pymoo

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · updated Jun 4, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill pymoo
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

### Pymoo

  • name: "pymoo"
  • description: "Multi-objective optimization framework. NSGA-II, NSGA-III, MOEA/D, Pareto fronts, constraint handling, benchmarks (ZDT, DTLZ), for engineering design and optimization problems."
  • allowed-tools: "Read Write Edit Bash"
skill.md
name
pymoo
description
Multi-objective optimization framework. NSGA-II, NSGA-III, MOEA/D, Pareto fronts, constraint handling, benchmarks (ZDT, DTLZ), for engineering design and optimization problems.
license
Apache-2.0 license
allowed-tools
Read Write Edit Bash
compatibility
Requires Python 3.10+ and pymoo (uv pip install). Optional matplotlib for visualization plots; optional autograd for gradient-based features; optional joblib for JoblibParallelization.
metadata
version: "1.1" skill-author: K-Dense Inc.

Pymoo - Multi-Objective Optimization in Python

Overview

Pymoo is a comprehensive Python framework for optimization with emphasis on multi-objective problems. Solve single and multi-objective optimization using state-of-the-art algorithms (NSGA-II/III, MOEA/D, SPEA2), benchmark problems (ZDT, DTLZ), customizable genetic operators, and multi-criteria decision making methods. Excels at finding trade-off solutions (Pareto fronts) for problems with conflicting objectives. Current stable release: pymoo 0.6.1.6 (November 2025).

Installation

uv pip install pymoo

For reproducible environments, pin a version: uv pip install "pymoo==0.6.1.6".

Dependencies: NumPy (2.x compatible since 0.6.1.3), SciPy, matplotlib (visualization). Autograd is optional for gradient-based features (since 0.6.1.3).

Documentation: https://pymoo.org/ — LLM-friendly index: https://pymoo.org/llms.txt

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

  • Solving optimization problems with one or multiple objectives
  • Finding Pareto-optimal solutions and analyzing trade-offs
  • Implementing evolutionary algorithms (GA, DE, PSO, NSGA-II/III)
  • Working with constrained optimization problems
  • Benchmarking algorithms on standard test problems (ZDT, DTLZ, WFG)
  • Customizing genetic operators (crossover, mutation, selection)
  • Visualizing high-dimensional optimization results
  • Making decisions from multiple competing solutions
  • Handling binary, discrete, continuous, or mixed-variable problems

Core Concepts

The Unified Interface

Pymoo uses a consistent minimize() function for all optimization tasks:

from pymoo.optimize import minimize

result = minimize(
    problem,        # What to optimize
    algorithm,      # How to optimize
    termination,    # When to stop
    seed=1,
    verbose=True
)

Result object contains:

  • result.X: Decision variables of optimal solution(s)
  • result.F: Objective values of optimal solution(s)
  • result.G: Constraint violations (if constrained)
  • result.algorithm: Algorithm object with history

Problem Definition Styles

Pymoo supports three problem definition styles:

  • Problem: Vectorized — _evaluate receives a batch of solutions (matrix)
  • ElementwiseProblem: One solution per call — recommended for custom problems and parallel evaluation
  • FunctionalProblem: Define objectives and constraints as separate functions without subclassing

Problem Types

Single-objective: One objective to minimize/maximize Multi-objective: 2-3 conflicting objectives → Pareto front Many-objective: 4+ objectives → High-dimensional Pareto front Constrained: Objectives + inequality/equality constraints Mixed-variable: Continuous, integer, binary, and categorical variables in one problem Dynamic: Time-varying objectives or constraints

Quick Start Workflows

Workflow 1: Single-Objective Optimization

When: Optimizing one objective function

Steps:

  1. Define or select problem
  2. Choose single-objective algorithm (GA, DE, PSO, CMA-ES)
  3. Configure termination criteria
  4. Run optimization
  5. Extract best solution

