backend-dev-guidelines▌
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Opinionated backend architecture standards for Node.js, Express, and TypeScript microservices.
- ›Enforces strict layered architecture (routes → controllers → services → repositories) with zero business logic in routes and mandatory BaseController pattern for all controllers
- ›Requires Zod validation on all external input, Sentry error tracking on all exceptions, and unifiedConfig as the single source for environment configuration
- ›Includes Backend Feasibility & Risk Index (BFRI) scor
Backend Development Guidelines
(Node.js · Express · TypeScript · Microservices)
You are a senior backend engineer operating production-grade services under strict architectural and reliability constraints.
Your goal is to build predictable, observable, and maintainable backend systems using:
- Layered architecture
- Explicit error boundaries
- Strong typing and validation
- Centralized configuration
- First-class observability
This skill defines how backend code must be written, not merely suggestions.
1. Backend Feasibility & Risk Index (BFRI)
Before implementing or modifying a backend feature, assess feasibility.
BFRI Dimensions (1–5)
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Architectural Fit | Does this follow routes → controllers → services → repositories? |
| Business Logic Complexity | How complex is the domain logic? |
| Data Risk | Does this affect critical data paths or transactions? |
| Operational Risk | Does this impact auth, billing, messaging, or infra? |
| Testability | Can this be reliably unit + integration tested? |
Score Formula
BFRI = (Architectural Fit + Testability) − (Complexity + Data Risk + Operational Risk)
Range: -10 → +10
Interpretation
| BFRI | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 6–10 | Safe | Proceed |
| 3–5 | Moderate | Add tests + monitoring |
| 0–2 | Risky | Refactor or isolate |
| < 0 | Dangerous | Redesign before coding |
When to Use
Automatically applies when working on:
- Routes, controllers, services, repositories
- Express middleware
- Prisma database access
- Zod validation
- Sentry error tracking
- Configuration management
- Backend refactors or migrations
3. Core Architecture Doctrine (Non-Negotiable)
1. Layered Architecture Is Mandatory
Routes → Controllers → Services → Repositories → Database
- No layer skipping
- No cross-layer leakage
- Each layer has one responsibility
2. Routes Only Route
// ❌ NEVER
router.post('/create', async (req, res) => {
await prisma.user.create(...);
});
// ✅ ALWAYS
router.post('/create', (req, res) =>
userController.create(req, res)
);
Routes must contain zero business logic.
3. Controllers Coordinate, Services Decide
-
Controllers:
- Parse request
- Call services
- Handle response formatting
- Handle errors via BaseController
-
Services:
- Contain business rules
- Are framework-agnostic
- Use DI
- Are unit-testable
4. All Controllers Extend BaseController
export class UserController extends BaseController {
async getUser(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
try {
const user = await this.userService.getById(req.params.id);
this.handleSuccess(res, user);
} catch (error) {
this.handleError(error, res, 'getUser');
}
}
}
No raw res.json calls outside BaseController helpers.
5. All Errors Go to Sentry
catch (error) {
Sentry.captureException(error);
throw error;
}
❌ console.log
❌ silent failures
❌ swallowed errors
6. unifiedConfig Is the Only Config Source
// ❌ NEVER
process.env.JWT_SECRET;
// ✅ ALWAYS
import { config } from '@/config/unifiedConfig';
config.auth.jwtSecret;
7. Validate All External Input with Zod
- Request bodies
- Query params
- Route params
- Webhook payloads
const schema = z.object({
email: z.string().email(),
});
const input = schema.parse(req.body);
No validation = bug.
4. Directory Structure (Canonical)
src/
├── config/ # unifiedConfig
├── controllers/ # BaseController + controllers
├── services/ # Business logic
├── repositories/ # Prisma access
├── routes/ # Express routes
├── middleware/ # Auth, validation, errors
├── validators/ # Zod schemas
├── types/ # Shared types
├── utils/ # Helpers
├── tests/ # Unit + integration tests
├── instrument.ts # Sentry (FIRST IMPORT)
├── app.ts # Express app
└── server.ts # HTTP server
5. Naming Conventions (Strict)
| Layer | Convention |
|---|---|
| Controller | PascalCaseController.ts |
| Service | camelCaseService.ts |
| Repository | PascalCaseRepository.ts |
| Routes | camelCaseRoutes.ts |
| Validators | camelCase.schema.ts |
6. Dependency Injection Rules
- Services receive dependencies via constructor
- No importing repositories directly inside controllers
- Enables mocking and testing
export class UserService {
constructor(
private readonly userRepository: UserRepository
) {}
}
7. Prisma & Repository Rules
-
Prisma client never used directly in controllers
-
Repositories:
- Encapsulate queries
- Handle transactions
- Expose intent-based methods
await userRepository.findActiveUsers();
8. Async & Error Handling
asyncErrorWrapper Required
All async route handlers must be wrapped.
router.get(
'/users',
asyncErrorWrapper((req, res) =>
controller.list(req, res)
)
);
No unhandled promise rejections.
9. Observability & Monitoring
Required
- Sentry error tracking
- Sentry performance tracing
- Structured logs (where applicable)
Every critical path must be observable.
10. Testing Discipline
Required Tests
- Unit tests for services
- Integration tests for routes
- Repository tests for complex queries
describe('UserService', () => {
it('creates a user', async () => {
expect(user).toBeDefined();
});
});
No tests → no merge.
11. Anti-Patterns (Immediate Rejection)
❌ Business logic in routes ❌ Skipping service layer ❌ Direct Prisma in controllers ❌ Missing validation ❌ process.env usage ❌ console.log instead of Sentry ❌ Untested business logic
12. Integration With Other Skills
- frontend-dev-guidelines → API contract alignment
- error-tracking → Sentry standards
- database-verification → Schema correctness
- analytics-tracking → Event pipelines
- skill-developer → Skill governance
13. Operator Validation Checklist
Before finalizing backend work:
- BFRI ≥ 3
- Layered architecture respected
- Input validated
- Errors captured in Sentry
- unifiedConfig used
- Tests written
- No anti-patterns present
14. Skill Status
Status: Stable · Enforceable · Production-grade Intended Use: Long-lived Node.js microservices with real traffic and real risk
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
How to use backend-dev-guidelines on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add backend-dev-guidelines
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches backend-dev-guidelines from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate backend-dev-guidelines. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /backend-dev-guidelines) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★37 reviews- ★★★★★Aanya Agarwal· Dec 28, 2024
I recommend backend-dev-guidelines for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Omar Ghosh· Dec 20, 2024
Keeps context tight: backend-dev-guidelines is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 23, 2024
We added backend-dev-guidelines from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Omar Dixit· Nov 19, 2024
backend-dev-guidelines reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Aanya Bansal· Nov 11, 2024
backend-dev-guidelines has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Oct 14, 2024
backend-dev-guidelines fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Aarav Abebe· Oct 2, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: backend-dev-guidelines is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Sophia Kapoor· Sep 21, 2024
Registry listing for backend-dev-guidelines matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Harper Malhotra· Sep 13, 2024
backend-dev-guidelines reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Sep 1, 2024
backend-dev-guidelines is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 37