High-level system architecture design, decision documentation, and technology trade-off evaluation for distributed systems.
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example: Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example: Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example: Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Time estimate: 15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Prerequisites
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add jeffallan/claude-skills --skill architecture-designerCompatible with
Supported agents
Guides full architecture workflows from requirements gathering through stakeholder review, with explicit trade-off analysis and failure mode planning
Produces architecture diagrams (Mermaid format), Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), and technology recommendations with documented rationale
Covers architectural patterns, microservices structuring, scalability
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionarchitecture-designerExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add jeffallan/claude-skills --skill architecture-designerFetches architecture-designer from jeffallan/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/architecture-designer
Restart Cursor to activate architecture-designer. Access via /architecture-designerin your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
django-expert
jeffallan/claude-skills · Backend · same repo
apple-hig-designer
jamesrochabrun/skills · Frontend · tag: designer
frontend-design
anthropics/claude-code · Frontend · same category
high-end-visual-design
leonxlnx/taste-skill · Frontend · same category
tui-design
hyperb1iss/hyperskills · Frontend · same category
redesign-existing-projects
leonxlnx/taste-skill · Frontend · same category
Useful defaults in architecture-designer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
I recommend architecture-designer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
I recommend architecture-designer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Useful defaults in architecture-designer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
architecture-designer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
architecture-designer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: architecture-designer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
architecture-designer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
I recommend architecture-designer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: architecture-designer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 45