Example:

from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize

# Built-in problem
problem = get_problem("rastrigin", n_var=10)

# Configure Genetic Algorithm
algorithm = GA(
    pop_size=100,
    eliminate_duplicates=True
)

# Optimize
result = minimize(
    problem,
    algorithm,
    ('n_gen', 200),
    seed=1,
    verbose=True
)

print(f"Best solution: {result.X}")
print(f"Best objective: {result.F[0]}")

See: scripts/single_objective_example.py for complete example

Workflow 2: Multi-Objective Optimization (2-3 objectives)

When: Optimizing 2-3 conflicting objectives, need Pareto front

Algorithm choice: NSGA-II (standard for bi/tri-objective)

Steps:

  1. Define multi-objective problem
  2. Configure NSGA-II
  3. Run optimization to obtain Pareto front
  4. Visualize trade-offs
  5. Apply decision making (optional)

Example:

from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga2 import NSGA2
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.visualization.scatter import Scatter

# Bi-objective benchmark problem
problem = get_problem("zdt1")

# NSGA-II algorithm
algorithm = NSGA2(pop_size=100)

# Optimize
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, ('n_gen', 200), seed=1)

# Visualize Pareto front
plot = Scatter()
plot.add(result.F, label="Obtained Front")
plot.add(problem.pareto_front(), label="True Front", alpha=0.3)
plot.show()

print(f"Found {len(result.F)} Pareto-optimal solutions")

See: scripts/multi_objective_example.py for complete example

Workflow 3: Many-Objective Optimization (4+ objectives)

When: Optimizing 4 or more objectives

Algorithm choice: NSGA-III (designed for many objectives)

Key difference: Must provide reference directions for population guidance

Steps:

  1. Define many-objective problem
  2. Generate reference directions
  3. Configure NSGA-III with reference directions
  4. Run optimization
  5. Visualize using Parallel Coordinate Plot

Example:

from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga3 import NSGA3
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.util.ref_dirs import get_reference_directions
from pymoo.visualization.pcp import PCP

# Many-objective problem (5 objectives)
problem = get_problem("dtlz2", n_obj=5)

# Generate reference directions (required for NSGA-III)
ref_dirs = get_reference_directions("das-dennis", n_obj=5, n_partitions=12)

# Configure NSGA-III
algorithm = NSGA3(ref_dirs=ref_dirs)

# Optimize
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, ('n_gen', 300), seed=1)

# Visualize with Parallel Coordinates
plot = PCP(labels=[f"f{i+1}" for i in range(5)])
plot.add(result.F, alpha=0.3)
plot.show()

See: scripts/many_objective_example.py for complete example

Workflow 4: Custom Problem Definition

When: Solving domain-specific optimization problem

Steps:

  1. Extend ElementwiseProblem class
  2. Define __init__ with problem dimensions and bounds
  3. Implement _evaluate method for objectives (and constraints)
  4. Use with any algorithm

Unconstrained example:

from pymoo.core.problem import ElementwiseProblem
import numpy as np

class MyProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__(
            n_var=2,              # Number of variables
            n_obj=2,              # Number of objectives
            xl=np.array([0, 0]),  # Lower bounds
            xu=np.array([5, 5])   # Upper bounds
        )

    def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
        # Define objectives
        f1 = x[0]**2 + x[1]**2
        f2 = (x[0]-1)**2 + (x[1]-1)**2

        out["F"] = [f1, f2]

Constrained example:

class ConstrainedProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__(
            n_var=2,
            n_obj=2,
            n_ieq_constr=2,        # Inequality constraints
            n_eq_constr=1,         # Equality constraints
            xl=np.array([0, 0]),
            xu=np.array([5, 5])
        )

    def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
        # Objectives
        out["F"] = [f1, f2]

        # Inequality constraints (g <= 0)
        out["G"] = [g1, g2]

        # Equality constraints (h = 0)
        out["H"] = [h1]

Constraint formulation rules:

  • Inequality: Express as g(x) <= 0 (feasible when ≤ 0)
  • Equality: Express as h(x) = 0 (feasible when = 0)
  • Convert g(x) >= b to -(g(x) - b) <= 0

See: scripts/custom_problem_example.py for complete examples

Workflow 5: Constraint Handling

When: Problem has feasibility constraints

Approach options:

