audit-xls

anthropics/financial-services-plugins · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/financial-services-plugins --skill audit-xls
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Audit formulas and data for accuracy and mistakes. Scope determines depth — from quick formula checks on a selection up to full financial-model integrity audits.

skill.md

Audit Spreadsheet

Audit formulas and data for accuracy and mistakes. Scope determines depth — from quick formula checks on a selection up to full financial-model integrity audits.

Step 1: Determine scope

If the user already gave a scope, use it. Otherwise ask them:

What scope do you want me to audit?

  • selection — just the currently selected range
  • sheet — the current active sheet only
  • model — the whole workbook, including financial-model integrity checks (BS balance, cash tie-out, roll-forwards, logic sanity)

The model scope is the deepest — use it for DCF, LBO, 3-statement, merger, comps, or any integrated financial model before sending to a client or IC.


Step 2: Formula-level checks (ALL scopes)

Run these regardless of scope:

Check What to look for
Formula errors #REF!, #VALUE!, #N/A, #DIV/0!, #NAME?
Hardcodes inside formulas =A1*1.05 — the 1.05 should be a cell reference
Inconsistent formulas A formula that breaks the pattern of its neighbors in a row/column
Off-by-one ranges SUM/AVERAGE that misses the first or last row
Pasted-over formulas Cell that looks like a formula but is actually a hardcoded value
Circular references Intentional or accidental
Broken cross-sheet links References to cells that moved or were deleted
Unit/scale mismatches Thousands mixed with millions, % stored as whole numbers
Hidden rows/tabs Could contain overrides or stale calculations

Step 3: Model-integrity checks (MODEL scope only)

If scope is model, identify the model type (DCF / LBO / 3-statement / merger / comps / custom) and run the appropriate integrity checks below.

3a. Structural review

Check What to look for
Input/formula separation Are inputs clearly separated from calculations?
Color convention Blue=input, black=formula, green=link — or whatever the model uses, applied consistently?
Tab flow Logical order (Assumptions → IS → BS → CF → Valuation)?
Date headers Consistent across all tabs?
Units Consistent (thousands vs millions vs actuals)?

3b. Balance Sheet

Check Test
BS balances Total Assets = Total Liabilities + Equity (every period)
RE rollforward Prior RE + Net Income − Dividends = Current RE
Goodwill/intangibles Flow from acquisition assumptions (if M&A)

If BS doesn't balance, quantify the gap per period and trace where it breaks — nothing else matters until this is fixed.

3c. Cash Flow Statement

Check Test
Cash tie-out CF Ending Cash = BS Cash (every period)
CF sums CFO + CFI + CFF = Δ Cash
D&A match D&A on CF = D&A on IS
CapEx match CapEx on CF matches PP&E rollforward on BS
WC changes Signs match BS movements (ΔAR, ΔAP, ΔInventory)

3d. Income Statement

Check Test
Revenue build Ties to segment/product detail
Tax Tax expense = Pre-tax income × tax rate (allow for deferred tax adj)
Share count Ties to dilution schedule (options, converts, buybacks)

3e. Circular references

  • Interest → debt balance → cash → interest is a common intentional circ in LBO/3-stmt models
  • If intentional: verify iteration toggle exists and works
  • If unintentional: trace the loop and flag how to break it

3f. Logic & reasonableness

Check Flag if
Growth rates >100% revenue growth without explanation
Margins Outside industry norms
Terminal value dominance TV > ~75% of DCF EV (yellow flag)
Hockey-stick Projections ramp unrealistically in out-years
Compounding EBITDA compounds to absurd $ by Year 10
Edge cases Model breaks at 0% or negative growth, negative EBITDA, leverage goes negative

3g. Model-type-specific bugs

DCF:

  • Discount rate applied to wrong period (mid-year vs end-of-year)
  • Terminal value not discounted back
  • WACC uses book values instead of market values
  • FCF includes interest expense (should be unlevered)
  • Tax shield double-counted

LBO:

  • Debt paydown doesn't match cash sweep mechanics
  • PIK interest not accruing to principal
  • Management rollover not reflected in returns
  • Exit multiple applied to wrong EBITDA (LTM vs NTM)
  • Fees/expenses not deducted from Day 1 equity

Merger:

  • Accretion/dilution uses wrong share count (pre- vs post-deal)
  • Synergies not phased in
  • Purchase price allocation doesn't balance
  • Foregone interest on cash not included
  • Transaction fees not in sources & uses

3-statement:

  • Working capital changes have wrong sign
  • Depreciation doesn't match PP&E schedule
  • Debt maturity schedule doesn't match principal payments
  • Dividends exceed net income without explanation

Step 4: Report

Output a findings table:

# Sheet Cell/Range Severity Category Issue Suggested Fix

Severity:

  • Critical — wrong output (BS doesn't balance, formula broken, cash doesn't tie)
  • Warning — risky (hardcodes, inconsistent formulas, edge-case failures)
  • Info — style/best-practice (color coding, layout, naming)

For model scope, prepend a summary line:

Model type: [DCF/LBO/3-stmt/...] — Overall: [Clean / Minor Issues / Major Issues] — [N] critical, [N] warnings, [N] info

Don't change anything without asking — report first, fix on request.


Notes

  • BS balance first — if it doesn't balance, everything downstream is suspect
  • Hardcoded overrides are the #1 source of silent bugs — search aggressively
  • Sign convention errors (positive vs negative for cash outflows) are extremely common
  • If the model uses VBA macros, note any macro-driven calculations that can't be audited from formulas alone
how to use audit-xls

How to use audit-xls on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add audit-xls
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/financial-services-plugins --skill audit-xls

The skills CLI fetches audit-xls from GitHub repository anthropics/financial-services-plugins and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/audit-xls

Reload or restart Cursor to activate audit-xls. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /audit-xls) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.730 reviews
  • Arya Iyer· Dec 28, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: audit-xls is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 24, 2024

    audit-xls reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Amelia Srinivasan· Dec 20, 2024

    Registry listing for audit-xls matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 16, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: audit-xls is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Noor Ndlovu· Dec 8, 2024

    audit-xls reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Hassan Sanchez· Nov 19, 2024

    We added audit-xls from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Piyush G· Nov 7, 2024

    We added audit-xls from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Shikha Mishra· Oct 26, 2024

    audit-xls fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Arjun Kapoor· Oct 10, 2024

    audit-xls fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Benjamin Mehta· Sep 25, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: audit-xls is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 30

1 / 3