github-pr-merge▌
fvadicamo/dev-agent-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Merges Pull Requests after validating pre-merge checklist and handling post-merge cleanup.
GitHub PR merge
Merges Pull Requests after validating pre-merge checklist and handling post-merge cleanup.
Current PR
!gh pr view --json number,title,state -q '"PR #\(.number): \(.title) (\(.state))"' 2>/dev/null
Core workflow
1. Check comments status
Verify all review comments have at least one reply:
REPO=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q '.nameWithOwner')
PR=$(gh pr view --json number -q '.number')
# Find unreplied comment IDs
gh api repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR/comments --jq '
[.[] | select(.in_reply_to_id) | .in_reply_to_id] as $replied |
[.[] | select(.in_reply_to_id == null) | select(.id | IN($replied[]) | not) | .id]
'
If unreplied comments exist:
- STOP the merge process
- Inform user: "Found unreplied comments: [IDs]. Run github-pr-review first."
- NEVER reply to comments from this skill
2. Check milestone
gh pr view $PR --json milestone -q '.milestone.title // "none"'
- If milestone is assigned: include it in the checklist summary (step 3)
- If no milestone: check for open milestones and warn the user
gh api repos/$REPO/milestones --jq '[.[] | select(.state=="open")] | length'
If open milestones exist but the PR has none, surface a warning in the checklist:
- Milestone: ⚠ not assigned (open milestones exist)
Do NOT block the merge for a missing milestone. It is a warning only.
3. Run validation
Run tests, linting, and verify CI checks. All MUST pass before proceeding.
gh pr checks $PR
4. Confirm with user
ALWAYS show checklist summary and ask before merging:
Pre-merge checklist:
- Comments: all replied
- Tests: passing
- Lint: passing
- CI: green
- Milestone: v0.1.0 (or ⚠ not assigned)
Ready to merge PR #X. Proceed?
5. Execute merge
gh pr merge $PR --merge --delete-branch --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
- Key change 1
- Key change 2
- Key change 3
Reviews: N/N addressed
Tests: X passed (Y% cov)
Refs: Task N, Req M
EOF
)"
Merge strategy: always --merge (merge commit), never squash or rebase.
--delete-branch automatically deletes the remote branch after merge.
6. Post-merge cleanup
git checkout develop && git pull origin develop
7. Check milestone completion
If the PR had a milestone, check whether all items are now closed:
MILESTONE=$(gh pr view $PR --json milestone -q '.milestone.number // empty')
if [ -n "$MILESTONE" ]; then
gh api repos/$REPO/milestones/$MILESTONE \
--jq '"Open: \(.open_issues) | Closed: \(.closed_issues) | \(.title)"'
fi
- If
open_issues == 0: inform the user and ask whether to close the milestone
gh api repos/$REPO/milestones/$MILESTONE --method PATCH --field state="closed"
- If
open_issues > 0: report remaining open items count. No action needed. - NEVER close a milestone automatically without explicit user confirmation.
Merge message format
Concise format for a clean git log:
- Key change 1 (what was added/fixed)
- Key change 2
- Key change 3
Reviews: 7/7 addressed (Gemini 5, Codex 2)
Tests: 628 passed (88% cov)
Refs: Task 8, Req 14-15
- 3-5 bullet points max for changes
- One line each for reviews summary, test results, and task references
- No headers (##), no verbose sections
- Total: ~10 lines max
Important rules
- ALWAYS run tests, lint, and CI checks before merging
- ALWAYS verify all review comments have replies
- ALWAYS check milestone assignment before merging (warn if missing, do not block)
- ALWAYS confirm with user before executing merge
- ALWAYS use merge commit (
--merge), never squash/rebase - ALWAYS delete feature branch after successful merge
- ALWAYS check milestone completion after merge and report open items count
- NEVER merge with failing tests, lint, or CI checks
- NEVER skip user confirmation
- NEVER close a milestone without explicit user confirmation
- NEVER reply to PR comments from this skill - use github-pr-review instead
- STOP merge if unreplied comments exist and direct user to review skill
How to use github-pr-merge on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add github-pr-merge
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches github-pr-merge from GitHub repository fvadicamo/dev-agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate github-pr-merge. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /github-pr-merge) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★72 reviews- ★★★★★Soo Liu· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: github-pr-merge is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Soo Thompson· Dec 24, 2024
github-pr-merge reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Kabir Bansal· Dec 20, 2024
github-pr-merge reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ishan Diallo· Dec 16, 2024
github-pr-merge has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 12, 2024
github-pr-merge reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ishan Nasser· Dec 12, 2024
I recommend github-pr-merge for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Isabella Jackson· Dec 8, 2024
Registry listing for github-pr-merge matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kwame Park· Dec 4, 2024
github-pr-merge is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Ishan Abebe· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in github-pr-merge — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Soo Lopez· Nov 19, 2024
I recommend github-pr-merge for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 72