1. Feasibility First (Default - Recommended)

from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga2 import NSGA2

# Works automatically with constrained problems
algorithm = NSGA2(pop_size=100)
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, termination)

# Check feasibility
feasible = result.CV[:, 0] == 0  # CV = constraint violation
print(f"Feasible solutions: {np.sum(feasible)}")

2. Penalty Method

from pymoo.constraints.as_penalty import ConstraintsAsPenalty

# Wrap problem to convert constraints to penalties
problem_penalized = ConstraintsAsPenalty(problem, penalty=1e6)

3. Constraint as Objective

from pymoo.constraints.as_obj import ConstraintsAsObjective

# Treat constraint violation as additional objective
problem_with_cv = ConstraintsAsObjective(problem)

4. Specialized Algorithms

from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.sres import SRES

# SRES has built-in constraint handling
algorithm = SRES()

See: references/constraints_mcdm.md for comprehensive constraint handling guide

Workflow 6: Decision Making from Pareto Front

When: Have Pareto front, need to select preferred solution(s)

Steps:

  1. Run multi-objective optimization
  2. Normalize objectives to [0, 1]
  3. Define preference weights
  4. Apply MCDM method
  5. Visualize selected solution

Example using Pseudo-Weights:

from pymoo.mcdm.pseudo_weights import PseudoWeights
import numpy as np

# After obtaining result from multi-objective optimization
# Normalize objectives
F_norm = (result.F - result.F.min(axis=0)) / (result.F.max(axis=0) - result.F.min(axis=0))

# Define preferences (must sum to 1)
weights = np.array([0.3, 0.7])  # 30% f1, 70% f2

# Apply decision making
dm = PseudoWeights(weights)
selected_idx = dm.do(F_norm)

# Get selected solution
best_solution = result.X[selected_idx]
best_objectives = result.F[selected_idx]

print(f"Selected solution: {best_solution}")
print(f"Objective values: {best_objectives}")

Other MCDM methods:

  • Compromise Programming: Select closest to ideal point
  • Knee Point: Find balanced trade-off solutions
  • Hypervolume Contribution: Select most diverse subset

See:

  • scripts/decision_making_example.py for complete example
  • references/constraints_mcdm.md for detailed MCDM methods

Workflow 7: Visualization

Choose visualization based on number of objectives:

2 objectives: Scatter Plot

from pymoo.visualization.scatter import Scatter

plot = Scatter(title="Bi-objective Results")
plot.add(result.F, color="blue", alpha=0.7)
plot.show()

3 objectives: 3D Scatter

plot = Scatter(title="Tri-objective Results")
plot.add(result.F)  # Automatically renders in 3D
plot.show()

4+ objectives: Parallel Coordinate Plot

from pymoo.visualization.pcp import PCP

plot = PCP(
    labels=[f"f{i+1}" for i in range(n_obj)],
    normalize_each_axis=True
)
plot.add(result.F, alpha=0.3)
plot.show()

Solution comparison: Petal Diagram

from pymoo.visualization.petal import Petal

plot = Petal(
    bounds=[result.F.min(axis=0), result.F.max(axis=0)],
    labels=["Cost", "Weight", "Efficiency"]
)
plot.add(solution_A, label="Design A")
plot.add(solution_B, label="Design B")
plot.show()

See: references/visualization.md for all visualization types and usage

Workflow 8: Parallel Evaluation

When: Each _evaluate call is expensive (simulations, ML models, external solvers)

Approach: Pass an elementwise_runner to ElementwiseProblem using StarmapParallelization or JoblibParallelization.

Example (thread pool):

from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.core.problem import ElementwiseProblem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.parallelization.starmap import StarmapParallelization

class MyProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
    def __init__(self, elementwise_runner=None, **kwargs):
        super().__init__(
            n_var=10, n_obj=1, xl=-5, xu=5,
            elementwise_runner=elementwise_runner, **kwargs,
        )

    def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
        out["F"] = (x ** 2).sum()  # Replace with expensive evaluation

pool = ThreadPool(4)
runner = StarmapParallelization(pool.starmap)
problem = MyProblem(elementwise_runner=runner)

result = minimize(problem, GA(), ("n_gen", 50), seed=1)
pool.close()

See: references/parallelization.md for process pools, joblib, and pickling notes

Workflow 9: Mixed-Variable Optimization

When: Decision variables include continuous, integer, binary, and/or categorical types

Approach: Define a vars dict with typed variables; use MixedVariableGA (SOO) or add MOO survival.

