unit-test-boundary-conditions

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-boundary-conditions
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Systematic JUnit 5 patterns for testing numeric limits, null/empty cases, and edge conditions.

  • Covers numeric boundaries (Integer.MIN_VALUE, MAX_VALUE, zero), string edge cases (null, empty, whitespace), and collection sizes (empty, single, many)
  • Includes parameterized test examples using @ParameterizedTest and @ValueSource for efficient multi-case coverage
  • Demonstrates floating-point precision testing with tolerance-based assertions, overflow/underflow detection, and special values
skill.md

Unit Testing Boundary Conditions and Edge Cases

Overview

Systematic patterns for testing boundary conditions, corner cases, and limit values in Java using JUnit 5. Covers numeric boundaries, string edge cases, collection states, floating-point precision, date/time limits, and off-by-one scenarios.

When to Use

  • Numeric min/max limits, null/empty/whitespace inputs
  • Overflow/underflow validation, collection boundaries
  • Off-by-one errors, floating-point precision

Instructions

  1. Identify boundaries: List numeric limits (MIN_VALUE, MAX_VALUE, zero), string states (null, empty, whitespace), collection sizes (0, 1, many)
  2. Apply parameterized tests: Use @ParameterizedTest with @ValueSource or @CsvSource for multiple boundary values
  3. Test both sides of boundaries: Cover values just below, at, and just above each boundary
  4. Run tests after adding each boundary category to catch issues early
  5. Verify floating-point precision: Use isCloseTo(expected, within(tolerance)) with AssertJ
  6. Test collection states: Explicitly test empty (0), single (1), and many (>1) element scenarios
  7. Handle overflow/underflow: Use Math.addExact() and Math.subtractExact() to detect arithmetic overflow
  8. Test date/time edges: Verify leap years, month boundaries, timezone transitions
  9. Iterate based on failures: When a boundary test fails, analyze the error to discover additional untested boundaries; add test cases for the newly discovered edge conditions

Examples

Requires: junit-jupiter, junit-jupiter-params, assertj-core.

Integer Boundary Testing

import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.ValueSource;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.*;

class IntegerBoundaryTest {

  @ParameterizedTest
  @ValueSource(ints = {Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MIN_VALUE + 1, 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1, Integer.MAX_VALUE})
  void shouldHandleIntegerBoundaries(int value) {
    assertThat(value).isNotNull();
  }

  @Test
  void shouldDetectIntegerOverflow() {
    assertThatThrownBy(() -> Math.addExact(Integer.MAX_VALUE, 1))
      .isInstanceOf(ArithmeticException.class);
  }

  @Test
  void shouldDetectIntegerUnderflow() {
    assertThatThrownBy(() -> Math.subtractExact(Integer.MIN_VALUE, 1))
      .isInstanceOf(ArithmeticException.class);
  }

  @Test
  void shouldHandleZeroEdge() {
    int result = MathUtils.divide(0, 5);
    assertThat(result).isZero();

    assertThatThrownBy(() -> MathUtils.divide(5, 0))
      .isInstanceOf(ArithmeticException.class);
  }
}

String Boundary Testing

import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.ValueSource;

class StringBoundaryTest {

  @ParameterizedTest
  @ValueSource(strings = {"", " ", "  ", "\t", "\n"})
  void shouldRejectEmptyAndWhitespace(String input) {
    boolean result = StringUtils.isNotBlank(input);
    assertThat(result).isFalse();
  }

  @Test
  void shouldHandleNullString() {
    String result = StringUtils.trim(null);
    assertThat(result).isNull();
  }

  @Test
  void shouldHandleSingleCharacter() {
    assertThat(StringUtils.capitalize("a")).isEqualTo("A");
    assertThat(StringUtils.trim("x")).isEqualTo("x");
  }

  @Test
  void shouldHandleVeryLongString() {
    String longString = "x".repeat(1000000);

    assertThat(longString.length()).isEqualTo(1000000);
    assertThat(StringUtils.isNotBlank(longString)).isTrue();
  }
}

Collection Boundary Testing

class CollectionBoundaryTest {

  @Test
  void shouldHandleEmptyList() {
    List<String> empty = List.of();

    assertThat(empty).isEmpty();
    assertThat(CollectionUtils.first(empty)).isNull();
    assertThat(CollectionUtils.count(empty)).isZero();
  }

  @Test
  void shouldHandleSingleElementList() {
    List<String> single = List.of("only");

    assertThat(single).hasSize(1);
    assertThat(CollectionUtils.first(single
how to use unit-test-boundary-conditions

How to use unit-test-boundary-conditions on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add unit-test-boundary-conditions
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-boundary-conditions

The skills CLI fetches unit-test-boundary-conditions from GitHub repository giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/unit-test-boundary-conditions

Reload or restart Cursor to activate unit-test-boundary-conditions. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /unit-test-boundary-conditions) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.757 reviews
  • Kabir Kapoor· Dec 28, 2024

    unit-test-boundary-conditions is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024

    I recommend unit-test-boundary-conditions for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Michael Desai· Dec 4, 2024

    unit-test-boundary-conditions reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Kabir Desai· Dec 4, 2024

    Useful defaults in unit-test-boundary-conditions — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Naina Farah· Nov 23, 2024

    unit-test-boundary-conditions is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Kabir Wang· Nov 23, 2024

    I recommend unit-test-boundary-conditions for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Kofi Taylor· Nov 19, 2024

    unit-test-boundary-conditions reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024

    Useful defaults in unit-test-boundary-conditions — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Kaira Abebe· Oct 14, 2024

    Useful defaults in unit-test-boundary-conditions — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Kofi Reddy· Oct 14, 2024

    unit-test-boundary-conditions reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 57

1 / 6