consulting-analysis▌
bytedance/deer-flow · updated Jun 2, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Consulting-grade research reports across market analysis, financial analysis, competitive intelligence, and strategic planning.
- ›Operates in two phases: Phase 1 generates a structured analysis framework with chapter skeleton, data requirements, and visualization plans; Phase 2 synthesizes collected data into a polished final report
- ›Selects from 20+ professional frameworks (SWOT, Porter's Five Forces, TAM-SAM-SOM, Consumer Decision Journey, DuPont Analysis, Blue Ocean Strategy, etc.) matc
Professional Research Report Skill
Overview
This skill produces professional, consulting-grade research reports in Markdown format, covering domains such as market analysis, consumer insights, brand strategy, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment research, and macroeconomic analysis. It operates across two distinct phases:
- Phase 1 — Analysis Framework Generation: Given a research subject, produce a rigorous analysis framework including chapter skeleton, per-chapter data requirements, analysis logic, and visualization plan.
- Phase 2 — Report Generation: After data has been collected by other skills, synthesize all inputs into a final polished report.
The output adheres to McKinsey/BCG consulting voice standards. The report language follows the output_locale setting (default: zh_CN for Chinese).
Data Authenticity Protocol
Strict Adherence Rule: All data presented in the report and visualized in charts MUST be derived directly from the provided Data Summary or External Search Findings.
- NO Hallucinations: Do not invent, estimate, or simulate data. If data is missing, state "Data not available" rather than fabricating numbers.
- Traceable Sources: Every major claim and chart must be traceable back to the input data package.
Core Capabilities
- Design analysis frameworks from scratch given only a research subject and scope
- Transform raw data into structured, high-depth research reports
- Follow the "Visual Anchor → Data Contrast → Integrated Analysis" flow per sub-chapter
- Produce insights following the "Data → User Psychology → Strategy Implication" chain
- Embed pre-generated charts and construct comparison tables
- Generate inline citations formatted per GB/T 7714-2015 standards
- Output reports in the language specified by
output_localewith professional consulting tone - Adapt analytical depth and structure to domain (marketing, finance, industry, etc.)
When to Use This Skill
Always load this skill when:
- User asks for a market analysis, consumer insight report, financial analysis, industry research, or any consulting-grade analytical report
- User provides a research subject and needs a structured analysis framework before data collection
- User provides data summaries, analysis frameworks, or chart files to be synthesized into a report
- User needs a professional consulting-style research report
- The task involves transforming research findings into structured strategic narratives
Phase 1: Analysis Framework Generation
Purpose
Given a research subject (e.g., "Gen-Z Skincare Market Analysis", "NEV Industry Competitive Landscape", "Brand X Consumer Profiling"), produce a complete analysis framework that serves as the blueprint for downstream data collection and final report generation.
Phase 1 Inputs
| Input | Description | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Research Subject | The topic or question to be analyzed | Yes |
| Scope / Constraints | Geographic scope, time range, industry segment, target audience, etc. | Optional |
| Specific Angles | Any particular angles or hypotheses the user wants explored | Optional |
| Domain | The analytical domain: market, finance, industry, brand, consumer, investment, etc. | Inferred |
Phase 1 Workflow
Step 1.1: Understand the Research Subject
- Parse the research subject to identify the core entity (market, brand, product, industry, consumer segment, financial instrument, etc.)
- Identify the analytical domain (marketing, finance, industry, competitive, consumer, investment, macro, etc.)
- Determine the natural analytical dimensions based on domain:
| Domain | Typical Dimensions |
|---|---|
| Market Analysis | Market size, growth trends, market segmentation, growth drivers, competitive landscape, consumer profiling |
| Brand Analysis | Brand positioning, market share, consumer perception, marketing strategy, competitor comparison |
| Consumer Insights | Demographic profiling, purchase behavior, decision journey, pain points, scenario analysis |
| Financial Analysis | Macro environment, industry trends, company fundamentals, financial metrics, valuation, risk assessment |
| Industry Research | Value chain analysis, market size, competitive landscape, policy environment, technology trends, entry barriers |
| Investment Due Diligence | Business model, financial health, management assessment, market opportunity, risk factors, exit pathways |
| Competitive Intelligence | Competitor identification, strategic comparison, SWOT analysis, differentiated positioning, market dynamics |
Step 1.2: Select Analysis Frameworks & Models
Based on the identified domain and research subject, select one or more professional analysis frameworks to structure the reasoning in each chapter. The chosen frameworks guide the Analysis Logic in the chapter skeleton (Step 1.3).