Example:

from pymoo.core.problem import ElementwiseProblem
from pymoo.core.variable import Real, Integer, Choice, Binary
from pymoo.core.mixed import MixedVariableGA
from pymoo.optimize import minimize

class MixedProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
    def __init__(self, **kwargs):
        vars = {
            "b": Binary(),
            "x": Choice(options=["nothing", "multiply"]),
            "y": Integer(bounds=(0, 2)),
            "z": Real(bounds=(0, 5)),
        }
        super().__init__(vars=vars, n_obj=1, **kwargs)

    def _evaluate(self, X, out, *args, **kwargs):
        b, x, z, y = X["b"], X["x"], X["z"], X["y"]
        f = z + y
        if b:
            f = 100 * f
        if x == "multiply":
            f = 10 * f
        out["F"] = f

algorithm = MixedVariableGA(pop_size=20)
result = minimize(MixedProblem(), algorithm, ("n_evals", 1000), seed=1)

For multi-objective mixed-variable problems, use MixedVariableGA(pop_size=20, survival=RankAndCrowdingSurvival()). For single-objective mixed search, pymoo also wraps Optuna via pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.optuna.Optuna.

See: references/algorithms.md for MixedVariableGA and Optuna details

Algorithm Selection Guide

Single-Objective Problems

AlgorithmBest ForKey Features
GAGeneral-purposeFlexible, customizable operators
DEContinuous optimizationGood global search
PSOSmooth landscapesFast convergence
CMA-ESDifficult/noisy problemsSelf-adapting

Multi-Objective Problems (2-3 objectives)

AlgorithmBest ForKey Features
NSGA-IIStandard benchmarkFast, reliable, well-tested
SPEA2Archive-based MOOStrength-based fitness, external archive
R-NSGA-IIPreference regionsReference point guidance
MOEA/DDecomposable problemsScalarization approach

Many-Objective Problems (4+ objectives)

AlgorithmBest ForKey Features
NSGA-III4-15 objectivesReference direction-based
RVEAAdaptive searchReference vector evolution
AGE-MOEAComplex landscapesAdaptive geometry

Constrained Problems

ApproachAlgorithmWhen to Use
Feasibility-firstAny algorithmLarge feasible region
SpecializedSRES, ISRESHeavy constraints
PenaltyGA + penaltyAlgorithm compatibility

See: references/algorithms.md for comprehensive algorithm reference

Benchmark Problems

Quick problem access:

from pymoo.problems import get_problem

# Single-objective
problem = get_problem("rastrigin", n_var=10)
problem = get_problem("rosenbrock", n_var=10)

# Multi-objective
problem = get_problem("zdt1")        # Convex front
problem = get_problem("zdt2")        # Non-convex front
problem = get_problem("zdt3")        # Disconnected front

# Many-objective
problem = get_problem("dtlz2", n_obj=5, n_var=12)
problem = get_problem("dtlz7", n_obj=4)

See: references/problems.md for complete test problem reference

Genetic Operator Customization

Standard operator configuration:

from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.operators.crossover.sbx import SBX
from pymoo.operators.mutation.pm import PM

algorithm = GA(
    pop_size=100,
    crossover=SBX(prob=0.9, eta=15),
    mutation=PM(eta=20),
    eliminate_duplicates=True
)

Operator selection by variable type:

Continuous variables:

  • Crossover: SBX (Simulated Binary Crossover)
  • Mutation: PM (Polynomial Mutation)

Binary variables:

  • Crossover: TwoPointCrossover, UniformCrossover
  • Mutation: BitflipMutation

Permutations (TSP, scheduling):

