Milestone Review
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example: Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example: Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example: Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Time estimate: 15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Prerequisites
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill milestone-reviewCompatible with
Supported agents
name: milestone-review
description: "Generates a comprehensive milestone progress review including feature completeness, quality metrics, risk assessment, and go/no-go recommendation. Use at milestone checkpoints or when ev
argument-hint: "[milestone-name|current] [--review full|lean|solo]"
| name | milestone-review |
| description | "Generates a comprehensive milestone progress review including feature completeness, quality metrics, risk assessment, and go/no-go recommendation. Use at milestone checkpoints or when evaluating readiness for a milestone deadline." |
| argument-hint | "[milestone-name|current] [--review full|lean|solo]" |
| user-invocable | true |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Task, AskUserQuestion |
Extract the milestone name (current or a specific name) and resolve the review mode (once, store for all gate spawns this run):
--review [full|lean|solo] was passed → use thatproduction/review-mode.txt → use that valueleanSee .claude/docs/director-gates.md for the full check pattern.
Read the milestone definition from production/milestones/. If the argument is current, use the most recently modified milestone file.
Read all sprint reports for sprints within this milestone from production/sprints/.
TODO, FIXME, HACK markers that indicate incomplete workproduction/risk-register/# Milestone Review: [Milestone Name]
## Overview
- **Target Date**: [Date]
- **Current Date**: [Today]
- **Days Remaining**: [N]
- **Sprints Completed**: [X/Y]
## Feature Completeness
### Fully Complete
| Feature | Acceptance Criteria | Test Status |
|---------|-------------------|-------------|
### Partially Complete
| Feature | % Done | Remaining Work | Risk to Milestone |
|---------|--------|---------------|------------------|
### Not Started
| Feature | Priority | Can Cut? | Impact of Cutting |
|---------|----------|----------|------------------|
## Quality Metrics
- **Open S1 Bugs**: [N] -- [List]
- **Open S2 Bugs**: [N]
- **Open S3 Bugs**: [N]
- **Test Coverage**: [X%]
- **Performance**: [Within budget? Details]
## Code Health
- **TODO count**: [N across codebase]
- **FIXME count**: [N]
- **HACK count**: [N]
- **Technical debt items**: [List critical ones]
## Risk Assessment
| Risk | Status | Impact if Realized | Mitigation Status |
|------|--------|-------------------|------------------|
## Velocity Analysis
- **Planned vs Completed** (across all sprints): [X/Y tasks = Z%]
- **Trend**: [Improving / Stable / Declining]
- **Adjusted estimate for remaining work**: [Days needed at current velocity]
## Scope Recommendations
### Protect (Must ship with milestone)
- [Feature and why]
### At Risk (May need to cut or simplify)
- [Feature and risk]
### Cut Candidates (Can defer without compromising milestone)
- [Feature and impact of cutting]
## Go/No-Go Assessment
**Recommendation**: [GO / CONDITIONAL GO / NO-GO]
**Conditions** (if conditional):
- [Condition 1 that must be met]
- [Condition 2 that must be met]
**Rationale**: [Explanation of the recommendation]
## Action Items
| # | Action | Owner | Deadline |
|---|--------|-------|----------|
Review mode check — apply before spawning PR-MILESTONE:
solo → skip. Note: "PR-MILESTONE skipped — Solo mode." Present the Go/No-Go section without a producer verdict.lean → skip (not a PHASE-GATE). Note: "PR-MILESTONE skipped — Lean mode." Present the Go/No-Go section without a producer verdict.full → spawn as normal.Before generating the Go/No-Go recommendation, spawn producer via Task using gate PR-MILESTONE (.claude/docs/director-gates.md).
Pass: milestone name and target date, current completion percentage, blocked story count, velocity data from sprint reports (if available), list of cut candidates.
Present the producer's assessment inline within the Go/No-Go section. The producer's verdict (ON TRACK / AT RISK / OFF TRACK) informs the overall recommendation — do not issue a GO against an OFF TRACK producer verdict without explicit user acknowledgement.
Present the review to the user.
Ask: "May I write this to production/milestones/[milestone-name]-review.md?"
If yes, write the file, creating the directory if needed. Verdict: COMPLETE — milestone review saved.
If no, stop here. Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined write.
/gate-check for a formal phase gate verdict if this milestone marks a development phase boundary./sprint-plan to adjust the next sprint based on the scope recommendations above.AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionmilestone-reviewExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill milestone-reviewFetches milestone-review from Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/milestone-review
Restart Cursor to activate milestone-review. Access via /milestone-reviewin your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
code-review
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios · Game Dev Code · same repo
start
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios · Game Dev Planning · same repo
propagate-design-change
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios · Game Design · same repo
prototype
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios · Game Dev Skills · same repo
soak-test
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios · Game QA & Testing · same repo
brand-voice-guide
whyashthakker/agent-skills-marketing · Marketing · 2 shared tags
Useful defaults in milestone-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: milestone-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
milestone-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
milestone-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
milestone-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Registry listing for milestone-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
We added milestone-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
milestone-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added milestone-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
milestone-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 57