ui-testing▌
alinaqi/claude-bootstrap · updated Apr 28, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Load with: ui-web.md or ui-mobile.md
UI Verification Skill
Load with: ui-web.md or ui-mobile.md
Purpose
Quick verification that generated UI meets accessibility standards. Run these checks after creating any new UI components.
Pre-Flight Checklist
Before Shipping ANY UI:
## Visibility Check
- [ ] All buttons have visible background OR border
- [ ] No text is same color as its background
- [ ] All text meets 4.5:1 contrast ratio
- [ ] Ghost/text buttons have visible borders
## Touch/Click Targets
- [ ] All buttons are minimum 44px height
- [ ] Icon buttons are minimum 44x44px
- [ ] Adequate spacing between clickable elements
## States
- [ ] Hover states visible (web)
- [ ] Pressed states visible (mobile)
- [ ] Focus rings on keyboard navigation
- [ ] Disabled states visually distinct (opacity 0.5)
- [ ] Loading states show indicators
## Dark Mode (if applicable)
- [ ] Text readable on dark backgrounds
- [ ] Borders visible in dark mode
- [ ] No gray-400 text on dark backgrounds
## Responsive (web)
- [ ] No horizontal scroll on mobile (320px)
- [ ] Content readable at all breakpoints
- [ ] Touch targets adequate on mobile
Quick Contrast Check
Use Browser DevTools
1. Right-click element → Inspect
2. In Styles panel, click on color value
3. Look for contrast ratio display
4. Must show ✓ for AA compliance (4.5:1 for text)
Online Tools
Tailwind Safe Combinations
LIGHT MODE (on white bg):
✓ text-gray-900 (#111827) = 16:1
✓ text-gray-800 (#1F2937) = 12:1
✓ text-gray-700 (#374151) = 9:1
✓ text-gray-600 (#4B5563) = 6:1
✗ text-gray-500 (#6B7280) = 4.6:1 (barely)
✗ text-gray-400 (#9CA3AF) = 2.6:1 (FAILS)
DARK MODE (on gray-900 bg):
✓ text-white (#FFFFFF) = 16:1
✓ text-gray-100 (#F3F4F6) = 13:1
✓ text-gray-200 (#E5E7EB) = 11:1
✓ text-gray-300 (#D1D5DB) = 8:1
✗ text-gray-400 (#9CA3AF) = 5:1 (barely)
✗ text-gray-500 (#6B7280) = 3:1 (FAILS)
Common Fixes
Invisible Button
// PROBLEM: No visible boundary
<button className="text-gray-500">Click</button>
// FIX: Add background OR border
<button className="bg-gray-100 text-gray-900 px-4 py-3 rounded-lg">
Click
</button>
// OR
<button className="border border-gray-300 text-gray-700 px-4 py-3 rounded-lg">
Click
</button>
Low Contrast Text
// PROBLEM: Light gray on white
<p className="text-gray-400">Secondary text</p>
// FIX: Use darker gray
<p className="text-gray-600">Secondary text</p>
Missing Focus State
// PROBLEM: Focus removed without replacement
<button className="outline-none">Submit</button>
// FIX: Add visible focus ring
<button className="outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-blue-500 focus-visible:ring-offset-2">
Submit
</button>
Small Touch Target
// PROBLEM: Too small for fingers
<button className="p-1 text-sm">×</button>
// FIX: Minimum 44px
<button className="w-11 h-11 flex items-center justify-center">×</button>
Dark Mode Broken
// PROBLEM: Same colors in both modes
<p className="text-gray-400">Text</p>
// FIX: Adjust for dark mode
<p className="text-gray-600 dark:text-gray-300">Text</p>
Automated Checks (Optional)
ESLint Plugin
npm install -D eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y
// .eslintrc
{
"extends": ["plugin:jsx-a11y/recommended"]
}
Playwright Quick Test
// e2e/accessibility.spec.ts
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
import AxeBuilder from '@axe-core/playwright';
test('no accessibility violations', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('/');
const results = await new AxeBuilder({ page }).analyze();
expect(results.violations).toEqual([]);
});
When to Use Full Testing
Add comprehensive visual testing (Playwright screenshots, Storybook) when:
- Building a component library
- Multiple developers on UI
- Frequent UI changes
- Design system enforcement needed
For solo projects or MVPs, the checklist above is sufficient.
How to use ui-testing on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add ui-testing
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches ui-testing from GitHub repository alinaqi/claude-bootstrap and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate ui-testing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /ui-testing) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★27 reviews- ★★★★★Chen Perez· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: ui-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Camila Sethi· Dec 12, 2024
We added ui-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 8, 2024
ui-testing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend ui-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 27, 2024
Keeps context tight: ui-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Harper Haddad· Nov 19, 2024
ui-testing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Chen Thomas· Nov 3, 2024
Useful defaults in ui-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Kiara Lopez· Oct 22, 2024
ui-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Oct 18, 2024
Registry listing for ui-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Zaid Menon· Oct 10, 2024
ui-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 27