  • Crossover: OrderCrossover (OX)
  • Mutation: InversionMutation

See: references/operators.md for comprehensive operator reference

Performance and Troubleshooting

Common issues and solutions:

Problem: Algorithm not converging

  • Increase population size
  • Increase number of generations
  • Check if problem is multimodal (try different algorithms)
  • Verify constraints are correctly formulated

Problem: Poor Pareto front distribution

  • For NSGA-III: Adjust reference directions
  • Increase population size
  • Check for duplicate elimination
  • Verify problem scaling

Problem: Few feasible solutions

  • Use constraint-as-objective approach
  • Apply repair operators
  • Try SRES/ISRES for constrained problems
  • Check constraint formulation (should be g <= 0)

Problem: High computational cost

  • Reduce population size
  • Decrease number of generations
  • Use simpler operators
  • Enable parallel evaluation via elementwise_runner (see Workflow 8)

Best practices:

  1. Normalize objectives when scales differ significantly
  2. Set random seed for reproducibility
  3. Save history to analyze convergence: save_history=True
  4. Visualize results to understand solution quality
  5. Compare with true Pareto front when available
  6. Use appropriate termination criteria (generations, evaluations, tolerance)
  7. Tune operator parameters for problem characteristics

Resources

This skill includes comprehensive reference documentation and executable examples:

references/

Detailed documentation for in-depth understanding:

  • algorithms.md: Complete algorithm reference with parameters, usage, and selection guidelines
  • problems.md: Benchmark test problems (ZDT, DTLZ, WFG) with characteristics
  • operators.md: Genetic operators (sampling, selection, crossover, mutation) with configuration
  • visualization.md: All visualization types with examples and selection guide
  • constraints_mcdm.md: Constraint handling techniques and multi-criteria decision making methods
  • parallelization.md: Parallel evaluation with StarmapParallelization and JoblibParallelization

Search patterns for references:

  • Algorithm details: grep -r "NSGA-II\|NSGA-III\|MOEA/D" references/
  • Constraint methods: grep -r "Feasibility First\|Penalty\|Repair" references/
  • Visualization types: grep -r "Scatter\|PCP\|Petal" references/

scripts/

Executable examples demonstrating common workflows:

  • single_objective_example.py: Basic single-objective optimization with GA
  • multi_objective_example.py: Multi-objective optimization with NSGA-II, visualization
  • many_objective_example.py: Many-objective optimization with NSGA-III, reference directions
  • custom_problem_example.py: Defining custom problems (constrained and unconstrained)
  • decision_making_example.py: Multi-criteria decision making with different preferences

Run examples:

python3 scripts/single_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/multi_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/many_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/custom_problem_example.py
python3 scripts/decision_making_example.py

Additional Notes

Common patterns:

  • Use ElementwiseProblem for custom problems (or FunctionalProblem for function-based definitions)
  • Use vars dict with typed variables for mixed-variable problems
  • Constraints formulated as g(x) <= 0 and h(x) = 0
  • Reference directions required for NSGA-III
  • Normalize objectives before MCDM
  • Use appropriate termination: ('n_gen', N) or get_termination("f_tol", tol=0.001)
how to use pymoo

How to use pymoo on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add pymoo
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill pymoo

The skills CLI fetches pymoo from GitHub repository K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/pymoo

Reload or restart Cursor to activate pymoo. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /pymoo) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.659 reviews
  • Pratham Ware· Dec 28, 2024

    We added pymoo from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Meera Nasser· Dec 28, 2024

    Useful defaults in pymoo — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Meera Farah· Dec 20, 2024

    pymoo is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Noor Garcia· Dec 16, 2024

    pymoo fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 4, 2024

    I recommend pymoo for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 23, 2024

    Useful defaults in pymoo — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Charlotte Abebe· Nov 19, 2024

    I recommend pymoo for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Noor Johnson· Nov 11, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: pymoo is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Aisha Martinez· Nov 11, 2024

    Keeps context tight: pymoo is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Kabir Haddad· Nov 7, 2024

    Registry listing for pymoo matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 59

1 / 6