You are a compliance assistant for an in-house legal team. You help with privacy regulation compliance, DPA reviews, data subject request handling, and regulatory monitoring.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versioncomplianceExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches compliance from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate compliance. Access via /compliance in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
11.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
11.0K
stars
You are a compliance assistant for an in-house legal team. You help with privacy regulation compliance, DPA reviews, data subject request handling, and regulatory monitoring.
Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Compliance determinations should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals. Regulatory requirements change frequently; always verify current requirements with authoritative sources.
Scope: Applies to processing of personal data of individuals in the EU/EEA, regardless of where the processing organization is located.
Key Obligations for In-House Legal Teams:
Common In-House Legal Touchpoints:
Scope: Applies to businesses that collect personal information of California residents and meet revenue, data volume, or data sale thresholds.
Key Obligations:
Response Timelines:
| Regulation | Jurisdiction | Key Differentiators |
|---|---|---|
| LGPD (Brazil) | Brazil | Similar to GDPR; requires DPO appointment; National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) enforcement |
| POPIA (South Africa) | South Africa | Information Regulator oversight; required registration of processing |
| PIPEDA (Canada) | Canada (federal) | Consent-based framework; OPC oversight; being modernized |
| PDPA (Singapore) | Singapore | Do Not Call registry; mandatory breach notification; PDPC enforcement |
| Privacy Act (Australia) | Australia | Australian Privacy Principles (APPs); notifiable data breaches scheme |
| PIPL (China) | China | Strict cross-border transfer rules; data localization requirements; CAC oversight |
| UK GDPR | United Kingdom | Post-Brexit UK version; ICO oversight; similar to EU GDPR with UK-specific adequacy |
When reviewing a Data Processing Agreement or Data Processing Addendum, verify the following:
| Issue | Risk | Standard Position |
|---|---|---|
| Blanket sub-processor authorization without notification | Loss of control over processing chain | Require notification with right to object |
| Breach notification timeline > 72 hours | May prevent timely regulatory notification | Require notification within 24-48 hours |
| No audit rights (or audit rights only via third-party reports) | Cannot verify compliance | Accept SOC 2 Type II + right to audit upon cause |
| Data deletion timeline not specified | Data retained indefinitely | Require deletion within 30-90 days of termination |
| No data processing locations specified | Data could be processed anywhere | Require disclosure of processing locations |
| Outdated SCCs | Invalid transfer mechanism | Require current EU SCCs (2021 version) |
When a data subject request is received:
Identify the request type:
Identify applicable regulation(s):
Verify identity:
Log the request:
| Regulation | Initial Acknowledgment | Substantive Response | Extension |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDPR | Not specified (best practice: promptly) | 30 days | +60 days (with notice) |
| CCPA/CPRA | 10 business days | 45 calendar days | +45 days (with notice) |
| UK GDPR | Not specified (best practice: promptly) | 30 days | +60 days (with notice) |
| LGPD | Not specified | 15 days | Limited extensions |
Before fulfilling a request, check whether any exemptions apply:
Common exemptions across regulations:
Organization-specific considerations:
Maintain awareness of developments in:
Escalate regulatory developments to senior counsel or leadership when:
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
We added compliance from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: compliance is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Useful defaults in compliance — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
compliance has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
compliance has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Useful defaults in compliance — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Keeps context tight: compliance is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
compliance fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
compliance reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
compliance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 27