self-improvement▌
pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement across agent tasks.
- ›Logs failures, user corrections, knowledge gaps, and API errors to structured markdown files ( .learnings/ERRORS.md , LEARNINGS.md , FEATURE_REQUESTS.md ) with consistent ID, priority, and metadata
- ›Supports promotion of broadly applicable learnings to project memory files ( CLAUDE.md , AGENTS.md , .github/copilot-instructions.md ) to prevent recurring mistakes
- ›Includes recurring pattern d
Self-Improvement Skill
Install
npx skills add pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills/skills/self-improvement
For CI-only execution, use:
npx skills add pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills/skills/self-improvement-ci
Log learnings and errors to markdown files for continuous improvement. Coding agents can later process these into fixes, and important learnings get promoted to project memory.
Quick Reference
| Situation | Action |
|---|---|
| Command/operation fails | Log to .learnings/ERRORS.md |
| User corrects you | Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category correction |
| User wants missing feature | Log to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md |
| API/external tool fails | Log to .learnings/ERRORS.md with integration details |
| Knowledge was outdated | Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category knowledge_gap |
| Found better approach | Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category best_practice |
| Simplify/Harden recurring patterns | Log/update .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with Source: simplify-and-harden and a stable Pattern-Key |
| Similar to existing entry | Link with **See Also**, consider priority bump |
| Broadly applicable learning | Promote to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and/or .github/copilot-instructions.md |
| Workflow improvements | Promote to AGENTS.md (openclaw workspace) |
| Tool gotchas | Promote to TOOLS.md (openclaw workspace) |
| Behavioral patterns | Promote to SOUL.md (openclaw workspace) |
Setup
Create .learnings/ directory in project root if it doesn't exist:
mkdir -p .learnings
Copy templates from assets/ or create files with headers.
Logging Format
Learning Entry
Append to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md:
## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category
**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: low | medium | high | critical
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config
### Summary
One-line description of what was learned
### Details
Full context: what happened, what was wrong, what's correct
### Suggested Action
Specific fix or improvement to make
### Metadata
- Source: conversation | error | user_feedback
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- Tags: tag1, tag2
- See Also: LRN-20250110-001 (if related to existing entry)
- Pattern-Key: simplify.dead_code | harden.input_validation (optional, for recurring-pattern tracking)
- Recurrence-Count: 1 (optional)
- First-Seen: 2025-01-15 (optional)
- Last-Seen: 2025-01-15 (optional)
---
Error Entry
Append to .learnings/ERRORS.md:
## [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX] skill_or_command_name
**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: high
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config
### Summary
Brief description of what failed
### Error
Actual error message or output
### Context
- Command/operation attempted
- Input or parameters used
- Environment details if relevant
### Suggested Fix
If identifiable, what might resolve this
### Metadata
- Reproducible: yes | no | unknown
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- See Also: ERR-20250110-001 (if recurring)
---
Feature Request Entry
Append to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md:
## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name
**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config
### Requested Capability
What the user wanted to do
### User Context
Why they needed it, what problem they're solving
### Complexity Estimate
simple | medium | complex
### Suggested Implementation
How this could be built, what it might extend
### Metadata
- Frequency: first_time | recurring
- Related Features: existing_feature_name
---
ID Generation
Format: TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX
- TYPE:
LRN(learning),ERR(error),FEAT(feature) - YYYYMMDD: Current date
- XXX: Sequential number or random 3 chars (e.g.,
001,A7B)
Examples: LRN-20250115-001, ERR-20250115-A3F, FEAT-20250115-002
Resolving Entries
When an issue is fixed, update the entry:
- Change
**Status**: pending→**Status**: resolved - Add resolution block after Metadata:
### Resolution
- **Resolved**: 2025-01-16T09:00:00Z
- **Commit/PR**: abc123 or #42
- **Notes**: Brief description of what was done
Other status values:
in_progress- Actively being worked onwont_fix- Decided not to address (add reason in Resolution notes)promoted- Elevated to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md
Promoting to Project Memory
When a learning is broadly applicable (not a one-off fix), promote it to permanent project memory.
When to Promote
- Learning applies across multiple files/features
- Knowledge any contributor (human or AI) should know
- Prevents recurring mistakes
- Documents project-specific conventions
Promotion Targets
| Target | What Belongs There |
|---|---|
CLAUDE.md |
Project facts, conventions, gotchas for all Claude interactions |
AGENTS.md |
Agent-specific workflows, tool usage patterns, automation rules |
.github/copilot-instructions.md |
Project context and conventions for GitHub Copilot |
SOUL.md |
Behavioral guidelines, communication style, principles (openclaw) |
TOOLS.md |
Tool capabilities, usage patterns, integration gotchas (openclaw) |
How to Promote
- Distill the learning into a concise rule or fact
- Add to appropriate section in target file (create file if needed)
- Update original entry:
- Change
**Status**: pending→**Status**: promoted - Add
**Promoted**: CLAUDE.md,AGENTS.md, or.github/copilot-instructions.md
- Change
Promotion Examples
Learning (verbose):
Project uses pnpm workspaces. Attempted
npm installbut failed. Lock file ispnpm-lock.yaml. Must usepnpm install.
