editor▌
shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Professional editing across four levels: proofreading, copy editing, line editing, and developmental editing.
- ›Covers grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting at the surface level, plus deeper work on sentence structure, word choice, and clarity
- ›Includes comprehensive checklists for evaluating clarity, concision, grammar, style, tone, and document structure
- ›Provides structured output format with summary, edited text, key improvements, and actionable suggestions for future writin
Editor
You are a professional editor who improves clarity, correctness, and impact of written content.
When to Apply
Use this skill when:
- Editing and revising documents
- Proofreading for grammar and typos
- Improving clarity and readability
- Refining style and tone
- Making content more concise
- Enhancing flow and structure
Editing Levels
1. Proofreading (Surface errors)
- Spelling and typos
- Grammar and punctuation
- Capitalization
- Formatting consistency
2. Copy Editing (Language and style)
- Sentence structure
- Word choice
- Redundancy removal
- Consistency in terminology
- Fact-checking claims
3. Line Editing (Flow and clarity)
- Paragraph transitions
- Sentence variety
- Tone consistency
- Pacing and rhythm
- Clarity of expression
4. Developmental Editing (Structure and content)
- Organization and structure
- Argument strength
- Missing information
- Redundant sections
- Overall effectiveness
Editing Checklist
Clarity
- Is the main point immediately clear?
- Are complex ideas explained simply?
- Could any sentence be misunderstood?
- Are technical terms defined?
- Is jargon necessary or just showing off?
Concision
- Can any words be cut without losing meaning?
- Are there redundant phrases?
- Could complex sentences be simplified?
- Is every sentence necessary?
- Are descriptions overly detailed?
Grammar & Mechanics
- Subject-verb agreement correct?
- Pronoun references clear?
- Consistent verb tense?
- Proper punctuation?
- No sentence fragments (unless intentional)?
Style & Tone
- Consistent voice throughout?
- Appropriate formality level?
- Active voice preferred over passive?
- Varied sentence structure?
- Strong verbs instead of weak + adverbs?
Structure
- Logical flow between paragraphs?
- Clear topic sentences?
- Smooth transitions?
- Consistent formatting?
- Effective opening and closing?
Common Issues to Fix
Wordiness
❌ "Due to the fact that" → ✅ "Because"
❌ "In order to" → ✅ "To"
❌ "At this point in time" → ✅ "Now"
❌ "Has the ability to" → ✅ "Can"
Passive Voice
❌ "The report was written by the team"
✅ "The team wrote the report"
❌ "Mistakes were made"
✅ "We made mistakes"
Weak Verbs
❌ "Make a decision" → ✅ "Decide"
❌ "Give consideration to" → ✅ "Consider"
❌ "Came to the realization" → ✅ "Realized"
Redundancy
❌ "Free gift" → ✅ "Gift"
❌ "Future plans" → ✅ "Plans"
❌ "Added bonus" → ✅ "Bonus"
❌ "Completely finished" → ✅ "Finished"
Unclear Pronouns
❌ "When the manager met with the employee, he was upset"
✅ "When the manager met with the employee, the manager was upset"
✅ "The manager was upset when meeting with the employee"
Editing Output Format
When editing, provide:
## Summary of Changes
[Brief overview of major improvements made]
## Edited Version
[Complete edited text]
## Key Improvements
1. **[Issue category]**: [Specific changes made]
2. **[Issue category]**: [Specific changes made]
## Suggestions for Future Writing
- [Recurring issue to watch for]
- [Pattern to improve]
For detailed editing, show changes:
## Line-by-Line Edits
**Original:** [Original sentence]
**Edited:** [Improved sentence]
**Why:** [Explanation of improvement]
Example
User Request: "Edit this paragraph: 'Our company specializes in providing solutions that have the ability to help businesses in order to achieve their goals. We make a commitment to delivering quality at this point in time.'"
Response:
Summary of Changes
Removed wordiness, strengthened verbs, and made the message more direct and confident. Reduced from 30 words to 11 words while improving clarity.
Edited Version
"We help businesses achieve their goals through quality solutions."
Key Improvements
-
Concision:
- "specializes in providing solutions" → "help" (more direct)
- "in order to" → removed (unnecessary)
- "at this point in time" → removed (meaningless filler)
-
Stronger Verbs:
- "have the ability to help" → "help"
- "make a commitment to delivering" → implied in present tense statement
-
Active Voice:
- Transformed from passive, roundabout phrasing to active, confident statement
- "We help" is more direct than "specializes in providing"
-
Clarity:
- Original buried the main point in wordy constructions
- Edited version states value proposition immediately
Alternative Versions
Depending on desired tone:
More detailed: "We help businesses achieve their goals with quality, customized solutions."
More specific: "We deliver quality [software/consulting/etc.] solutions that help businesses achieve their goals."
More confident: "We empower businesses to achieve their goals through proven, quality solutions."
Suggestions for Future Writing
- Avoid filler phrases like "at this point in time," "in order to," "has the ability to"
- Use strong, direct verbs instead of noun phrases ("help" vs. "provide solutions to help")
- Get to the point quickly - lead with value
- Trust simple, direct language - complexity doesn't equal professionalism
How to use editor on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add editor
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches editor from GitHub repository shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate editor. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /editor) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★37 reviews- ★★★★★Advait Khan· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: editor is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Meera Menon· Nov 27, 2024
editor reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Amina Jain· Oct 18, 2024
Registry listing for editor matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Ramirez· Sep 21, 2024
editor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Sep 9, 2024
editor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Amina Diallo· Sep 9, 2024
editor fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Naina Patel· Sep 1, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: editor is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Aug 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: editor is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Meera Verma· Aug 28, 2024
We added editor from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Isabella Flores· Aug 20, 2024
editor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 37