axiom-ui-testing▌
charleswiltgen/axiom · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Wait for conditions, not arbitrary timeouts. Core principle Flaky tests come from guessing how long operations take. Condition-based waiting eliminates race conditions.
UI Testing
Overview
Wait for conditions, not arbitrary timeouts. Core principle Flaky tests come from guessing how long operations take. Condition-based waiting eliminates race conditions.
NEW in WWDC 2025: Recording UI Automation allows you to record interactions, replay across devices/languages, and review video recordings of test runs.
Example Prompts
These are real questions developers ask that this skill is designed to answer:
1. "My UI tests pass locally on my Mac but fail in CI. How do I make them more reliable?"
→ The skill shows condition-based waiting patterns that work across devices/speeds, eliminating CI timing differences
2. "My tests use sleep(2) and sleep(5) but they're still flaky. How do I replace arbitrary timeouts with real conditions?"
→ The skill demonstrates waitForExistence, XCTestExpectation, and polling patterns for data loads, network requests, and animations
3. "I just recorded a test using Xcode 26's Recording UI Automation. How do I review the video and debug failures?"
→ The skill covers Video Debugging workflows to analyze recordings and find the exact step where tests fail
4. "My test is failing on iPad but passing on iPhone. How do I write tests that work across all device sizes?"
→ The skill explains multi-factor testing strategies and device-independent predicates for robust cross-device testing
5. "I want to write tests that are not flaky. What are the critical patterns I need to know?"
→ The skill provides condition-based waiting templates, accessibility-first patterns, and the decision tree for reliable test architecture
Red Flags — Test Reliability Issues
If you see ANY of these, suspect timing issues:
- Tests pass locally, fail in CI (timing differences)
- Tests sometimes pass, sometimes fail (race conditions)
- Tests use
sleep()orThread.sleep()(arbitrary delays) - Tests fail with "UI element not found" then pass on retry
- Long test runs (waiting for worst-case scenarios)
Quick Decision Tree
Test failing?
├─ Element not found?
│ └─ Use waitForExistence(timeout:) not sleep()
├─ Passes locally, fails CI?
│ └─ Replace sleep() with condition polling
├─ Animation causing issues?
│ └─ Wait for animation completion, don't disable
└─ Network request timing?
└─ Use XCTestExpectation or waitForExistence
Core Pattern: Condition-Based Waiting
❌ WRONG (Arbitrary Timeout):
func testButtonAppears() {
app.buttons["Login"].tap()
sleep(2) // ❌ Guessing it takes 2 seconds
XCTAssertTrue(app.buttons["Dashboard"].exists)
}
✅ CORRECT (Wait for Condition):
func testButtonAppears() {
app.buttons["Login"].tap()
let dashboard = app.buttons["Dashboard"]
XCTAssertTrue(dashboard.waitForExistence(timeout: 5))
}
Common UI Testing Patterns
Pattern 1: Waiting for Elements
// Wait for element to appear
func waitForElement(_ element: XCUIElement, timeout: TimeInterval = 5) -> Bool {
return element.waitForExistence(timeout: timeout)
}
// Usage
XCTAssertTrue(waitForElement(app.buttons["Submit"]))
Pattern 2: Waiting for Element to Disappear
func waitForElementToDisappear(_ element: XCUIElement, timeout: TimeInterval = 5) -> Bool {
let predicate = NSPredicate(format: "exists == false")
let expectation = XCTNSPredicateExpectation(predicate: predicate, object: element)
let result = XCTWaiter().wait(for: [expectation], timeout: timeout)
return result == .completed
}
// Usage
XCTAssertTrue(waitForElementToDisappear(app.activityIndicators["Loading"]))
Pattern 3: Waiting for Specific State
func waitForButton(_ button: XCUIElement, toBeEnabled enabled: Bool, timeout: TimeInterval = 5) -> Bool {
let predicate = NSPredicate(format: "isEnabled == %@", NSNumber(value: enabled))
let expectation = XCTNSPredicateExpectation(predicate: predicate, object: button)
let result = XCTWaiter().wait(for: [expectation], timeout: timeout)
return result == .completed
}
// Usage
let submitButton = app.buttons["Submit"]
XCTAssertTrue(waitForButton(submitButton, toBeEnabled: true))
submitButton.tap()
Pattern 4: Accessibility Identifiers
Set in app:
Button("Submit") {
// action
}
.accessibilityIdentifier("submitButton")
Use in tests:
func testSubmitButton() {
let submitButton = app.buttons["submitButton"] // Uses identifier, not label
XCTAssertTrue(submitButton.waitForExistence(timeout: 5))
submitButton.tap()
}
Why: Accessibility identifiers don't change with localization, remain stable across UI updates.
Pattern 5: Network Request Delays
func testDataLoads() {
app.buttons["Refresh"].tap()
// Wait for loading indicator to disappear
let loadingIndicator = app.activityIndicators["Loading"]
XCTAssertTrue(waitForElementToDisappear(loadingIndicator, timeout: 10))
// Now verify data loaded
XCTAssertTrue(app.cells.count > 0)
}
Pattern 6: Animation Handling
func testAnimatedTransition() {
app.buttons["Next"].tap()
// Wait for destination view to appear
let destinationView = app.otherElements["DestinationView"]
XCTAssertTrue(destinationView.waitForExistence(timeout: 2))
// Optional: Wait a bit more for animation to settle
// Only if absolutely necessary
RunLoop.current.run(until: Date(timeIntervalSinceNow: 0.3))
}
Testing Checklist
Before Writing Tests
- Use accessibility identifiers for all interactive elements
- Avoid hardcoded labels (use identifiers instead)
- Plan for network delays and animations
- Choose appropriate timeouts (2s UI, 10s network)
When Writing Tests
- Use
waitForExistence()notsleep() - Use predicates for complex conditions
- Test both success and failure paths
- Make tests independent (can run in any order)
After Writing Tests
- Run tests 10
How to use axiom-ui-testing on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add axiom-ui-testing
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches axiom-ui-testing from GitHub repository charleswiltgen/axiom and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate axiom-ui-testing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /axiom-ui-testing) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★45 reviews- ★★★★★Sophia Martinez· Dec 24, 2024
axiom-ui-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-ui-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Xiao Martinez· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for axiom-ui-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Xiao Desai· Dec 12, 2024
I recommend axiom-ui-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Noor Sanchez· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: axiom-ui-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Hassan Ndlovu· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend axiom-ui-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 11, 2024
We added axiom-ui-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Xiao Ghosh· Nov 3, 2024
Useful defaults in axiom-ui-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★William Chawla· Nov 3, 2024
axiom-ui-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Flores· Oct 22, 2024
I recommend axiom-ui-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 45