Answer user questions about monitoring LLMs and agentic components using data ingested into Elastic only. Focus on
Works with
LLM performance, cost and token utilization, response quality, and call chaining or agentic workflow orchestration. Use
ES|QL, Elasticsearch APIs, and (where needed) Kibana APIs. Do not rely on Kibana UI; the skill works without it. A
given deployment typically uses one or more ingestion paths (APM/OTLP traces and/or integration metrics/logs)—
discover what is available before query
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionobservability-llm-obsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches observability-llm-obs from elastic/agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate observability-llm-obs. Access via /observability-llm-obs in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
296
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
296
stars
Answer user questions about monitoring LLMs and agentic components using data ingested into Elastic only. Focus on LLM performance, cost and token utilization, response quality, and call chaining or agentic workflow orchestration. Use ES|QL, Elasticsearch APIs, and (where needed) Kibana APIs. Do not rely on Kibana UI; the skill works without it. A given deployment typically uses one or more ingestion paths (APM/OTLP traces and/or integration metrics/logs)— discover what is available before querying.
traces* when collected by the
Elastic APM Agent, and in traces-generic.otel-default (and similar) when collected by OpenTelemetry. Use the
generic pattern traces* to find all trace data regardless of source. When the application is instrumented with
OpenTelemetry (e.g. Elastic
Distributions of OpenTelemetry (EDOT),
OpenLLMetry, OpenLIT, Langtrace exporting to OTLP), LLM and agent spans land in these trace data streams; metrics may
land in metrics-apm* or metrics-generic. Query traces* and metrics* data streams for per-request and
aggregated LLM signals.metrics*, logs* with dataset/namespace per integration). Check which data
streams exist.GET _data_stream, or
GET traces*/_mapping, GET metrics*/_mapping) and optionally sample a document to see which LLM-related fields are
present. Do not assume both APM and integration data exist.traces* or metrics data streams.traces*, or integration metrics). Firing alerts or
violated/degrading SLOs point to potential degraded performance.Spans from OTel/EDOT (and compatible SDKs) carry span attributes that may follow
OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions or
provider-specific names. In Elasticsearch, attributes typically appear under span.attributes (exact key names depend
on ingestion). Common attributes:
| Purpose | Example attribute names (OTel GenAI) |
|---|---|
| Operation / provider | gen_ai.operation.name, gen_ai.provider.name |
| Model | gen_ai.request.model, gen_ai.response.model |
| Token usage | gen_ai.usage.input_tokens, gen_ai.usage.output_tokens |
| Request config | gen_ai.request.temperature, gen_ai.request.max_tokens |
| Errors | error.type |
| Conversation / agent | gen_ai.conversation.id; tool/agent spans as child spans |
Cost is not in the OTel spec; some instrumentations add custom attributes (e.g. llm.response.cost.usd_estimate).
Discover actual field names from the index mapping or a sample document (e.g. span.attributes.* or flattened keys).
Use duration and event.outcome on spans for latency and success/failure. Use trace.id, span.id, and parent/child span relationships to analyze call chaining and agentic workflows (e.g. one root span, multiple LLM or tool-call child spans).
Integrations (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Azure AI Foundry, Bedrock, Bedrock AgentCore, Vertex AI, etc.) ship metrics (and where supported logs) to Elastic. Metrics typically include token usage, request counts, latency, and—where the integration supports it—cost-related fields. Logs may include prompt/response or guardrail events. Exact field names and data streams are defined by each integration package; discover them from the integration docs or from the target data stream mapping.
GET _data_stream and filter for traces*, metrics-apm* (or metrics*), and metrics-* /
logs-* that match known LLM integration datasets (e.g. from
Elastic LLM observability).traces*, run a small search or use mapping to see if spans contain gen_ai.* or
llm.* (or similar) attributes. Confirm presence of token, model, and duration fields.traces* filtered by span attributes (e.g. gen_ai.operation.name or gen_ai.provider.name
when present). Compute throughput (count per time bucket), latency (e.g. duration.us or span duration), and error
rate (event.outcome == "failure") by model, service, or time.traces*: sum gen_ai.usage.input_tokens and gen_ai.usage.output_tokens (or
equivalent attribute names) by time, model, or service. If a cost attribute exists (e.g. custom
llm.response.cost.*), sum it for cost views.event.outcome, error.type, and span attributes (e.g. gen_ai.response.finish_reasons) in
traces* to identify failures, timeouts, or content filters. Correlate with prompts/responses if captured in
attributes (e.g. gen_ai.input.messages, gen_ai.output.messages) and not redacted.traces*. Filter by root service or trace attributes; group by trace.id
and use parent/child span relationships (e.g. parent.id, span.id) to reconstruct chains (e.g. orchestration span →
multiple LLM or tool-call spans). Aggregate by span name or gen_ai.operation.name to see distribution of steps (e.g.
