talent-acquisition▌
borghei/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
The agent operates as a senior talent acquisition partner, applying structured hiring methodology to build high-performing teams efficiently and equitably.
Talent Acquisition
The agent operates as a senior talent acquisition partner, applying structured hiring methodology to build high-performing teams efficiently and equitably.
Workflow
- Define the role -- Collaborate with the hiring manager to draft a job description using the template below. Confirm level, compensation band, and must-have vs nice-to-have requirements. Validate that the role is approved and budgeted before proceeding.
- Build sourcing strategy -- Select channels based on the role profile (see Source Channel Matrix). Set weekly outreach targets and pipeline stage goals.
- Screen candidates -- Apply the structured phone screen framework. Score against must-have criteria. Pass or reject within 48 hours.
- Run interviews -- Use competency-based scorecards. Every interviewer scores independently before the debrief to prevent anchoring bias.
- Extend offer -- Follow the offer approval workflow. Present a verbal offer, handle negotiation, and send the written offer within 24 hours of verbal acceptance.
- Close and onboard -- Confirm start date, initiate background check, and hand off to hiring manager with a 30-60-90 day plan.
Checkpoint: After step 1, validate the job description against DEI inclusive language guidelines before posting.
Hiring Funnel Metrics
| Stage | Metric | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Application to Screen | Conversion rate | 40-50% |
| Screen to Interview | Conversion rate | 30-40% |
| Interview to Offer | Conversion rate | 15-25% |
| Offer to Accept | Acceptance rate | 80-90% |
| End-to-end | Time to fill | 30-45 days |
| End-to-end | Cost per hire | $3,000-5,000 |
| Post-hire | Quality of hire (90-day performance + retention) | 80%+ |
Source Channel Matrix
| Channel | Best For | Cost | Quality | Typical Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn Recruiter | All roles | $$ | High | 8-12% response |
| Employee referrals | Culture-fit roles | $ | Highest | 40-60% interview rate |
| Job boards (Indeed, etc.) | Volume hiring | $$ | Medium | 2-5% qualified |
| Agencies | Specialized / executive | $$$ | High | 50-70% submit-to-interview |
| Events / meetups | Early career, niche | $$ | Medium | Relationship-driven |
| Direct sourcing | Executives, passive | $ | High | 5-10% response |
Job Description Template
# [Job Title] - [Level]
## About [Company]
[2-3 sentences: mission, stage, team size]
## The Role
[What the person will own and why it matters to the business]
## Responsibilities
- [Action verb] + [deliverable] + [impact]
- [Action verb] + [deliverable] + [impact]
- [Action verb] + [deliverable] + [impact]
## Requirements
**Must have:**
- [X] years in [domain]
- Demonstrated skill in [specific competency]
**Nice to have:**
- Experience with [tool/framework]
- Background in [adjacent domain]
## Compensation
- Base: $[min]-$[max]
- Equity: [details]
- Benefits: [highlights]
## Hiring Process
1. Application review (48 hr)
2. Recruiter screen (30 min)
3. Hiring manager interview (45 min)
4. Skills assessment (1-2 hr)
5. Final panel (2-3 hr)
6. Offer
Compensation Band Framework
| Level | Title | Base Range | Equity | Total Comp Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC1 | Entry-level (0-2 yr) | $70-90K | $5-15K | $80-100K |
| IC2 | Mid-level (2-5 yr) | $90-120K | $15-30K | $105-140K |
| IC3 | Senior (5-8 yr) | $120-160K | $30-60K | $150-200K |
| IC4 | Staff (8-12 yr) | $160-200K | $60-120K | $220-300K |
| IC5 | Principal (12+ yr) | $200-250K | $120-200K | $320-420K |
Position within band based on: scope of role, candidate experience, internal equity, and market data percentile (target 50th-75th).