In CLAUDE.md (concise):
## Build & Dependencies
- Package manager: pnpm (not npm) - use `pnpm install`
Learning (verbose):
When modifying API endpoints, must regenerate TypeScript client. Forgetting this causes type mismatches at runtime.
In AGENTS.md (actionable):
## After API Changes
1. Regenerate client: `pnpm run generate:api`
2. Check for type errors: `pnpm tsc --noEmit`
Recurring Pattern Detection
If logging something similar to an existing entry:
- Search first:
grep -r "keyword" .learnings/ - Link entries: Add
**See Also**: ERR-20250110-001in Metadata - Bump priority if issue keeps recurring
- Consider systemic fix: Recurring issues often indicate:
- Missing documentation (→ promote to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md)
- Missing automation (→ add to AGENTS.md)
- Architectural problem (→ create tech debt ticket)
Simplify & Harden Feed
Use this workflow to ingest recurring patterns from the simplify-and-harden
skill and turn them into durable prompt guidance.
Ingestion Workflow
- Read
simplify_and_harden.learning_loop.candidatesfrom the task summary. - For each candidate, use
pattern_keyas the stable dedupe key. - Search
.learnings/LEARNINGS.mdfor an existing entry with that key:grep -n "Pattern-Key: <pattern_key>" .learnings/LEARNINGS.md
- If found:
- Increment
Recurrence-Count - Update
Last-Seen - Add
See Alsolinks to related entries/tasks
- Increment
- If not found:
- Create a new
LRN-...entry - Set
Source: simplify-and-harden - Set
Pattern-Key,Recurrence-Count: 1, andFirst-Seen/Last-Seen
- Create a new
Promotion Rule (System Prompt Feedback)
Promote recurring patterns into agent context/system prompt files when all are true:
Recurrence-Count >= 3- Seen across at least 2 distinct tasks
- Occurred within a 30-day window
Promotion targets:
CLAUDE.mdAGENTS.md.github/copilot-instructions.mdSOUL.md/TOOLS.mdfor openclaw workspace-level guidance when applicable
Write promoted rules as short prevention rules (what to do before/while coding), not long incident write-ups.
Periodic Review
Review .learnings/ at natural breakpoints:
When to Review
- Before starting a new major task
- After completing a feature
- When working in an area with past learnings
- Weekly during active development
Quick Status Check
# Count pending items
grep -h "Status\*\*: pending" .learnings/*.md | wc -l
# List pending high-priority items
grep -B5 "Priority\*\*: high" .learnings/*.md | grep "^## \["
# Find learnings for a specific area
grep -l "Area\*\*: backend" .learnings/*.md
Review Actions
- Resolve fixed items
- Promote applicable learnings
- Link related entries
- Escalate recurring issues
Detection Triggers
Automatically log when you notice:
Corrections (→ learning with correction category):
- "No, that's not right..."
- "Actually, it should be..."
- "You're wrong about..."
- "That's outdated..."
Feature Requests (→ feature request):
- "Can you also..."
- "I wish you could..."
- "Is there a way to..."
- "Why can't you..."
Knowledge Gaps (→ learning with knowledge_gap category):
- User provides information you didn't know
- Documentation you referenced is outdated
- API behavior differs from your understanding
Errors (→ error entry):
- Command returns non-zero exit code
- Exception or stack trace
- Unexpected output or behavior
- Timeout or connection failure
Priority Guidelines
| Priority | When to Use |
|---|---|
critical |
Blocks core functionality, data loss risk, security issue |
high |
Significant impact, affects common workflows, recurring issue |
medium |
Moderate impact, workaround exists |
low |
Minor inconvenience, edge case, nice-to-have |
Area Tags
Use to filter learnings by codebase region:
| Area | Scope |
|---|---|
frontend |
UI, components, client-side code |
backend |
API, services, server-side code |
infra |
CI/CD, deployment, Docker, cloud |
tests |
Test files, testing utilities, coverage |
docs |
Documentation, comments, READMEs |
config |
Configuration files, environment, settings |
Best Practices
- Log immediately - context is freshest right after the issue
- Be specific - future agents need to understand quickly
- Include reproduction steps - especially for errors
- Link related files - makes fixes easier
- Suggest concrete fixes - not just "investigate"
- Use consistent categories - enables filtering
- Promote aggressively - if in doubt, add to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md
- Review regularly - stale learnings lose value
Gitignore Options
Keep learnings local (per-developer):
.learnings/
Track learnings in repo (team-wide): Don't add to .gitignore - learnings become shared knowledge.
Hybrid (track templates, ignore entries):
.learnings/*.md
!.learnings/.gitkeep
Hook Integration
Enable automatic reminders through agent hooks. This is opt-in
How to use self-improvement on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add self-improvement
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches self-improvement from GitHub repository pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate self-improvement. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /self-improvement) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★47 reviews- ★★★★★Mateo Wang· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for self-improvement matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in self-improvement — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Zara Kim· Dec 4, 2024
self-improvement is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Emma Martin· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: self-improvement is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Hiroshi Mehta· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in self-improvement — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Mateo Liu· Nov 23, 2024
I recommend self-improvement for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 15, 2024
self-improvement is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sakura Mehta· Oct 14, 2024
I recommend self-improvement for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Liam Nasser· Oct 14, 2024
Useful defaults in self-improvement — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Oct 6, 2024
Keeps context tight: self-improvement is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 47