scikit-survival▌
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · updated Jun 4, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
### Scikit Survival
- ›name: "scikit-survival"
- ›description: "Comprehensive toolkit for survival analysis and time-to-event modeling in Python using scikit-survival. Use this skill when working with censored survival data, performing time-to-event analysis, fitt..."
| name | scikit-survival |
| description | Comprehensive toolkit for survival analysis and time-to-event modeling in Python using scikit-survival. Use this skill when working with censored survival data, performing time-to-event analysis, fitting Cox models, Random Survival Forests, Gradient Boosting models, or Survival SVMs, evaluating survival predictions with concordance index or Brier score, handling competing risks, or implementing any survival analysis workflow with the scikit-survival library. |
| license | GPL-3.0 license |
| metadata | version: "1.0" skill-author: K-Dense Inc. |
scikit-survival: Survival Analysis in Python
Overview
scikit-survival is a Python library for survival analysis built on top of scikit-learn. It provides specialized tools for time-to-event analysis, handling the unique challenge of censored data where some observations are only partially known.
Survival analysis aims to establish connections between covariates and the time of an event, accounting for censored records (particularly right-censored data from studies where participants don't experience events during observation periods).
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Performing survival analysis or time-to-event modeling
- Working with censored data (right-censored, left-censored, or interval-censored)
- Fitting Cox proportional hazards models (standard or penalized)
- Building ensemble survival models (Random Survival Forests, Gradient Boosting)
- Training Survival Support Vector Machines
- Evaluating survival model performance (concordance index, Brier score, time-dependent AUC)
- Estimating Kaplan-Meier or Nelson-Aalen curves
- Analyzing competing risks
- Preprocessing survival data or handling missing values in survival datasets
- Conducting any analysis using the scikit-survival library
Core Capabilities
1. Model Types and Selection
scikit-survival provides multiple model families, each suited for different scenarios:
Cox Proportional Hazards Models
Use for: Standard survival analysis with interpretable coefficients
CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis: Basic Cox modelCoxnetSurvivalAnalysis: Penalized Cox with elastic net for high-dimensional dataIPCRidge: Ridge regression for accelerated failure time models
See: references/cox-models.md for detailed guidance on Cox models, regularization, and interpretation
Ensemble Methods
Use for: High predictive performance with complex non-linear relationships
RandomSurvivalForest: Robust, non-parametric ensemble methodGradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis: Tree-based boosting for maximum performanceComponentwiseGradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis: Linear boosting with feature selectionExtraSurvivalTrees: Extremely randomized trees for additional regularization
See: references/ensemble-models.md for comprehensive guidance on ensemble methods, hyperparameter tuning, and when to use each model
Survival Support Vector Machines
Use for: Medium-sized datasets with margin-based learning
FastSurvivalSVM: Linear SVM optimized for speedFastKernelSurvivalSVM: Kernel SVM for non-linear relationshipsHingeLossSurvivalSVM: SVM with hinge lossClinicalKernelTransform: Specialized kernel for clinical + molecular data
See: references/svm-models.md for detailed SVM guidance, kernel selection, and hyperparameter tuning
Model Selection Decision Tree
Start
├─ High-dimensional data (p > n)?
│ ├─ Yes → CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis (elastic net)
│ └─ No → Continue
│
├─ Need interpretable coefficients?
│ ├─ Yes → CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis or ComponentwiseGradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
│ └─ No → Continue
│
├─ Complex non-linear relationships expected?
