Comprehensive smart contract testing with Hardhat and Foundry, supporting unit tests, integration tests, mainnet forking, and gas optimization.
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example: Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example: Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example: Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Time estimate: 15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Prerequisites
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add wshobson/agents --skill web3-testingCompatible with
Supported agents
Supports both Hardhat (JavaScript/TypeScript) and Foundry (Solidity) testing frameworks with fixtures, cheatcodes, and assertion libraries
Includes mainnet forking capabilities for realistic testing against live contract state, account impersonation, and time manipulation
Covers gas optimization testing, fuzzing for edge cases, snapshot/rever
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionweb3-testingExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add wshobson/agents --skill web3-testingFetches web3-testing from wshobson/agents and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/web3-testing
Restart Cursor to activate web3-testing. Access via /web3-testingin your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
architecture-patterns
wshobson/agents · Productivity · same repo
react-native-architecture
wshobson/agents · Frontend · same repo
tailwind-design-system
wshobson/agents · Frontend · same repo
embedding-strategies
wshobson/agents · AI/ML · same repo
python-error-handling
wshobson/agents · Backend · same repo
airflow-dag-patterns
wshobson/agents · AI/ML · same repo
web3-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
web3-testing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
web3-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: web3-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for web3-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
I recommend web3-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
web3-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Useful defaults in web3-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
web3-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
web3-testing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 36