Strategic & Environmental Analysis
| Framework | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| SWOT Analysis | Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats | Brand assessment, competitive positioning, strategic planning |
| PEST / PESTEL Analysis | Political, Economic, Social, Technological (+ Environmental, Legal) | Macro-environment scanning, market entry assessment, policy impact analysis |
| Porter's Five Forces | Supplier bargaining power, buyer bargaining power, threat of new entrants, threat of substitutes, industry rivalry | Industry competitive landscape, entry barrier assessment, profit margin analysis |
| Porter's Diamond Model | Factor conditions, demand conditions, related industries, firm strategy & structure | National/regional competitive advantage analysis |
| VRIO Analysis | Value, Rarity, Imitability, Organization | Core competency assessment, resource advantage analysis |
Market & Growth Analysis
| Framework | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| STP Analysis | Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning | Market segmentation, target market selection, brand positioning |
| BCG Matrix (Growth-Share Matrix) | Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, Dogs | Product portfolio management, resource allocation decisions |
| Ansoff Matrix | Market penetration, market development, product development, diversification | Growth strategy selection |
| Product Life Cycle (PLC) | Introduction, growth, maturity, decline | Product strategy formulation, market timing decisions |
| TAM-SAM-SOM | Total / Serviceable / Obtainable Market | Market sizing, opportunity quantification |
| Technology Adoption Lifecycle | Innovators → Early Adopters → Early Majority → Late Majority → Laggards | Emerging technology/category penetration analysis |
Consumer & Behavioral Analysis
| Framework | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Decision Journey | Awareness → Consideration → Evaluation → Purchase → Loyalty | Consumer behavior path mapping, touchpoint optimization |
| AARRR Funnel (Pirate Metrics) | Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Revenue, Referral | User growth analysis, conversion rate optimization |
| RFM Model | Recency, Frequency, Monetary | Customer value segmentation, precision marketing |
| Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs | Physiological → Safety → Social → Esteem → Self-actualization | Consumer psychology analysis, product value proposition |
| Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD) | The "job" a user needs to accomplish in a specific context | Demand insight, product innovation direction |
Financial & Valuation Analysis
| Framework | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| DuPont Analysis | ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier | Profitability decomposition, financial health diagnosis |
| DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) | Free cash flow discounting | Enterprise/project valuation |
| Comparable Company Analysis | PE, PB, PS, EV/EBITDA multiples comparison | Relative valuation, peer benchmarking |
| EVA (Economic Value Added) | After-tax operating profit - Cost of capital | Value creation capability assessment |
Competitive & Strategic Positioning
| Framework | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarking | Key performance indicator item-by-item comparison | Competitor gap analysis, best practice identification |
| Strategic Group Mapping | Cluster competitors along two key dimensions | Competitive landscape visualization, white-space identification |
| Value Chain Analysis | Primary activities + support activities value decomposition | Cost advantage sources, differentiation opportunity identification |
| Blue Ocean Strategy | Value curve, four-action framework (Eliminate-Reduce-Raise-Create) | Differentiated innovation, new market space creation |
| Perceptual Mapping | Plot brand positions along two consumer-perceived dimensions | Brand positioning analysis, market gap discovery |
Industry & Supply Chain Analysis
| Framework | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Industry Value Chain | Upstream → Midstream → Downstream decomposition | Industry structure understanding, profit distribution analysis |
| Gartner Hype Cycle | Technology Trigger → Peak of Inflated Expectations → Trough of Disillusionment → Slope of Enlightenment → Plateau of Productivity | Emerging technology maturity assessment |
| GE-McKinsey Matrix | Industry Attractiveness × Competitive Strength | Business portfolio prioritization, investment decisions |
Selection Principles
- Domain-First: Based on the domain identified in Step 1.1, select 2-4 most relevant frameworks from the toolkit above
- Complementary: Choose complementary rather than overlapping frameworks (e.g., macro-level with PESTEL + micro-level with Porter's Five Forces)
- Depth over Breadth: Better to deeply apply 2 frameworks than superficially stack 6
- Data-Feasible: Selected frameworks must be supportable by downstream data collection skills — if the data required by a framework cannot be reasonably obtained, downgrade or substitute
- Explicit Mapping: In the chapter skeleton, explicitly annotate which framework each chapter uses and how it is applied
Framework Selection Output Format
