testing-mobile-api-authentication▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Tests authentication and authorization mechanisms in mobile application APIs to identify broken authentication, insecure token management, session fixation, privilege escalation, and IDOR vulnerabilities. Use when performing API security assessments against mobile app backends, testing JWT implementations, evaluating OAuth flows, or assessing session management. Activates for requests involving mobile API auth testing, token security assessment, OAuth mobile flow testing, or API authorization bypass.
| name | testing-mobile-api-authentication |
| description | 'Tests authentication and authorization mechanisms in mobile application APIs to identify broken authentication, insecure token management, session fixation, privilege escalation, and IDOR vulnerabilities. Use when performing API security assessments against mobile app backends, testing JWT implementations, evaluating OAuth flows, or assessing session management. Activates for requests involving mobile API auth testing, token security assessment, OAuth mobile flow testing, or API authorization bypass. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | mobile-security |
| author | mahipal |
| tags | - mobile-security - android - ios - api-security - authentication - penetration-testing |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - PR.AA-05 - ID.RA-01 - DE.CM-09 |
Testing Mobile API Authentication
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Assessing mobile app backend API authentication during penetration tests
- Testing JWT token implementation for common vulnerabilities (none algorithm, weak signing)
- Evaluating OAuth 2.0 / OIDC flows in mobile applications for redirect, PKCE, and scope issues
- Testing for broken object-level authorization (BOLA/IDOR) in API endpoints
Do not use this skill against production APIs without explicit authorization and rate-limiting awareness.
Prerequisites
- Burp Suite or mitmproxy configured as mobile device proxy
- SSL pinning bypassed on target application (if implemented)
- Valid test account credentials for the target application
- Postman or curl for API request crafting
- jwt.io or PyJWT for JWT analysis and manipulation
Workflow
Step 1: Map Authentication Endpoints
Intercept mobile app traffic to identify authentication-related endpoints:
POST /api/v1/auth/login - Initial authentication
POST /api/v1/auth/register - Account registration
POST /api/v1/auth/refresh - Token refresh
POST /api/v1/auth/logout - Session termination
POST /api/v1/auth/forgot-password - Password reset
POST /api/v1/auth/verify-otp - OTP verification
GET /api/v1/auth/me - Authenticated user profile
Step 2: Analyze Token Format and Security
JWT Analysis:
# Decode JWT without verification
echo "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIs..." | cut -d. -f2 | base64 -d 2>/dev/null
# Check for common JWT vulnerabilities:
# 1. None algorithm attack
# Change header to: {"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"}
# Remove signature: header.payload.
# 2. Algorithm confusion (RS256 to HS256)
# If server uses RS256, try HS256 with public key as secret
# 3. Weak signing key
# Use hashcat or jwt-cracker to brute-force HMAC secret
hashcat -m 16500 jwt.txt wordlist.txt
# 4. Expiration bypass
# Modify "exp" claim to future timestamp
Opaque Token Analysis:
- Test token length and entropy
- Check if tokens are sequential/predictable
- Test token reuse after logout
- Verify token invalidation on password change
Step 3: Test Authentication Bypass
# Test missing authentication
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile
# Test with empty/null token
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile \
-H "Authorization: Bearer "
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile \
-H "Authorization: Bearer null"
# Test with expired token (should fail)
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <expired_token>"
# Test token from different user
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/123/profile \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <user_456_token>"
Step 4: Test IDOR / Broken Object-Level Authorization
# Change user ID in request path
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/123/orders \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <user_456_token>"
# Change object ID in request body
curl -X PUT https://api.target.com/api/v1/orders/789 \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <user_456_token>" \
-d '{"status": "cancelled"}'
# Test horizontal privilege escalation
# Access admin endpoints with regular user token
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/admin/users \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <regular_user_token>"
Step 5: Test Session Management
# Test concurrent sessions
# Login from multiple devices simultaneously - should both remain valid?
# Test session invalidation after logout
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST https://api.target.com/api/v1/auth/login \
-d '{"email":"[email protected]","password":"pass"}' | jq -r '.token')
# Logout
curl -X POST https://api.target.com/api/v1/auth/logout \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# Try using the same token (should fail)
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/me \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# Test session invalidation after password change
# Token obtained before password change should be invalidated
Step 6: Test OAuth 2.0 / OIDC Mobile Flows
# Test for authorization code interception
# Check if PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) is enforced
# Test with missing code_verifier parameter
# Test redirect URI manipulation
# Try custom scheme hijacking: myapp://callback
# Test with modified redirect_uri parameter
# Test scope escalation
# Request higher privileges than granted
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| BOLA/IDOR | Broken Object Level Authorization - accessing resources by changing identifiers without server-side authorization checks |
| JWT | JSON Web Token - self-contained authentication token with header, payload, and signature components |
| PKCE | Proof Key for Code Exchange - OAuth 2.0 extension preventing authorization code interception in mobile apps |
| Token Refresh | Mechanism for obtaining new access tokens using long-lived refresh tokens without re-authentication |
| Session Fixation | Attack where adversary sets a known session ID before victim authenticates, then hijacks the session |
Tools & Systems
- Burp Suite: HTTP proxy for intercepting and modifying authentication requests
- jwt_tool: Python tool for testing JWT vulnerabilities (none algorithm, key confusion, claim manipulation)
- Postman: API testing client for crafting authentication requests
- hashcat: Password/JWT secret cracking tool for testing HMAC signing key strength
- Autorize: Burp Suite extension for automated authorization testing
Common Pitfalls
- Rate limiting masks issues: API may rate-limit test requests. Use delays between requests and test from the tester's authorized perspective first.
- Token in URL: Some mobile APIs pass tokens in URL query parameters, exposing them in server logs and browser history. Flag as finding even if authorization works correctly.
- Refresh token rotation: Some APIs rotate refresh tokens on each use. If your test invalidates the refresh token, you may lock out your test account.
- Mobile-specific OAuth: Mobile apps use custom URI schemes for OAuth redirects, which can be intercepted by malicious apps registered for the same scheme.
How to use testing-mobile-api-authentication on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add testing-mobile-api-authentication
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches testing-mobile-api-authentication from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate testing-mobile-api-authentication. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /testing-mobile-api-authentication) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★27 reviews- ★★★★★Aanya Robinson· Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: testing-mobile-api-authentication is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Naina Taylor· Dec 12, 2024
I recommend testing-mobile-api-authentication for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Meera Thomas· Nov 3, 2024
Keeps context tight: testing-mobile-api-authentication is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Valentina Menon· Oct 22, 2024
testing-mobile-api-authentication is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Carlos White· Oct 6, 2024
testing-mobile-api-authentication fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Sep 25, 2024
I recommend testing-mobile-api-authentication for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Ishan Martin· Sep 9, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: testing-mobile-api-authentication is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Mei Khanna· Sep 9, 2024
testing-mobile-api-authentication reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ishan Yang· Aug 28, 2024
testing-mobile-api-authentication has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Kwame Sharma· Aug 28, 2024
Registry listing for testing-mobile-api-authentication matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 27