retrieval, LLM, tool use). Duration per span and per trace gives bottleneck and end-to-end latency.@timestamp). When present, add service.name and optionally
service.environment. For LLM-specific spans, filter by span attributes once you know the field names (e.g. a keyword
field for gen_ai.provider.name or gen_ai.operation.name).LIMIT, coarse time buckets when only trends are needed, and avoid full scans over large
windows.LLM observability progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Determine available data (traces*, metrics-apm* or metrics*, or integration data streams)
- [ ] Step 2: Discover LLM-related field names (mapping or sample doc)
- [ ] Step 3: Run ES|QL or Elasticsearch queries for the user's question (performance, cost, quality, orchestration)
- [ ] Step 4: Check for active alerts or SLOs defined on LLM-related data (Alerting API, SLOs API); field names from
Step 2 help identify related rules; firing alerts or violated/degrading SLOs indicate potential degraded performance
- [ ] Step 5: Summarize findings from ingested data only; include alert/SLO status when relevant
Assume span attributes are available as span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.input_tokens and
span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.output_tokens (adjust to actual field names from mapping):
FROM traces*
| WHERE @timestamp >= "2025-03-01T00:00:00Z" AND @timestamp <= "2025-03-01T23:59:59Z"
AND span.attributes.gen_ai.provider.name IS NOT NULL
| STATS
input_tokens = SUM(span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.input_tokens),
output_tokens = SUM(span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.output_tokens)
BY BUCKET(@timestamp, 1 hour), span.attributes.gen_ai.request.model
| SORT @timestamp
| LIMIT 500
FROM traces*
| WHERE @timestamp >= "2025-03-01T00:00:00Z" AND @timestamp <= "2025-03-01T23:59:59Z"
AND span.attributes.gen_ai.request.model IS NOT NULL
| STATS
request_count = COUNT(*),
failures = COUNT(*) WHERE event.outcome == "failure",
avg_duration_us = AVG(span.duration.us)
BY span.attributes.gen_ai.request.model
| EVAL error_rate = failures / request_count
| LIMIT 100
Get trace IDs that contain at least one LLM span and count spans per trace to see chain length:
FROM traces*
| WHERE @timestamp >= "2025-03-01T00:00:00Z" AND @timestamp <= "2025-03-01T23:59:59Z"
AND span.attributes.gen_ai.operation.name IS NOT NULL
| STATS span_count = COUNT(*), total_duration_us = SUM(span.duration.us) BY trace.id
| WHERE span_count > 1
| SORT total_duration_us DESC
| LIMIT 50
The Amazon Bedrock AgentCore integration
ships metrics to the metrics-aws_bedrock_agentcore.metrics-* data stream (time series index). Use TS for
aggregations on time series data streams (Elasticsearch 9.2+); use a time range with TRANGE (9.3+). The
integration’s dashboards and
alerting rule templates
Example: token usage (counter), invocations (counter), and average latency (gauge) by hour and agent:
TS metrics-aws_bedrock_agentcore.metrics-*
| WHERE TRANGE(7 days)
AND aws.dimensions.Operation == "InvokeAgentRuntime"
| STATS
total_tokens = SUM(RATE(aws.bedrock_agentcore.metrics.TokenCount.sum)),
total_invocations = SUM(RATE(aws.bedrock_agentcore.metrics.Invocations.sum)),
avg_latency_ms = AVG(AVG_OVER_TIME(aws.bedrock_agentcore.metrics.Latency.avg))
BY TBUCKET(1 hour), aws.bedrock_agentcore.agent_name
| SORT TBUCKET(1 hour) DESC
For Elasticsearch 8.x or when TS is not available, use FROM with BUCKET(@timestamp, 1 hour) and SUM/AVG over
the metric fields (as in the integration's alert rule templates). For other LLM integrations (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI,
Vertex AI, etc.), use that integration’s data stream index pattern and field names from its package (see
Elastic LLM observability).
traces*, metrics, or integration
metrics/logs). Do not describe or rely on other vendors’ UIs or products._mapping or a sample document; naming may differ (e.g. gen_ai.* vs llm.* or integration-specific fields).Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
am-will/codex-skills
davila7/claude-code-templates
intellectronica/agent-skills
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
myzy-ai/dokie-ai-ppt
shadowcz007/skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: observability-llm-obs is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
observability-llm-obs has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
observability-llm-obs reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Keeps context tight: observability-llm-obs is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
observability-llm-obs fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
observability-llm-obs has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
observability-llm-obs is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: observability-llm-obs is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added observability-llm-obs from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
We added observability-llm-obs from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 69