│ ├─ Yes
│ │ ├─ Large dataset (n > 1000) → GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
│ │ ├─ Medium dataset → RandomSurvivalForest or FastKernelSurvivalSVM
│ │ └─ Small dataset → RandomSurvivalForest
│ └─ No → CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis or FastSurvivalSVM
│
└─ For maximum performance → Try multiple models and compare
2. Data Preparation and Preprocessing
Before modeling, properly prepare survival data:
Creating Survival Outcomes
from sksurv.util import Surv
# From separate arrays
y = Surv.from_arrays(event=event_array, time=time_array)
# From DataFrame
y = Surv.from_dataframe('event', 'time', df)
Essential Preprocessing Steps
- Handle missing values: Imputation strategies for features
- Encode categorical variables: One-hot encoding or label encoding
- Standardize features: Critical for SVMs and regularized Cox models
- Validate data quality: Check for negative times, sufficient events per feature
- Train-test split: Maintain similar censoring rates across splits
See: references/data-handling.md for complete preprocessing workflows, data validation, and best practices
3. Model Evaluation
Proper evaluation is critical for survival models. Use appropriate metrics that account for censoring:
Concordance Index (C-index)
Primary metric for ranking/discrimination:
- Harrell's C-index: Use for low censoring (<40%)
- Uno's C-index: Use for moderate to high censoring (>40%) - more robust
from sksurv.metrics import concordance_index_censored, concordance_index_ipcw
# Harrell's C-index
c_harrell = concordance_index_censored(y_test['event'], y_test['time'], risk_scores)[0]
# Uno's C-index (recommended)
c_uno = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]
Time-Dependent AUC
Evaluate discrimination at specific time points:
from sksurv.metrics import cumulative_dynamic_auc
times = [365, 730, 1095] # 1, 2, 3 years
auc, mean_auc = cumulative_dynamic_auc(y_train, y_test, risk_scores, times)
Brier Score
Assess both discrimination and calibration:
from sksurv.metrics import integrated_brier_score
ibs = integrated_brier_score(y_train, y_test, survival_functions, times)
See: references/evaluation-metrics.md for comprehensive evaluation guidance, metric selection, and using scorers with cross-validation
4. Competing Risks Analysis
Handle situations with multiple mutually exclusive event types:
from sksurv.nonparametric import cumulative_incidence_competing_risks
# Estimate cumulative incidence for each event type
time_points, cif_event1, cif_event2 = cumulative_incidence_competing_risks(y)
Use competing risks when:
- Multiple mutually exclusive event types exist (e.g., death from different causes)
- Occurrence of one event prevents others
- Need probability estimates for specific event types
See: references/competing-risks.md for detailed competing risks methods, cause-specific hazard models, and interpretation
5. Non-parametric Estimation
Estimate survival functions without parametric assumptions:
Kaplan-Meier Estimator
from sksurv.nonparametric import kaplan_meier_estimator
time, survival_prob = kaplan_meier_estimator(y['event'], y['time'])
Nelson-Aalen Estimator
from sksurv.nonparametric import nelson_aalen_estimator
time, cumulative_hazard = nelson_aalen_estimator(y['event'], y['time'])
Typical Workflows
Workflow 1: Standard Survival Analysis
from sksurv.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sksurv.linear_model import CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.metrics import concordance_index_ipcw
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
# 1. Load and prepare data
X, y = load_breast_cancer()
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
# 2. Preprocess
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test_scaled = scaler.transform(X_test)
# 3. Fit model
estimator = CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis()
estimator.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
# 4. Predict
risk_scores = estimator.predict(X_test_scaled)
# 5. Evaluate
c_index = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]
print(f"C-index: {c_index:.3f}")
Workflow 2: High-Dimensional Data with Feature Selection
from sksurv.linear_model import CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV
from sksurv.metrics import as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer
# 1. Use penalized Cox for feature selection
estimator = CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis(l1_ratio=0.9) # Lasso-like
# 2. Tune regularization with cross-validation
param_grid = {'alpha_min_ratio': [0.01, 0.001]}
cv = GridSearchCV(estimator, param_grid,
scoring=as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer(), cv=5)
cv.fit(X, y)
# 3. Identify selected features
best_model = cv.best_estimator_
selected_features = np.where(best_model.coef_ != 0)[0]
Workflow 3: Ensemble Method for Maximum Performance
from sksurv.ensemble import GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV
# 1. Define parameter grid
param_grid = {
'learning_rate': [0.01, 0.05, 0.1],
'n_estimators': [100, 200, 300],
'max_depth': [3, 5, 7]
}
# 2. Grid search
gbs = GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis()
cv = GridSearchCV(gbs, param_grid, cv=5,
scoring=as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer(), n_jobs=-1)
cv.fit(X_train, y_train)
# 3. Evaluate best model
best_model = cv.best_estimator_
risk_scores = best_model.predict(X_test)
c_index = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]
Workflow 4: Comprehensive Model Comparison
from sksurv.linear_model import CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.ensemble import RandomSurvivalForest, GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.svm import FastSurvivalSVM
from sksurv.metrics import concordance_index_ipcw, integrated_brier_score
# Define models
models = {
'Cox': CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis(),
'RSF': RandomSurvivalForest(n_estimators=100, random_state=42),
'GBS': GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis(random_state=42),
'SVM': FastSurvivalSVM(random_state=42)
}
# Evaluate each model
results = {}
for name, model in models.items():
model.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