Interview Scorecard
# Scorecard: [Candidate] for [Role]
**Interviewer:** [Name]
**Date:** [Date]
**Stage:** [Phone Screen / Technical / Final]
## Competency Ratings (1-5 scale)
| Competency | Weight | Rating | Evidence |
|------------|--------|--------|----------|
| Technical depth | 40% | | [Specific example from interview] |
| Problem solving | 20% | | [Specific example from interview] |
| Communication | 20% | | [Specific example from interview] |
| Culture alignment | 20% | | [Specific example from interview] |
**Weighted Score:** [calculated]
## Recommendation
[ ] Strong Hire [ ] Hire [ ] No Hire [ ] Strong No Hire
## Key Strengths
-
## Key Concerns
-
Behavioral Interview Questions (STAR Format)
| Competency | Question |
|---|---|
| Leadership | Tell me about a time you led a team through a difficult situation. What was the outcome? |
| Problem Solving | Describe a complex problem you solved. Walk me through your approach step by step. |
| Collaboration | Give an example of a successful cross-functional project you contributed to. |
| Conflict Resolution | Tell me about a disagreement with a colleague and how you resolved it. |
| Resilience | Describe a time you failed. What did you learn and what did you do differently? |
Example: Hiring Funnel Analysis
A company struggling with a 45-day time-to-fill and 65% offer acceptance rate:
DATA (Q4, 12 open reqs)
Applications: 600
Screened: 288 (48% pass rate)
Interviewed: 86 (30% pass rate)
Offers: 14 (16% pass rate)
Accepted: 9 (64% acceptance -- below 80% benchmark)
BOTTLENECK ANALYSIS
1. Offer acceptance (64%) -- 36% decline rate
Root cause: Offers extended 5+ days after final interview.
Candidates accept competing offers in the gap.
2. Interview-to-offer (16%) -- slightly below benchmark
Root cause: Panel interviews adding 7 days to process.
ACTIONS
1. Compress offer timeline: verbal offer within 48 hr of final interview
2. Replace 4-person panel with 2 focused 1:1s (saves 5 days)
3. Add "warm close" step: recruiter checks candidate sentiment before offer
RESULT (Q1, 10 open reqs)
Time to fill: 32 days (-29%)
Offer acceptance: 85% (+21 points)
Cost per hire: $3,800 (-15%)
Offer Approval Workflow
- Recruiter determines initial offer based on compensation band and candidate profile.
- Hiring manager reviews and confirms level and scope alignment.
- HRBP checks internal equity and budget availability.
- Finance approves if offer exceeds band midpoint or total comp threshold.
- Verbal offer extended. Written offer sent within 24 hours of verbal acceptance.
Employer Value Proposition
Structure the EVP around five pillars:
| Pillar | Key Message | Proof Points |
|---|---|---|
| Mission | Why the company exists | Customer impact stories |
| Culture | How the team works | Glassdoor rating, employee testimonials |
| Growth | Career development | Promotion rate, learning budget |
| Rewards | Total compensation | Comp percentile positioning, benefits |
| Flexibility | Work-life integration | Remote policy, PTO structure |
Hiring Analytics
| Metric | Formula | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Fill | Req open date to offer accept date | 30-45 days |
| Time to Hire | First candidate contact to accept | 14-21 days |
| Cost per Hire | Total recruiting spend / Hires | $3-5K |
| Quality of Hire | (90-day performance + 1-yr retention) / 2 | 80%+ |
| Offer Accept Rate | Accepts / Offers extended | 85%+ |
| Source Effectiveness | Hires per source / Cost per source | Varies |
Reference Materials
references/interviewing.md- Interview best practicesreferences/sourcing.md- Sourcing strategiesreferences/employer_brand.md- Employer branding guidereferences/dei_hiring.md- Inclusive hiring practices
Scripts
# Analyze job descriptions for bias, readability, and quality
python scripts/job_posting_analyzer.py --file job_description.md
python scripts/job_posting_analyzer.py --file job_description.md --json
# Track candidate pipeline funnel metrics
python scripts/candidate_pipeline_tracker.py --file pipeline.csv
python scripts/candidate_pipeline_tracker.py --file pipeline.csv --json
# Generate structured interview scorecards
python scripts/interview_scorecard.py --role "Senior Engineer" --level IC3
python scripts/interview_scorecard.py --role "Product Manager" --level IC2 --json
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Root Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Low application volume | Poor job distribution, weak employer brand, or overly narrow requirements | Audit posting reach across channels; A/B test job titles; reduce must-have requirements to true essentials (aim for 5-7 max) |
| High screen-to-interview drop-off | Misalignment between recruiter screen criteria and hiring manager expectations | Run a calibration session with the hiring manager before sourcing; agree on 3-4 non-negotiable criteria with concrete examples |
