tax-legal-context▌
kazukinagata/shinkoku · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
税務法的コンテキスト（Tax Legal Context）
- ›このスキルは shinkoku の税務関連回答における法的・免責コンテキストを提供する。
- ›免責事項の提示
- ›免責事項が必要な回答を行う際は、 references/disclaimer.md を読み込んで以下を実行する:
- ›references/disclaimer.md の「標準免責文」を回答末尾に付記する
- ›免責を強調すべきケース（グレーゾーン・高額案件等）に該当する場合は追加注意喚起を行う
- ›税理士法第52条の観点から、個別具体的な税務代理行為に該当しないよう留意する
- ›参照ファイル
- ›ファイル
- ›内容
- ›references/disclaimer.md
- ›標準免責文・税理士法との関係・ツール制限事項・情報の正確性
tax-legal-context
No content available.
How to use tax-legal-context on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add tax-legal-context
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches tax-legal-context from GitHub repository kazukinagata/shinkoku and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate tax-legal-context. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /tax-legal-context) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★46 reviews- ★★★★★Charlotte Torres· Dec 24, 2024
I recommend tax-legal-context for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Kiara Verma· Dec 12, 2024
tax-legal-context has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Ama Perez· Dec 8, 2024
tax-legal-context reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Fatima White· Dec 8, 2024
Useful defaults in tax-legal-context — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Kaira Jackson· Dec 4, 2024
tax-legal-context is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Malhotra· Nov 27, 2024
I recommend tax-legal-context for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Ava Jackson· Nov 15, 2024
tax-legal-context reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 7, 2024
tax-legal-context is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Olivia Jain· Nov 7, 2024
tax-legal-context is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Kaira Srinivasan· Nov 3, 2024
tax-legal-context fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 46