swiftui-code-review

existential-birds/beagle · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle --skill swiftui-code-review
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

swiftui-code-review

skill.md

SwiftUI Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue Type Reference
View extraction, modifiers, body complexity references/view-composition.md
@State, @Binding, @Observable, @Bindable references/state-management.md
LazyStacks, AnyView, ForEach, identity references/performance.md
VoiceOver, Dynamic Type, labels, traits references/accessibility.md

Review Checklist

  • View body under 10 composed elements (extract subviews)
  • Modifiers in correct order (padding before background)
  • @StateObject for view-owned objects, @ObservedObject for passed objects
  • @Bindable used for two-way bindings to @Observable (iOS 17+)
  • LazyVStack/LazyHStack for scrolling lists with 50+ items
  • No AnyView (use @ViewBuilder or generics instead)
  • ForEach uses stable Identifiable IDs (not array indices)
  • All images/icons have accessibilityLabel
  • Custom controls have accessibilityAddTraits(.isButton)
  • Dynamic Type supported (no fixed font sizes)
  • .task modifier for async work (not onAppear + Task)

When to Load References

  • Complex view bodies or modifier chains -> view-composition.md
  • Property wrapper usage (@State, @Observable) -> state-management.md
  • List performance or view identity issues -> performance.md
  • VoiceOver or accessibility implementation -> accessibility.md

Review Questions

  1. Could this large view body be split into smaller, reusable Views?
  2. Is modifier order intentional? (padding -> background -> frame)
  3. Is @StateObject/@ObservedObject usage correct for ownership?
  4. Could LazyVStack improve this ScrollView's performance?
  5. Would VoiceOver users understand this interface?
how to use swiftui-code-review

How to use swiftui-code-review on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add swiftui-code-review
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle --skill swiftui-code-review

The skills CLI fetches swiftui-code-review from GitHub repository existential-birds/beagle and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/swiftui-code-review

Reload or restart Cursor to activate swiftui-code-review. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /swiftui-code-review) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.650 reviews
  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 24, 2024

    We added swiftui-code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Evelyn Tandon· Dec 24, 2024

    swiftui-code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 20, 2024

    I recommend swiftui-code-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Yusuf Choi· Dec 20, 2024

    swiftui-code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Naina Park· Dec 16, 2024

    Useful defaults in swiftui-code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 15, 2024

    swiftui-code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Evelyn Patel· Nov 15, 2024

    We added swiftui-code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Neel Chen· Nov 15, 2024

    swiftui-code-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Kofi Choi· Nov 11, 2024

    Keeps context tight: swiftui-code-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Aisha Brown· Nov 7, 2024

    swiftui-code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 50

1 / 5