risk_scores = model.predict(X_test_scaled)
c_index = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]
results[name] = c_index
print(f"{name}: C-index = {c_index:.3f}")
# Select best model
best_model_name = max(results, key=results.get)
print(f"\nBest model: {best_model_name}")
Integration with scikit-learn
scikit-survival fully integrates with scikit-learn's ecosystem:
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score, GridSearchCV
# Use pipelines
pipeline = Pipeline([
('scaler', StandardScaler()),
('model', CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis())
])
# Use cross-validation
scores = cross_val_score(pipeline, X, y, cv=5,
scoring=as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer())
# Use grid search
param_grid = {'model__alpha': [0.1, 1.0, 10.0]}
cv = GridSearchCV(pipeline, param_grid, cv=5)
cv.fit(X, y)
Best Practices
- Always standardize features for SVMs and regularized Cox models
- Use Uno's C-index instead of Harrell's when censoring > 40%
- Report multiple evaluation metrics (C-index, integrated Brier score, time-dependent AUC)
- Check proportional hazards assumption for Cox models
- Use cross-validation for hyperparameter tuning with appropriate scorers
- Validate data quality before modeling (check for negative times, sufficient events per feature)
- Compare multiple model types to find best performance
- Use permutation importance for Random Survival Forests (not built-in importance)
- Consider competing risks when multiple event types exist
- Document censoring mechanism and rates in analysis
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Using Harrell's C-index with high censoring → Use Uno's C-index
- Not standardizing features for SVMs → Always standardize
- Forgetting to pass y_train to concordance_index_ipcw → Required for IPCW calculation
- Treating competing events as censored → Use competing risks methods
- Not checking for sufficient events per feature → Rule of thumb: 10+ events per feature
- Using built-in feature importance for RSF → Use permutation importance
- Ignoring proportional hazards assumption → Validate or use alternative models
- Not using appropriate scorers in cross-validation → Use as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer()
Reference Files
This skill includes detailed reference files for specific topics:
references/cox-models.md: Complete guide to Cox proportional hazards models, penalized Cox (CoxNet), IPCRidge, regularization strategies, and interpretationreferences/ensemble-models.md: Random Survival Forests, Gradient Boosting, hyperparameter tuning, feature importance, and model selectionreferences/evaluation-metrics.md: Concordance index (Harrell's vs Uno's), time-dependent AUC, Brier score, comprehensive evaluation pipelinesreferences/data-handling.md: Data loading, preprocessing workflows, handling missing data, feature encoding, validation checksreferences/svm-models.md: Survival Support Vector Machines, kernel selection, clinical kernel transform, hyperparameter tuningreferences/competing-risks.md: Competing risks analysis, cumulative incidence functions, cause-specific hazard models
Load these reference files when detailed information is needed for specific tasks.
Additional Resources
- Official Documentation: https://scikit-survival.readthedocs.io/
- GitHub Repository: https://github.com/sebp/scikit-survival
- Built-in Datasets: Use
sksurv.datasetsfor practice datasets (GBSG2, WHAS500, veterans lung cancer, etc.) - API Reference: Complete list of classes and functions at https://scikit-survival.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/index.html
Quick Reference: Key Imports
# Models
from sksurv.linear_model import CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis, CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis, IPCRidge
from sksurv.ensemble import RandomSurvivalForest, GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.svm import FastSurvivalSVM, FastKernelSurvivalSVM
from sksurv.tree import SurvivalTree
# Evaluation metrics
from sksurv.metrics import (
concordance_index_censored,
concordance_index_ipcw,
cumulative_dynamic_auc,
brier_score,
integrated_brier_score,
as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer,
as_integrated_brier_score_scorer
)
# Non-parametric estimation
from sksurv.nonparametric import (
kaplan_meier_estimator,
nelson_aalen_estimator,
cumulative_incidence_competing_risks
)
# Data handling
from sksurv.util import Surv
from sksurv.preprocessing import OneHotEncoder, encode_categorical
from sksurv.datasets import load_gbsg2, load_breast_cancer, load_veterans_lung_cancer
# Kernels
from sksurv.kernels import ClinicalKernelTransform
How to use scikit-survival on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add scikit-survival
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches scikit-survival from GitHub repository K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate scikit-survival. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /scikit-survival) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★38 reviews- ★★★★★Omar Okafor· Dec 20, 2024
scikit-survival fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ira Iyer· Dec 20, 2024
Useful defaults in scikit-survival — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Noah Shah· Nov 11, 2024
scikit-survival is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Noor Gupta· Nov 11, 2024
I recommend scikit-survival for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Dev Sanchez· Oct 2, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: scikit-survival is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Noah Sharma· Oct 2, 2024
Keeps context tight: scikit-survival is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Sep 17, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: scikit-survival is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Jin Dixit· Sep 17, 2024
scikit-survival fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Noor Kapoor· Sep 9, 2024
I recommend scikit-survival for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Diya Agarwal· Aug 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: scikit-survival is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 38