accessibility▌
addyosmani/web-quality-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines and best practices.
- ›Covers all four WCAG principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust) with conformance levels A, AA, and AAA
- ›Includes code examples for text alternatives, color contrast, keyboard navigation, focus management, form labels, error handling, and ARIA usage
- ›Provides testing checklist with automated tools (Lighthouse, axe-core) and manual testing procedures for keyboard, screen reader, zoom, an
Accessibility (a11y)
Comprehensive accessibility guidelines based on WCAG 2.2 and Lighthouse accessibility audits. Goal: make content usable by everyone, including people with disabilities.
WCAG Principles: POUR
| Principle | Description |
|---|---|
| Perceivable | Content can be perceived through different senses |
| Operable | Interface can be operated by all users |
| Understandable | Content and interface are understandable |
| Robust | Content works with assistive technologies |
Conformance levels
| Level | Requirement | Target |
|---|---|---|
| A | Minimum accessibility | Must pass |
| AA | Standard compliance | Should pass (legal requirement in many jurisdictions) |
| AAA | Enhanced accessibility | Nice to have |
Perceivable
Text alternatives (1.1)
Images require alt text:
<!-- ❌ Missing alt -->
<img src="chart.png">
<!-- ✅ Descriptive alt -->
<img src="chart.png" alt="Bar chart showing 40% increase in Q3 sales">
<!-- ✅ Decorative image (empty alt) -->
<img src="decorative-border.png" alt="" role="presentation">
<!-- ✅ Complex image with longer description -->
<figure>
<img src="infographic.png" alt="2024 market trends infographic"
aria-describedby="infographic-desc">
<figcaption id="infographic-desc">
<!-- Detailed description -->
</figcaption>
</figure>
Icon buttons need accessible names:
<!-- ❌ No accessible name -->
<button><svg><!-- menu icon --></svg></button>
<!-- ✅ Using aria-label -->
<button aria-label="Open menu">
<svg aria-hidden="true"><!-- menu icon --></svg>
</button>
<!-- ✅ Using visually hidden text -->
<button>
<svg aria-hidden="true"><!-- menu icon --></svg>
<span class="visually-hidden">Open menu</span>
</button>
Visually hidden class:
.visually-hidden {
position: absolute;
width: 1px;
height: 1px;
padding: 0;
margin: -1px;
overflow: hidden;
clip: rect(0, 0, 0, 0);
white-space: nowrap;
border: 0;
}
Color contrast (1.4.3, 1.4.6)
| Text Size | AA minimum | AAA enhanced |
|---|---|---|
| Normal text (< 18px / < 14px bold) | 4.5:1 | 7:1 |
| Large text (≥ 18px / ≥ 14px bold) | 3:1 | 4.5:1 |
| UI components & graphics | 3:1 | 3:1 |
/* ❌ Low contrast (2.5:1) */
.low-contrast {
color: #999;
background: #fff;
}
/* ✅ Sufficient contrast (7:1) */
.high-contrast {
color: #333;
background: #fff;
}
/* ✅ Focus states need contrast too */
:focus-visible {
outline: 2px solid #005fcc;
outline-offset: 2px;
}
Don't rely on color alone:
<!-- ❌ Only color indicates error -->
<input class="error-border">
<style>.error-border { border-color: red; }</style>
<!-- ✅ Color + icon + text -->
<div class="field-error">
<input aria-invalid="true" aria-describedby="email-error">
<span id="email-error" class="error-message">
<svg aria-hidden="true"><!-- error icon --></svg>
Please enter a valid email address
</span>
</div>
Media alternatives (1.2)
<!-- Video with captions -->
<video controls>
<source src="video.mp4" type="video/mp4">
<track kind="captions" src="captions.vtt" srclang="en" label="English" default>
<track kind="descriptions" src="descriptions.vtt" srclang="en" label="Descriptions">
</video>
<!-- Audio with transcript -->
<audio controls>
<source src="podcast.mp3" type="audio/mp3">
</How to use accessibility on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add accessibility
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches accessibility from GitHub repository addyosmani/web-quality-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate accessibility. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /accessibility) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★65 reviews- ★★★★★Dev Liu· Dec 28, 2024
accessibility has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Michael Sethi· Dec 24, 2024
accessibility reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Fatima Johnson· Dec 16, 2024
We added accessibility from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Li Jackson· Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: accessibility is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Aisha Torres· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: accessibility is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★James Liu· Nov 23, 2024
accessibility has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Layla Ndlovu· Nov 23, 2024
accessibility is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★James Zhang· Nov 19, 2024
accessibility reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Harris· Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: accessibility is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Michael Patel· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend accessibility for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 65