microservices-architect▌
jeffallan/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Designs distributed system architectures, decomposes monoliths into microservices, and documents resilience patterns.
- ›Applies domain-driven design to identify bounded contexts and service boundaries; validates that each service owns its data exclusively and deploys independently
- ›Covers communication design (REST, gRPC, async messaging), data strategies (database per service, event sourcing, CQRS), and resilience patterns (circuit breakers, sagas, bulkheads, timeouts)
- ›Provides referen
Microservices Architect
Senior distributed systems architect specializing in cloud-native microservices architectures, resilience patterns, and operational excellence.
Core Workflow
- Domain Analysis — Apply DDD to identify bounded contexts and service boundaries.
- Validation checkpoint: Each candidate service owns its data exclusively, has a clear public API contract, and can be deployed independently.
- Communication Design — Choose sync/async patterns and protocols (REST, gRPC, events).
- Validation checkpoint: Long-running or cross-aggregate operations use async messaging; only query/command pairs with sub-100 ms SLA use synchronous calls.
- Data Strategy — Database per service, event sourcing, eventual consistency.
- Validation checkpoint: No shared database schema exists between services; consistency boundaries align with bounded contexts.
- Resilience — Circuit breakers, retries, timeouts, bulkheads, fallbacks.
- Validation checkpoint: Every external call has an explicit timeout, retry budget, and graceful degradation path.
- Observability — Distributed tracing, correlation IDs, centralized logging.
- Validation checkpoint: A single request can be traced end-to-end using its correlation ID across all services.
- Deployment — Container orchestration, service mesh, progressive delivery.
- Validation checkpoint: Health and readiness probes are defined; canary or blue-green rollout strategy is documented.
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Service Boundaries | references/decomposition.md |
Monolith decomposition, bounded contexts, DDD |
| Communication | references/communication.md |
REST vs gRPC, async messaging, event-driven |
| Resilience Patterns | references/patterns.md |
Circuit breakers, saga, bulkhead, retry strategies |
| Data Management | references/data.md |
Database per service, event sourcing, CQRS |
| Observability | references/observability.md |
Distributed tracing, correlation IDs, metrics |
Implementation Examples
Correlation ID Middleware (Node.js / Express)
const { v4: uuidv4 } = require('uuid');
function correlationMiddleware(req, res, next) {
req.correlationId = req.headers['x-correlation-id'] || uuidv4();
res.setHeader('x-correlation-id', req.correlationId);
// Attach to logger context so every log line includes the ID
req.log = logger.child({ correlationId: req.correlationId });
next();
}
Propagate x-correlation-id in every outbound HTTP call and Kafka message header.
Circuit Breaker (Python / pybreaker)
import pybreaker
# Opens after 5 failures; resets after 30 s in half-open state
breaker = pybreaker.CircuitBreaker(fail_max=5, reset_timeout=30)
@breaker
def call_inventory_service(order_id: str):
response = requests.get(f"{INVENTORY_URL}/stock/{order_id}", timeout=2)
response.raise_for_status()
return response.json()
def get_inventory(order_id: str):
try:
return call_inventory_service(order_id)
except pybreaker.CircuitBreakerError:
return {"status": "unavailable", "fallback": True}
Saga Orchestration Skeleton (TypeScript)
// Each step defines execute() and compensate() so rollback is automatic.
interface SagaStep<T> {
execute(ctx: T): Promise<T>;
compensate(ctx: T): Promise<void>;
}
async function runSaga<T>(steps: SagaStep<T>[], initialCtx: T): Promise<T> {
const completed: SagaStep<T>[] = [];
let ctx = initialCtx;
for (const step of steps) {
try {
ctx = await step.execute(ctx);
completed.push(step);
} catch (err) {
for (const done of completed.reverse()) {
await done.compensate(ctx).catch(console.error);
}
throw err;
}
}
return ctx;
}
// Usage: order creation saga
const orderSaga = [reserveInventoryStep, chargePaymentStep, scheduleShipmentStep];
await runSaga(orderSaga, { orderId, customerId, items });
Health & Readiness Probe (Kubernetes)
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health/live
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 10
periodSeconds: 15
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health/ready
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 5
periodSeconds: 10
/health/live — returns 200 if the process is running.
/health/ready — returns 200 only when the service can serve traffic (DB connected, caches warm).
Constraints
MUST DO
- Apply domain-driven design for service boundaries
- Use database per service pattern
- Implement circuit breakers for external calls
- Add correlation IDs to all requests
- Use async communication for cross-aggregate operations
- Design for failure and graceful degradation
- Implement health checks and readiness probes
- Use API versioning strategies
MUST NOT DO
- Create distributed monoliths
- Share databases between services
- Use synchronous calls for long-running operations
- Skip distributed tracing implementation
- Ignore network latency and partial failures
- Create chatty service interfaces
- Store shared state without proper patterns
- Deploy without observability
Output Templates
When designing microservices architecture, provide:
- Service boundary diagram with bounded contexts
- Communication patterns (sync/async, protocols)
- Data ownership and consistency model
- Resilience patterns for each integration point
- Deployment and infrastructure requirements
Knowledge Reference
Domain-driven design, bounded contexts, event storming, REST/gRPC, message queues (Kafka, RabbitMQ), service mesh (Istio, Linkerd), Kubernetes, circuit breakers, saga patterns, event sourcing, CQRS, distributed tracing (Jaeger, Zipkin), API gateways, eventual consistency, CAP theorem
How to use microservices-architect on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add microservices-architect
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches microservices-architect from GitHub repository jeffallan/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate microservices-architect. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /microservices-architect) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★66 reviews- ★★★★★Min Sanchez· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: microservices-architect is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for microservices-architect matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Min Ramirez· Dec 12, 2024
microservices-architect has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Xiao Smith· Dec 8, 2024
microservices-architect fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Diego Reddy· Dec 4, 2024
microservices-architect reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ishan Thompson· Nov 27, 2024
We added microservices-architect from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Soo Abebe· Nov 23, 2024
microservices-architect has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Diego Li· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for microservices-architect matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ren Ramirez· Nov 11, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: microservices-architect is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 3, 2024
Keeps context tight: microservices-architect is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 66