code is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 7, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: clean-code is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Oct 26, 2024
We added clean-code from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Zara Ndlovu· Oct 14, 2024
clean-code is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Luis Sharma· Oct 10, 2024
clean-code fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Tariq Jackson· Sep 25, 2024
clean-code reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 32