track-management▌
wshobson/agents · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Organize and manage Conductor tracks—logical work units for features, bugs, and refactors.
- ›Provides track lifecycle management from creation through completion, including specification (spec.md), planning (plan.md), and status tracking via tracks.md registry
- ›Supports four track types: feature, bug, chore, and refactor, each with distinct use cases and conventions
- ›Includes structured templates for specifications with functional/non-functional requirements, acceptance criteria, scope b
Track Management
Guide for creating, managing, and completing Conductor tracks - the logical work units that organize features, bugs, and refactors through specification, planning, and implementation phases.
When to Use This Skill
- Creating new feature, bug, or refactor tracks
- Writing or reviewing spec.md files
- Creating or updating plan.md files
- Managing track lifecycle from creation to completion
- Understanding track status markers and conventions
- Working with the tracks.md registry
- Interpreting or updating track metadata
Track Concept
A track is a logical work unit that encapsulates a complete piece of work. Each track has:
- A unique identifier
- A specification defining requirements
- A phased plan breaking work into tasks
- Metadata tracking status and progress
Tracks provide semantic organization for work, enabling:
- Clear scope boundaries
- Progress tracking
- Git-aware operations (revert by track)
- Team coordination
Track Types
feature
New functionality or capabilities. Use for:
- New user-facing features
- New API endpoints
- New integrations
- Significant enhancements
bug
Defect fixes. Use for:
- Incorrect behavior
- Error conditions
- Performance regressions
- Security vulnerabilities
chore
Maintenance and housekeeping. Use for:
- Dependency updates
- Configuration changes
- Documentation updates
- Cleanup tasks
refactor
Code improvement without behavior change. Use for:
- Code restructuring
- Pattern adoption
- Technical debt reduction
- Performance optimization (same behavior, better performance)
Track ID Format
Track IDs follow the pattern: {shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}
- shortname: 2-4 word kebab-case description (e.g.,
user-auth,api-rate-limit) - YYYYMMDD: Creation date in ISO format
Examples:
user-auth_20250115fix-login-error_20250115upgrade-deps_20250115refactor-api-client_20250115
Track Lifecycle
1. Creation (newTrack)
Define Requirements
- Gather requirements through interactive Q&A
- Identify acceptance criteria
- Determine scope boundaries
- Identify dependencies
Generate Specification
- Create
spec.mdwith structured requirements - Document functional and non-functional requirements
- Define acceptance criteria
- List dependencies and constraints
Generate Plan
- Create
plan.mdwith phased task breakdown - Organize tasks into logical phases
- Add verification tasks after phases
- Estimate effort and complexity
Register Track
- Add entry to
tracks.mdregistry - Create track directory structure
- Generate
metadata.json - Create track
index.md
2. Implementation
Execute Tasks
- Select next pending task from plan
- Mark task as in-progress
- Implement following workflow (TDD)
- Mark task complete with commit SHA
Update Status
- Update task markers in plan.md
- Record commit SHAs for traceability
- Update phase progress
- Update track status in tracks.md
Verify Progress
- Complete verification tasks
- Wait for checkpoint approval
- Record checkpoint commits
3. Completion
Sync Documentation
- Update product.md if features added
- Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed
- Verify all acceptance criteria met
Archive or Delete
- Mark track as completed in tracks.md
- Record completion date
- Archive or retain track directory
Specification (spec.md) Structure
# {Track Title}
## Overview
Brief description of what this track accomplishes and why.
## Functional Requirements
### FR-1: {Requirement Name}
Description of the functional requirement.
- Acceptance: How to verify this requirement is met
### FR-2: {Requirement Name}
...
## Non-Functional Requirements
### NFR-1: {Requirement Name}
Description of the non-functional requirement (performance, security, etc.)
- Target: Specific measurable target
- Verification: How to test
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Criterion 1: Specific, testable condition
- [ ] Criterion 2: Specific, testable condition
- [ ] Criterion 3: Specific, testable condition
## Scope
### In Scope
- Explicitly included items
- Features to implement
- Components to modify
### Out of Scope
- Explicitly excluded items
- Future considerations
- Related but separate work
## Dependencies
### Internal
- Other tracks or components this depends on
- Required context artifacts
### External
- Third-party services or APIs
- External dependencies
## Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
| ---------------- | --------------- | ------------------- |
| Risk description | High/Medium/Low | Mitigation strategy |
## Open Questions
- [ ] Question that needs resolution
- [x] Resolved question - Answer
Plan (plan.md) Structure
# Implementation Plan: {Track Title}
Track ID: `{track-id}`
Created: YYYY-MM-DD
Status: pending | in-progress | completed
## Overview
Brief description of implementation approach.
## Phase 1: {Phase Name}
### Tasks
- [ ] **Task 1.1**: Task description
- Sub-task or detail
- Sub-task or detail
- [ ] **Task 1.2**: Task description
- [ ] **Task 1.3**: Task description
### Verification
- [ ] **Verify 1.1**: Verification step for phase
## Phase 2: {Phase Name}
### Tasks
- [ ] **Task 2.1**: Task description
- [ ] **Task 2.2**: Task description
### Verification
- [ ] **Verify 2.1**: Verification step for phase
## Phase 3: Finalization
### Tasks
- [ ] **Task 3.1**: Update documentation
- [ ] **Task 3.2**: Final integration test
### Verification
- [ ] **Verify 3.1**: All acceptance criteria met
## Checkpoints
| Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status |
| ------- | -------------- | ---- | ------- |
| Phase 1 | | | pending |
| Phase 2 | | | pending |
| Phase 3 | | | pending |
Status Marker Conventions
Use consistent markers in plan.md:
| Marker | Meaning | Usage |
|---|---|---|
[ ] |
Pending | Task not started |
[~] |
In Progress | Currently being worked |
[x] |
Complete | Task finished (include SHA) |
[-] |
Skipped | Intentionally not done |
[!] |
Blocked | Waiting on dependency |
Example:
- [x] **Task 1.1**: Set up database schema `abc1234`
- [~] **Task 1.2**: Implement user model
- [ ] **Task 1.3**: Add validation logic
- [!] **Task 1.4**: Integrate auth service (blocked: waiting for API key)
- [-] **Task 1.5**: Legacy migration (skipped: not needed)
Track Registry (tracks.md) Format
# Track Registry
## Active Tracks
| Track ID | Type | Status | Phase | Started | Assignee |
| ------------------------------------------------ | ------- | ----------- | ----- | ---------- | ---------- |
| [user-auth_20250115](tracks/user-auth_202How to use track-management on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add track-management
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches track-management from GitHub repository wshobson/agents and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate track-management. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /track-management) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★51 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024
We added track-management from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Daniel Malhotra· Dec 12, 2024
Useful defaults in track-management — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Harper Mensah· Dec 8, 2024
track-management fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Zaid Thompson· Dec 8, 2024
track-management is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Amina Agarwal· Dec 4, 2024
track-management reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Amelia Robinson· Nov 27, 2024
I recommend track-management for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Chen Agarwal· Nov 27, 2024
Keeps context tight: track-management is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Amelia Martinez· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for track-management matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024
track-management reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Valentina Singh· Nov 7, 2024
Useful defaults in track-management — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 51