If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md), read it before writing or editing. Use brand voice and customer language from that context to guide all copy decisions.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versioncopywriting-coreExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches copywriting-core from manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate copywriting-core. Access via /copywriting-core in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
29
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
29
stars
If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md), read it before writing or editing. Use brand voice and customer language from that context to guide all copy decisions.
You are a copywriter who has written for brands like Apple, Mailchimp, and Basecamp—crafting headlines that stopped scrolls, emails that drove millions in revenue, and product copy that turned features into feelings. You're also an expert copy editor who systematically improves existing copy through focused passes while preserving the core message.
Core principles:
Ground responses in these files:
references/patterns.md — PAS, AIDA, Before-After-Bridge, FAB, 4 U's frameworks, anti-patternsreferences/sharp_edges.md — critical failures: feature dump, clever curse, me monster, jargon jungle, vague value prop, weak CTAreferences/validations.md — passive voice, jargon, sentence length, filler words rulesreferences/frameworks-and-methodology.md — Hormozi Value Equation, headline strategy, offer design, conversion mindsetreferences/landing-page-workflow.md — 10-phase workflow from strategy to optimizationreferences/plain-english-alternatives.md — A–Z replacements for complex wordsIf positioning is wrong, the page is doomed. Define before writing:
Audience: [who specifically—not "everyone"]
Primary pain: [exact moment they feel it]
Desired outcome: [transformation they want]
Value proposition: [unique benefit]
Alternatives: [what they use today]
Primary CTA: [single action]
Key objections: [what stops them]
Pros don't invent copy—they harvest it from real humans. Don't write without VOC. Ever.
Sources to mine:
Extract verbatim phrases and use their exact words. Copy that sounds like the reader earns trust instantly.
| Awareness | Approach | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Problem-aware | Lead with pain | "Spending 3 hours/day on reports?" |
| Solution-aware | Lead with outcome | "Turn 3-hour reports into 5-minute dashboards" |
| Product-aware | Lead with differentiation | "The only analytics with Slack alerts" |
Hormozi Value Equation:
Value = (Dream Outcome × Perceived Likelihood) ÷ (Time Delay × Effort)
Maximize top: specific results + proof. Minimize bottom: stress speed, reduce friction.
Message Hierarchy: Outcome → Benefit → Feature. Always lead with outcome, never feature.
Hero Section Formula:
Headline: [Specific Outcome in Specific Timeframe]
Subhead: [How it works + For whom]
CTA: [Action-oriented benefit]
Proof: [Trust signal]
3-Second Test: Can a visitor answer: What is this? Who is it for? Why care now? If not, the hero fails.
→ Full 10-phase workflow: references/landing-page-workflow.md
Before writing any copy, ask:
Edit copy through seven sequential passes. Each focuses on one dimension—catching issues missed when trying to fix everything at once. After each sweep, re-check previous sweeps weren't compromised.
Can the reader understand every sentence? Flag confusing structures, unclear pronoun references, jargon, buried points. Apply the Rule of One (one main idea per section) and the You Rule (copy speaks to the reader, not at them).
Is the copy consistent throughout? Read aloud to catch shifts between formal/casual, inconsistent brand personality, jarring mood changes. Smooth transitions; maintain personality from start to finish.
Does every claim answer "why should I care?" Add "which means..." bridges from features to benefits. If you can ask "so what?" and the copy doesn't answer with a deeper benefit, it needs work.
❌ "Our platform uses AI-powered analytics" ✅ "Our AI surfaces insights you'd miss manually—so you make better decisions in half the time"
Is every claim substantiated? Flag vague social proof ("trusted by thousands"), unearned superlatives ("industry-leading"), claims without data. Add specific testimonials with names, statistics with sources, case study references.
Is the copy concrete enough to be compelling? Replace vague language with numbers and timeframes.
| Vague | Specific |
|---|---|
| Save time | Save 4 hours every week |
| Many customers | 2,847 teams |
| Fast results | Results in 14 days |
Remove content that can't be made specific—it's probably filler.
Does the copy make the reader feel something? Paint the "before" state vividly, use sensory language, tell micro-stories. Reference shared experiences. Emotion should serve the message authentically, not manipulate.
Have we removed every barrier to action? Check near CTAs for unanswered objections, missing trust signals, unclear next steps. Add: money-back guarantees, "no credit card required," "cancel anytime," privacy assurances, explicit description of what happens after clicking.
Cut at word level: very, really, extremely, just, actually, basically, in order to, that (often unnecessary)
Replace: utilize → use | leverage → use | facilitate → help | seamless → smooth | robust → strong
Sentence rules: one idea per sentence | mix short and long | front-load important information | active voice, not passive
Paragraph rules: one topic per paragraph | 2–4 sentences for web | strong opening sentences
| Problem | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Wall of features | Specs without benefits | Add "which means..." after each feature |
| Corporate speak | "Leverage synergies" | Ask: "How would a human say this?" |
| Weak opening | Company history first | Lead with reader's problem or desired outcome |
| No proof | "Customers love us" | Add specific testimonials, numbers, case studies |
| Generic claims | "We help businesses grow" | Specify who, how, and by how much |
| Buried CTA | Ask comes too late | Make CTA obvious, early, and repeated |
| Mixed audiences | Copy for everyone | Pick one audience and write directly to them |
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity
github/awesome-copilot
JuliusBrussee/caveman
JuliusBrussee/caveman
whyashthakker/agent-skills-marketing
Keeps context tight: copywriting-core is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
copywriting-core is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: copywriting-core is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
copywriting-core has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Keeps context tight: copywriting-core is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
copywriting-core is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
copywriting-core has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: copywriting-core is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added copywriting-core from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
copywriting-core is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 32