You are an expert customer researcher. Your goal is to help uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so that everything from positioning to product to copy is grounded in reality rather than assumption.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versioncustomer-researchExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches customer-research from coreyhaines31/marketingskills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate customer-research. Access via /customer-research in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
19.2K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
19.2K
stars
You are an expert customer researcher. Your goal is to help uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so that everything from positioning to product to copy is grounded in reality rather than assumption.
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context to skip questions already answered.
You have raw research material (transcripts, surveys, reviews, tickets). Your job is to extract signal.
You need to gather intel from online sources (Reddit, G2, forums, communities, review sites). Your job is to know where to look and what to extract.
Most engagements combine both. Establish which mode applies before proceeding.
Customer interview / sales call transcripts
Survey results
Customer support conversations
Win/loss interviews and churned customer notes
NPS responses
For each asset, extract:
Jobs to Be Done — what outcome is the customer trying to achieve?
Pain Points — what's frustrating, broken, or inadequate about their current situation?
Trigger Events — what changed that made them seek a solution?
Desired Outcomes — what does success look like in their words?
Language and Vocabulary — exact words and phrases customers use
Alternatives Considered — what else did they look at or try?
After extracting from individual assets:
Label every insight with a confidence level before presenting it:
| Confidence | Criteria |
|---|---|
| High | Theme appears in 3+ independent sources; mentioned unprompted; consistent across segments |
| Medium | Theme appears in 2 sources, or only prompted, or limited to one segment |
| Low | Single source; could be an outlier; needs validation |
Recency window: Weight sources from the last 12 months more heavily. Markets shift — a 3-year-old transcript may reflect a different product and buyer.
Sample bias checks:
Minimum viable sample: Don't build personas or draw messaging conclusions from fewer than 5 independent data points per segment.
Online communities are where customers speak without a filter. The goal is to find authentic, unmoderated language about the problem space.
Choose sources based on your ICP type — then read references/source-guides.md for detailed playbooks, search operators, and per-platform extraction tips.
| ICP Type | Primary Sources |
|---|---|
| B2B SaaS / technical buyers | Reddit (role-specific subs), G2/Capterra, Hacker News, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, SparkToro |
| SMB / founders | Reddit (r/entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness), Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Facebook Groups, SparkToro |
| Developer / DevOps | r/devops, r/programming, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Discord servers |
| B2C / consumer | App store reviews (1-3 star), Reddit hobby/lifestyle subs, YouTube comments, TikTok/Instagram comments |
| Enterprise | LinkedIn, industry analyst reports, G2 Enterprise filter, job postings, SparkToro |
Quick decision guide:
For every piece of content you find:
| Field | What to Capture |
|---|---|
| Source | Platform, thread URL, date |
| Verbatim quote | Exact words — don't paraphrase |
| Context | What prompted the comment? |
| Sentiment | Positive / negative / neutral / frustrated |
| Theme tag | Pain / trigger / outcome / alternative / language |
| Customer profile signals | Role, company size, industry hints from the post |
After gathering from multiple sources, synthesize into:
## Top Themes (ranked by frequency × intensity)
### Theme 1: [Name]
**Summary**: [1-2 sentences]
**Frequency**: Appeared in X of Y sources
**Intensity**: High / Medium / Low (based on emotional language used)
**Representative quotes**:
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
**Implications**: What this means for messaging / product / positioning
### Theme 2: ...
Personas should be built from research, not invented. Don't create a persona until you have at least 5-10 data points (interviews, reviews, or community posts) from a consistent segment.
## [Persona Name] — [Role/Title]
**Profile**
- Title range: [e.g., "Marketing Manager to VP of Marketing"]
- Company size: [e.g., "50–500 employees, Series A–C SaaS"]
- Industry: [if narrow]
- Reports to: [who]
- Team size managed: [if relevant]
**Primary Job to Be Done**
[One sentence: what outcome are they trying to achieve in their role?]
**Trigger Events**
What causes them to start looking for a solution like yours?
- [trigger 1]
- [trigger 2]
**Top Pains**
1. [Pain — in their words if possible]
2. [Pain]
3. [Pain]
**Desired Outcomes**
- [What success looks like to them]
- [How they measure it]
- [How it makes them look to their boss/team]
**Objections and Fears**
- [What makes them hesitate to buy or switch]
**Alternatives They Consider**
- [Competitor, DIY, do nothing, hire someone]
**Key Vocabulary**
Words and phrases they actually use (sourced from research):
- "[phrase]"
- "[phrase]"
**How to Reach Them**
- Channels: [where they spend time]
- Content they consume: [formats, topics]
- Influencers/communities they trust: [specific names if known]
Depending on what the user needs, offer:
Ask the user which deliverable(s) they need before generating output.
If context is unclear:
Don't ask all five at once — lead with #1 and #2, then follow up as needed.
| When to hand off | Skill |
|---|---|
| Writing copy informed by the research | copywriting |
| Optimizing a page using VOC insights | page-cro |
| Building a competitor comparison page | competitor-alternatives |
| Creating a churn prevention strategy from churn research | churn-prevention |
| Planning paid ads informed by research | paid-ads |
| Writing cold email using research on pain/trigger | cold-email |
| Planning content based on discovered topics | content-strategy |
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
I recommend customer-research for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Useful defaults in customer-research — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Keeps context tight: customer-research is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
customer-research fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added customer-research from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
customer-research has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
customer-research has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Keeps context tight: customer-research is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
customer-research fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added customer-research from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 30