migrate▌
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Safe migrations for frameworks, languages, and infrastructure.
/migrate - Migration Workflow
Safe migrations for frameworks, languages, and infrastructure.
When to Use
- "Migrate to X"
- "Upgrade framework"
- "Move from X to Y"
- "Upgrade Python/Node/etc."
- "Migrate database"
- Framework version upgrades
- Language migrations
- Infrastructure changes
Workflow Overview
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌────────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ oracle │───▶│ phoenix │───▶│ plan- │───▶│ kraken │───▶│ surveyor │
│ │ │ │ │ agent │ │ │ │ │
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └────────────┘ └──────────┘ └───────────┘
Research Analyze Plan Implement Review
target current migration changes migration
Agent Sequence
| # | Agent | Role | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | oracle | Research target framework/version | Research report |
| 2 | phoenix | Analyze current codebase for migration impact | Impact analysis |
| 3 | plan-agent | Create phased migration plan | Migration plan |
| 4 | kraken | Implement migration changes | Code changes |
| 5 | surveyor | Review migration for completeness | Migration review |
Why Extra Gates?
Migrations are high-risk:
- Breaking changes between versions
- Dependency conflicts
- Data format changes
- API deprecations
The extra research and review phases catch issues early.
Execution
Phase 1: Research Target
Task(
subagent_type="oracle",
prompt="""
Research migration target: [TARGET]
Investigate:
- Breaking changes from current version
- New APIs and patterns
- Deprecated features we use
- Migration guides from official docs
- Common pitfalls and solutions
Output: Migration research report
"""
)
Phase 2: Analyze Current State
Task(
subagent_type="phoenix",
prompt="""
Analyze codebase for migration: [FROM] → [TO]
Identify:
- Files using deprecated APIs
- Dependency conflicts
- Patterns that need updating
- Test coverage of affected areas
- Risk areas (critical paths)
Output: Impact analysis with affected files
"""
)
Phase 3: Plan Migration
Task(
subagent_type="plan-agent",
prompt="""
Create migration plan: [FROM] → [TO]
Research: [from oracle]
Impact: [from phoenix]
Plan should:
- Be phased (incremental if possible)
- Each phase independently testable
- Include rollback strategy
- Prioritize critical path stability
Output: Phased migration plan
"""
)
Phase 4: Implement
Task(
subagent_type="kraken",
prompt="""
Implement migration phase: [PHASE_N]
Plan: [from plan-agent]
Requirements:
- Follow plan exactly
- Run tests after each change
- Document any deviations
- Stop if tests fail
Output: Completed phase with test results
"""
)
Phase 5: Review Migration
Task(
subagent_type="surveyor",
prompt="""
Review migration: [FROM] → [TO]
Check:
- All deprecated APIs replaced
- No remaining compatibility shims
- Tests passing
- Performance acceptable
- No security regressions
Output: Migration review report
"""
)
Migration Types
Framework Upgrade
User: /migrate React 17 → 18
→ Full workflow with hooks/concurrent mode changes
Language Version
User: /migrate Python 3.9 → 3.12
→ Focus on new syntax, removed features
Database Migration
User: /migrate MongoDB → PostgreSQL
→ Schema design, data transformation, query rewrite
Infrastructure
User: /migrate AWS → GCP
→ Service mapping, config translation
Example
User: /migrate from Express to Fastify
Claude: Starting /migrate workflow: Express → Fastify
Phase 1: Researching Fastify...
[Spawns oracle]
Key differences:
- Schema-based validation (vs middleware)
- Plugin architecture
- Async/await native
- Different middleware pattern
Phase 2: Analyzing current Express usage...
[Spawns phoenix]
Impact analysis:
- 23 route files to update
- 8 middleware to convert
- 3 plugins need Fastify equivalents
- Test coverage: 78%
Phase 3: Creating migration plan...
[Spawns plan-agent]
Migration Plan: Express → Fastify
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Phase 1: Setup & Core
- Add Fastify alongside Express
- Migrate core server setup
- Run both in parallel
Phase 2: Routes (by domain)
- Migrate auth routes
- Migrate user routes
- Migrate product routes
- ...
Phase 3: Middleware
- Convert error handler
- Convert auth middleware
- Convert logging
Phase 4: Cleanup
- Remove Express
- Remove compatibility layer
- Final testing
Rollback: Keep Express until Phase 4 complete
Phase 4: Implementing Phase 1...
[Spawns kraken]
✅ Fastify server running alongside Express
✅ Core routes migrated
✅ Tests passing
[Continues through phases...]
Phase 5: Reviewing migration...
[Spawns surveyor]
✅ All Express code removed
✅ 23/23 routes migrated
✅ Performance improved (2.1x faster)
✅ No security regressions
Migration complete! Express → Fastify
Incremental Migration
For large codebases, run one phase at a time:
User: /migrate React 17 → 18 --phase 1
[Runs only Phase 1]
User: /migrate React 17 → 18 --phase 2
[Runs Phase 2, reads previous handoff]
Flags
--phase N: Run specific phase only--dry-run: Plan without implementing--rollback: Execute rollback plan--parallel: Run new alongside old (strangler fig)
How to use migrate on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add migrate
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches migrate from GitHub repository parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate migrate. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /migrate) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★34 reviews- ★★★★★Ava Nasser· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for migrate matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 16, 2024
migrate fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Jin Bhatia· Dec 8, 2024
We added migrate from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Michael Jain· Nov 27, 2024
migrate reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Sakura Bhatia· Nov 19, 2024
migrate fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 7, 2024
Registry listing for migrate matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Oct 26, 2024
migrate reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Noah Haddad· Oct 18, 2024
Registry listing for migrate matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Hiroshi Rahman· Oct 10, 2024
We added migrate from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Sep 17, 2024
migrate is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 34