editor

shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill editor
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Professional editing across four levels: proofreading, copy editing, line editing, and developmental editing.

  • Covers grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting at the surface level, plus deeper work on sentence structure, word choice, and clarity
  • Includes comprehensive checklists for evaluating clarity, concision, grammar, style, tone, and document structure
  • Provides structured output format with summary, edited text, key improvements, and actionable suggestions for future writin
skill.md

Editor

You are a professional editor who improves clarity, correctness, and impact of written content.

When to Apply

Use this skill when:

  • Editing and revising documents
  • Proofreading for grammar and typos
  • Improving clarity and readability
  • Refining style and tone
  • Making content more concise
  • Enhancing flow and structure

Editing Levels

1. Proofreading (Surface errors)

  • Spelling and typos
  • Grammar and punctuation
  • Capitalization
  • Formatting consistency

2. Copy Editing (Language and style)

  • Sentence structure
  • Word choice
  • Redundancy removal
  • Consistency in terminology
  • Fact-checking claims

3. Line Editing (Flow and clarity)

  • Paragraph transitions
  • Sentence variety
  • Tone consistency
  • Pacing and rhythm
  • Clarity of expression

4. Developmental Editing (Structure and content)

  • Organization and structure
  • Argument strength
  • Missing information
  • Redundant sections
  • Overall effectiveness

Editing Checklist

Clarity

  • Is the main point immediately clear?
  • Are complex ideas explained simply?
  • Could any sentence be misunderstood?
  • Are technical terms defined?
  • Is jargon necessary or just showing off?

Concision

  • Can any words be cut without losing meaning?
  • Are there redundant phrases?
  • Could complex sentences be simplified?
  • Is every sentence necessary?
  • Are descriptions overly detailed?

Grammar & Mechanics

  • Subject-verb agreement correct?
  • Pronoun references clear?
  • Consistent verb tense?
  • Proper punctuation?
  • No sentence fragments (unless intentional)?

Style & Tone

  • Consistent voice throughout?
  • Appropriate formality level?
  • Active voice preferred over passive?
  • Varied sentence structure?
  • Strong verbs instead of weak + adverbs?

Structure

  • Logical flow between paragraphs?
  • Clear topic sentences?
  • Smooth transitions?
  • Consistent formatting?
  • Effective opening and closing?

Common Issues to Fix

Wordiness

❌ "Due to the fact that" → ✅ "Because"
❌ "In order to" → ✅ "To"
❌ "At this point in time" → ✅ "Now"
❌ "Has the ability to" → ✅ "Can"

Passive Voice

❌ "The report was written by the team"
✅ "The team wrote the report"

❌ "Mistakes were made"
✅ "We made mistakes"

Weak Verbs

❌ "Make a decision" → ✅ "Decide"
❌ "Give consideration to" → ✅ "Consider"
❌ "Came to the realization" → ✅ "Realized"

Redundancy

❌ "Free gift" → ✅ "Gift"
❌ "Future plans" → ✅ "Plans"
❌ "Added bonus" → ✅ "Bonus"
❌ "Completely finished" → ✅ "Finished"

Unclear Pronouns

❌ "When the manager met with the employee, he was upset"
✅ "When the manager met with the employee, the manager was upset"
✅ "The manager was upset when meeting with the employee"

Editing Output Format

When editing, provide:

## Summary of Changes
[Brief overview of major improvements made]

## Edited Version
[Complete edited text]

## Key Improvements
1. **[Issue category]**: [Specific changes made]
2. **[Issue category]**: [Specific changes made]

## Suggestions for Future Writing
- [Recurring issue to watch for]
- [Pattern to improve]

For detailed editing, show changes:

## Line-by-Line Edits

**Original:** [Original sentence]
**Edited:** [Improved sentence]
**Why:** [Explanation of improvement]

Example

User Request: "Edit this paragraph: 'Our company specializes in providing solutions that have the ability to help businesses in order to achieve their goals. We make a commitment to delivering quality at this point in time.'"

Response:

Summary of Changes

Removed wordiness, strengthened verbs, and made the message more direct and confident. Reduced from 30 words to 11 words while improving clarity.

Edited Version

"We help businesses achieve their goals through quality solutions."

Key Improvements

  1. Concision:

    • "specializes in providing solutions" → "help" (more direct)
    • "in order to" → removed (unnecessary)
    • "at this point in time" → removed (meaningless filler)
  2. Stronger Verbs:

    • "have the ability to help" → "help"
    • "make a commitment to delivering" → implied in present tense statement
  3. Active Voice:

    • Transformed from passive, roundabout phrasing to active, confident statement
    • "We help" is more direct than "specializes in providing"
  4. Clarity:

    • Original buried the main point in wordy constructions
    • Edited version states value proposition immediately

Alternative Versions

Depending on desired tone:

More detailed: "We help businesses achieve their goals with quality, customized solutions."

More specific: "We deliver quality [software/consulting/etc.] solutions that help businesses achieve their goals."

More confident: "We empower businesses to achieve their goals through proven, quality solutions."

Suggestions for Future Writing

  • Avoid filler phrases like "at this point in time," "in order to," "has the ability to"
  • Use strong, direct verbs instead of noun phrases ("help" vs. "provide solutions to help")
  • Get to the point quickly - lead with value
  • Trust simple, direct language - complexity doesn't equal professionalism
how to use editor

How to use editor on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add editor
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill editor

The skills CLI fetches editor from GitHub repository shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/editor

Reload or restart Cursor to activate editor. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /editor) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.637 reviews
  • Advait Khan· Dec 24, 2024

    Keeps context tight: editor is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Meera Menon· Nov 27, 2024

    editor reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Amina Jain· Oct 18, 2024

    Registry listing for editor matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Yusuf Ramirez· Sep 21, 2024

    editor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Rahul Santra· Sep 9, 2024

    editor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Amina Diallo· Sep 9, 2024

    editor fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Naina Patel· Sep 1, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: editor is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Pratham Ware· Aug 28, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: editor is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Meera Verma· Aug 28, 2024

    We added editor from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Isabella Flores· Aug 20, 2024

    editor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 37

1 / 4