## Framework Selection
| Chapter | Selected Framework(s) | Application |
|---------|----------------------|-------------|
| Market Size & Growth Trends | TAM-SAM-SOM + Product Life Cycle | TAM-SAM-SOM to quantify market space, PLC to determine market stage |
| Competitive Landscape Assessment | Porter's Five Forces + Strategic Group Mapping | Five Forces to assess industry competition intensity, Group Mapping to visualize competitive positioning |
| Consumer Profiling | RFM + Consumer Decision Journey | RFM to segment customer value, Decision Journey to identify key conversion nodes |
| Brand Strategy Recommendations | SWOT + Blue Ocean Strategy | SWOT to summarize overall landscape, Blue Ocean to guide differentiation direction |
Step 1.3: Design Chapter Skeleton
Produce a hierarchical chapter structure. Each chapter must include:
- Chapter Title — Professional, concise, subject-based (follow titling constraints in Formatting section)
- Analysis Objective — What this chapter aims to reveal
- Analysis Logic — The reasoning chain or framework (must reference the frameworks selected in Step 1.2)
- Core Hypothesis — Preliminary hypotheses to be validated or refuted by data
Chapter Skeleton Output Format
## Analysis Framework
### Chapter 1: [Title]
- **Analysis Objective**: [This chapter aims to...]
- **Analysis Logic**: [Framework or reasoning chain used]
- **Core Hypothesis**: [Hypotheses to validate]
- **Data Requirements**: (see Step 1.4)
- **Visualization Plan**: (see Step 1.5)
### Chapter 2: [Title]
...
Step 1.4: Define Data Query Requirements Per Chapter
For each chapter, specify exactly what data needs to be collected. This is the bridge to downstream data collection skills.
Each data requirement entry must include:
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| Data Metric | The specific metric or data point needed (e.g., "China skincare market size 2020-2025 (in billion CNY)") |
| Data Type | Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed |
| Suggested Sources | Suggested source categories: Industry reports, financial statements, government statistics, social media, e-commerce platforms, survey data, news |
| Search Keywords | Suggested search queries for data collection agents |
| Priority | P0 (Required) / P1 (Important) / P2 (Supplementary) |
| Time Range | The time period the data should cover |
Data Requirements Output Format (per chapter)
#### Data Requirements
| # | Data Metric | Data Type | Suggested Sources | Search Keywords | Priority | Time Range |
|---|-------------|-----------|-------------------|-----------------|----------|------------|
| 1 | Market size (billion CNY) | Quantitative | Industry reports, government statistics | "China skincare market size 2024" | P0 | 2020-2025 |
| 2 | CAGR | Quantitative | Industry reports | "skincare CAGR growth rate" | P0 | 2020-2025 |
how to use consulting-analysisHow to use consulting-analysis on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
1Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add consulting-analysis
2Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
$npx skills add https://github.com/bytedance/deer-flow --skill consulting-analysisThe skills CLI fetches consulting-analysis from GitHub repository bytedance/deer-flow and configures it for Cursor.
3Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
◆ Which agents do you want to install to?││ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────│ • Amp│ • Antigravity│ • Cline│ • Codex│ ●Cursor(selected)│ • Cursor│ • Windsurf4Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/consulting-analysisReload or restart Cursor to activate consulting-analysis. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /consulting-analysis) or your agent's skill management interface.
⚠Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
Additional Resources
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
GET_STARTED →Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
✓Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
✓Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviewsRatings
4.8★★★★★45 reviews- ★★★★★Tariq Desai· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: consulting-analysis is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 20, 2024
We added consulting-analysis from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Kabir Martinez· Dec 20, 2024
consulting-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Okafor· Dec 16, 2024
Useful defaults in consulting-analysis — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Diya Gupta· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend consulting-analysis for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Kabir Li· Nov 23, 2024
Keeps context tight: consulting-analysis is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Kabir Wang· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend consulting-analysis for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 11, 2024
consulting-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Kabir Anderson· Nov 11, 2024
We added consulting-analysis from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Mensah· Oct 14, 2024
Registry listing for consulting-analysis matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 45
1 / 5