frontend-testing

langgenius/dify · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/langgenius/dify --skill frontend-testing
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Generate Vitest and React Testing Library tests for Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities.

  • Covers component rendering, props validation, user interactions, edge cases, and async operations with Vitest 4.0.16 and React Testing Library 16.0
  • Enforces incremental, one-file-at-a-time testing workflow for multi-file directories; process by complexity (utilities → hooks → simple components → complex components → integration)
  • Requires integration-first approach: import real project
skill.md

Dify Frontend Testing Skill

This skill enables Claude to generate high-quality, comprehensive frontend tests for the Dify project following established conventions and best practices.

⚠️ Authoritative Source: This skill is derived from web/docs/test.md. Use Vitest mock/timer APIs (vi.*).

When to Apply This Skill

Apply this skill when the user:

  • Asks to write tests for a component, hook, or utility
  • Asks to review existing tests for completeness
  • Mentions Vitest, React Testing Library, RTL, or spec files
  • Requests test coverage improvement
  • Uses pnpm analyze-component output as context
  • Mentions testing, unit tests, or integration tests for frontend code
  • Wants to understand testing patterns in the Dify codebase

Do NOT apply when:

  • User is asking about backend/API tests (Python/pytest)
  • User is asking about E2E tests (Playwright/Cypress)
  • User is only asking conceptual questions without code context

Quick Reference

Tech Stack

Tool Version Purpose
Vitest 4.0.16 Test runner
React Testing Library 16.0 Component testing
jsdom - Test environment
nock 14.0 HTTP mocking
TypeScript 5.x Type safety

Key Commands

# Run all tests
pnpm test

# Watch mode
pnpm test:watch

# Run specific file
pnpm test path/to/file.spec.tsx

# Generate coverage report
pnpm test:coverage

# Analyze component complexity
pnpm analyze-component <path>

# Review existing test
pnpm analyze-component <path> --review

File Naming

  • Test files: ComponentName.spec.tsx inside a same-level __tests__/ directory
  • Placement rule: Component, hook, and utility tests must live in a sibling __tests__/ folder at the same level as the source under test. For example, foo/index.tsx maps to foo/__tests__/index.spec.tsx, and foo/bar.ts maps to foo/__tests__/bar.spec.ts.
  • Integration tests: web/__tests__/ directory

Test Structure Template

import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import Component from './index'

// ✅ Import real project components (DO NOT mock these)
// import Loading from '@/app/components/base/loading'
// import { ChildComponent } from './child-component'

// ✅ Mock external dependencies only
vi.mock('@/service/api')
vi.mock('next/navigation', () => ({
  useRouter: () => ({ push: vi.fn() }),
  usePathname: () => '/test',
}))

// ✅ Zustand stores: Use real stores (auto-mocked globally)
// Set test state with: useAppStore.setState({ ... })

// Shared state for mocks (if needed)
let mockSharedState = false

describe('ComponentName', () => {
  beforeEach(() => {
    vi.clearAllMocks()  // ✅ Reset mocks BEFORE each test
    mockSharedState = false  // ✅ Reset shared state
  })

  // Rendering tests (REQUIRED)
  describe('Rendering', () => {
    it('should render without crashing', () => {
      // Arrange
      const props = { title: 'Test' }
      
      // Act
      render(<Component {...props} />)
      
      // Assert
      expect(screen.getByText('Test')).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })

  // Props tests (REQUIRED)
  describe('Props', () => {
    it('should apply custom className', () => {
      render(<Component className="custom" />)
      expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('custom')
    })
  })

  // User Interactions
  describe('User Interactions', () => {
    it('should handle click events', () => {
      const handleClick = vi.fn()
      render(<Component onClick={handleClick} />)
      
      fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
      
      expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
    })
  })

  // Edge Cases (REQUIRED)
  describe('Edge Cases', () => {
    it('should handle null data', () => {
      render(<Component data={null} />)
      expect(screen.getByText(/no data/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
    })

    it('should handle empty array', () => {
      render(<Component items={[]} />)
      expect(screen.getByText(/empty/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })
})

Testing Workflow (CRITICAL)

⚠️ Incremental Approach Required

NEVER generate all test files at once. For complex components or multi-file directories:

  1. Analyze & Plan: List all files, order by complexity (simple → complex)
  2. Process ONE at a time: Write test → Run test → Fix if needed → Next
  3. Verify before proceeding: Do NOT continue to next file until current passes
For each file:
  ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │ 1. Write test                          │
  │ 2. Run: pnpm test <file>.spec.tsx      │
  │ 3. PASS? → Mark complete, next file    │
  │    FAIL? → Fix first, then continue    │
  └────────────────────────────────────────┘

Complexity-Based Order

Process in this order for multi-file testing:

  1. 🟢 Utility functions (simplest)
  2. 🟢 Custom hooks
  3. 🟡 Simple components (presentational)
  4. 🟡 Medium components (state, effects)
  5. 🔴 Complex components (API, routing)
  6. 🔴 Integration tests (index files - last)

When to Refactor First

  • Complexity > 50: Break into smaller pieces before testing
  • 500+ lines: Consider splitting before testing
  • Many dependencies: Extract logic into hooks first

📖 See references/workflow.md for complete workflow details and todo list format.

Testing Strategy

Path-Level Testing (Directory Testing)

When assigned to test a directory/path, test ALL content within that path:

  • Test all components, hooks, utilities in the directory (not just index file)
  • Use incremental approach: one file at a time, verify each before proceeding
  • Goal: 100% coverage of ALL files in the directory

Integration Testing First

Prefer integration testing when writing tests for a directory:

  • Import real project components directly (including base components and siblings)
  • Only mock: API services (@/service/*), next/navigation, complex context providers
  • DO NOT mock base components (@/app/components/base/*)
  • DO NOT mock sibling/child components in the same directory

See Test Structure Template for correct import/mock patterns.

nuqs Query State Testing (Required for URL State Hooks)

When a component or hook uses useQueryState / useQueryStates:

  • ✅ Use NuqsTestingAdapter (prefer shared helpers in web/test/nuqs-testing.tsx)
  • ✅ Assert URL synchronization via onUrlUpdate (searchParams, options.history)
  • ✅ For custom parsers (createParser), keep parse and serialize bijective and add roun
how to use frontend-testing

How to use frontend-testing on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add frontend-testing
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/langgenius/dify --skill frontend-testing

The skills CLI fetches frontend-testing from GitHub repository langgenius/dify and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/frontend-testing

Reload or restart Cursor to activate frontend-testing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /frontend-testing) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.635 reviews
  • Nia Lopez· Dec 24, 2024

    Registry listing for frontend-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 16, 2024

    frontend-testing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Isabella Robinson· Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in frontend-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Hana White· Nov 27, 2024

    We added frontend-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 15, 2024

    Keeps context tight: frontend-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Hiroshi Johnson· Nov 15, 2024

    frontend-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 7, 2024

    frontend-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Oct 26, 2024

    frontend-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sophia Jackson· Oct 18, 2024

    frontend-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Oct 6, 2024

    I recommend frontend-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

showing 1-10 of 35

1 / 4