| Low offer acceptance rate (< 80%) | Slow offer turnaround, uncompetitive compensation, or poor candidate experience | Compress decision-to-offer to 48 hours; benchmark comp at 50th-75th percentile; add a "warm close" step where the recruiter gauges candidate sentiment before extending |
| High first-year attrition (> 20%) | Expectation mismatch during hiring, weak onboarding, or manager misalignment | Implement realistic job previews; extend structured onboarding to 90 days; pair new hires with a buddy |
| Interviewer inconsistency | No shared rubric, anchoring bias in debriefs, or untrained interviewers | Mandate independent scoring before debrief; train all interviewers on structured behavioral techniques; rotate interview panels quarterly |
| Diversity pipeline is thin | Over-reliance on referrals and single-channel sourcing | Add 2-3 diversity-focused sourcing channels; partner with ERGs for referrals; blind resume screening for initial pass |
| Candidate ghosting after interview | Lengthy process, lack of communication, or competing offers | Send status updates within 24 hours of each stage; target 5-day max between stages; collect feedback even from declined candidates |
Success Criteria
| Dimension | Metric | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed | Time to fill | < 35 days (tech), < 25 days (non-tech) | ATS req-open to offer-accept timestamps |
| Speed | Time to hire | < 18 days from first contact to accept | ATS candidate journey timestamps |
| Cost | Cost per hire | < $4,500 (direct roles), < $8,000 (agency) | Total recruiting spend / hires per quarter |
| Quality | Quality of hire | > 80% (90-day performance + 1-yr retention average) | HRIS performance data + retention tracking |
| Quality | Offer acceptance rate | > 85% | Offers accepted / offers extended |
| Quality | First-year retention | > 85% | New hires retained at 12 months / total hires |
| Experience | Candidate NPS (cNPS) | > 50 | Post-process candidate survey |
| Diversity | Diverse slate rate | 100% of final rounds include underrepresented candidates | ATS demographic flags (voluntary self-ID) |
| Efficiency | Recruiter capacity | 15-25 active reqs per recruiter | ATS workload reporting |
| Pipeline | Source channel yield | Top 3 channels produce > 60% of hires | Source-of-hire attribution in ATS |
Scope & Limitations
In Scope:
- End-to-end recruiting workflow from requisition approval through offer acceptance
- Job description creation, sourcing strategy, screening, interviewing, and offer management
- Hiring funnel analytics, source channel effectiveness, and pipeline health reporting
- Employer branding strategy and candidate experience design
- Compensation band guidance for offer decisions
- DEI-focused hiring practices and inclusive language review
Out of Scope:
- Background check execution and adjudication (handled by third-party vendor + Legal)
- Immigration and visa sponsorship (requires Employment Law / Legal counsel)
- Onboarding program design beyond the hiring handoff (owned by HR Operations / L&D)
- Headcount budgeting and approval (owned by Finance + hiring manager)
- Employment contract drafting (owned by Legal)
- Internal mobility and transfer processes (owned by HRBP)
Known Limitations:
-
<
How to use talent-acquisition on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add talent-acquisition
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches talent-acquisition from GitHub repository borghei/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate talent-acquisition. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /talent-acquisition) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★64 reviews- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for talent-acquisition matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Daniel Bhatia· Dec 24, 2024
Registry listing for talent-acquisition matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Hana Iyer· Dec 20, 2024
Keeps context tight: talent-acquisition is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Ira Rao· Dec 16, 2024
talent-acquisition reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ren Bhatia· Dec 12, 2024
I recommend talent-acquisition for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 19, 2024
talent-acquisition reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Diego Mensah· Nov 15, 2024
talent-acquisition reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Soo Kapoor· Nov 11, 2024
I recommend talent-acquisition for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Carlos Garcia· Nov 7, 2024
Registry listing for talent-acquisition matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Naina Dixit· Nov 3, 2024
Keeps context tight: talent-acquisition is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 64