compatibility-testing▌
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
<default_to_action>
- ›When validating cross-browser/platform compatibility:
Compatibility Testing
<default_to_action> When validating cross-browser/platform compatibility:
- DEFINE browser matrix (cover 95%+ of users)
- TEST responsive breakpoints (mobile, tablet, desktop)
- RUN in parallel across browsers/devices
- USE cloud services for device coverage (BrowserStack, Sauce Labs)
- COMPARE visual screenshots across platforms
Quick Compatibility Checklist:
- Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge (latest + N-1)
- Mobile Safari (iOS), Mobile Chrome (Android)
- Screen sizes: 320px, 768px, 1920px
- Test on actual target devices for critical flows
Critical Success Factors:
- Users access from 100+ browser/device combinations
- Test where users are, not where you develop
- Cloud testing reduces 10 hours to 15 minutes </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Before release
- After CSS/layout changes
- Launching in new markets
- Responsive design validation
Cross-Browser with Playwright
// playwright.config.ts
import { defineConfig, devices } from '@playwright/test';
export default defineConfig({
projects: [
{ name: 'chromium', use: { ...devices['Desktop Chrome'] } },
{ name: 'firefox', use: { ...devices['Desktop Firefox'] } },
{ name: 'webkit', use: { ...devices['Desktop Safari'] } },
{ name: 'mobile-chrome', use: { ...devices['Pixel 5'] } },
{ name: 'mobile-safari', use: { ...devices['iPhone 12'] } }
]
});
// Run: npx playwright test --project=chromium --project=firefox
Cloud Testing Integration
// BrowserStack configuration
const capabilities = {
'browserName': 'Chrome',
'browser_version': '118.0',
'os': 'Windows',
'os_version': '11',
'browserstack.user': process.env.BROWSERSTACK_USER,
'browserstack.key': process.env.BROWSERSTACK_KEY
};
// Parallel execution across devices
const deviceMatrix = [
{ os: 'Windows', browser: 'Chrome' },
{ os: 'OS X', browser: 'Safari' },
{ os: 'Android', device: 'Samsung Galaxy S24' },
{ os: 'iOS', device: 'iPhone 15' }
];
Agent-Driven Compatibility Testing
// Cross-platform visual comparison
await Task("Compatibility Testing", {
url: 'https://example.com',
browsers: ['chrome', 'firefox', 'safari', 'edge'],
devices: ['desktop', 'tablet', 'mobile'],
platform: 'browserstack',
parallel: true
}, "qe-visual-tester");
// Returns:
// {
// combinations: 12, // 4 browsers × 3 devices
// passed: 11,
// differences: [{ browser: 'safari', device: 'mobile', diff: 0.02 }]
// }
Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/compatibility-testing/
├── browser-matrix/* - Browser/version configurations
├── device-matrix/* - Device configurations
├── visual-diffs/* - Cross-browser visual differences
└── reports/* - Compatibility reports
Fleet Coordination
const compatFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'compatibility-testing',
agents: [
'qe-visual-tester', // Visual comparison
'qe-test-executor', // Cross-browser execution
'qe-performance-tester' // Performance by platform
],
topology: 'parallel'
});
Related Skills
- mobile-testing - Mobile-specific testing
- visual-testing-advanced - Visual regression
- accessibility-testing - Cross-platform a11y
Remember
Cover 95%+ of your user base. Use analytics to identify actual browser/device usage. Don't waste time on browsers nobody uses.
With Agents: Agents orchestrate parallel cross-browser testing across cloud platforms. qe-visual-tester catches visual inconsistencies across platforms automatically.
How to use compatibility-testing on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add compatibility-testing
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches compatibility-testing from GitHub repository proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate compatibility-testing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /compatibility-testing) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★39 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for compatibility-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Amelia Agarwal· Dec 12, 2024
compatibility-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 19, 2024
compatibility-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Thompson· Nov 3, 2024
I recommend compatibility-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Anaya Gill· Oct 22, 2024
compatibility-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 10, 2024
I recommend compatibility-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Sep 21, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: compatibility-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Arjun Dixit· Sep 21, 2024
compatibility-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Jin Mehta· Sep 9, 2024
compatibility-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Mateo Singh· Aug 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: compatibility-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 39