multi-cloud-architecture▌
wshobson/agents · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Decision framework and service comparison patterns for architecting across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI.
- ›Includes detailed service mapping tables across compute, storage, and database categories to identify equivalent offerings and best-of-breed selections
- ›Four core multi-cloud patterns: single provider with disaster recovery, best-of-breed service selection, geographic distribution, and cloud-agnostic abstraction layers
- ›Cloud-agnostic alternatives using Kubernetes, PostgreSQL, Apache Ka
Multi-Cloud Architecture
Decision framework and patterns for architecting applications across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI.
Purpose
Design cloud-agnostic architectures and make informed decisions about service selection across cloud providers.
When to Use
- Design multi-cloud strategies
- Migrate between cloud providers
- Select cloud services for specific workloads
- Implement cloud-agnostic architectures
- Optimize costs across providers
Cloud Service Comparison
Compute Services
| AWS | Azure | GCP | OCI | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC2 | Virtual Machines | Compute Engine | Compute | IaaS VMs |
| ECS | Container Instances | Cloud Run | Container Instances | Containers |
| EKS | AKS | GKE | OKE | Kubernetes |
| Lambda | Functions | Cloud Functions | Functions | Serverless |
| Fargate | Container Apps | Cloud Run | Container Instances | Managed containers |
Storage Services
| AWS | Azure | GCP | OCI | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S3 | Blob Storage | Cloud Storage | Object Storage | Object storage |
| EBS | Managed Disks | Persistent Disk | Block Volumes | Block storage |
| EFS | Azure Files | Filestore | File Storage | File storage |
| Glacier | Archive Storage | Archive Storage | Archive Storage | Cold storage |
Database Services
| AWS | Azure | GCP | OCI | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDS | SQL Database | Cloud SQL | MySQL HeatWave | Managed SQL |
| DynamoDB | Cosmos DB | Firestore | NoSQL Database | NoSQL |
| Aurora | PostgreSQL/MySQL | Cloud Spanner | Autonomous Database | Distributed SQL |
| ElastiCache | Cache for Redis | Memorystore | OCI Cache | Caching |
Reference: See references/service-comparison.md for complete comparison
Multi-Cloud Patterns
Pattern 1: Single Provider with DR
- Primary workload in one cloud
- Disaster recovery in another
- Database replication across clouds
- Automated failover
Pattern 2: Best-of-Breed
- Use best service from each provider
- AI/ML on GCP
- Enterprise apps on Azure
- Regulated data platforms on OCI
- General compute on AWS
Pattern 3: Geographic Distribution
- Serve users from nearest cloud region
- Data sovereignty compliance
- Global load balancing
- Regional failover
Pattern 4: Cloud-Agnostic Abstraction
- Kubernetes for compute
- PostgreSQL for database
- S3-compatible storage (MinIO)
- Open source tools
Cloud-Agnostic Architecture
Use Cloud-Native Alternatives
- Compute: Kubernetes (EKS/AKS/GKE/OKE)
- Database: PostgreSQL/MySQL (RDS/SQL Database/Cloud SQL/MySQL HeatWave)
- Message Queue: Apache Kafka or managed streaming (MSK/Event Hubs/Confluent/OCI Streaming)
- Cache: Redis (ElastiCache/Azure Cache/Memorystore/OCI Cache)
- Object Storage: S3-compatible API
- Monitoring: Prometheus/Grafana
- Service Mesh: Istio/Linkerd
Abstraction Layers
Application Layer
↓
Infrastructure Abstraction (Terraform)
↓
Cloud Provider APIs
↓
AWS / Azure / GCP / OCI
Cost Comparison
Compute Pricing Factors
- AWS: On-demand, Reserved, Spot, Savings Plans
- Azure: Pay-as-you-go, Reserved, Spot
- GCP: On-demand, Committed use, Preemptible
- OCI: Pay-as-you-go, annual commitments, burstable/flexible shapes, preemptible instances
Cost Optimization Strategies
- Use reserved/committed capacity (30-70% savings)
- Leverage spot/preemptible instances
- Right-size resources
- Use serverless for variable workloads
- Optimize data transfer costs
- Implement lifecycle policies
- Use cost allocation tags
- Monitor with cloud cost tools
Reference: See references/multi-cloud-patterns.md
Migration Strategy
Phase 1: Assessment
- Inventory current infrastructure
- Identify dependencies
- Assess cloud compatibility
- Estimate costs
Phase 2: Pilot
- Select pilot workload
- Implement in target cloud
- Test thoroughly
- Document learnings
Phase 3: Migration
- Migrate workloads incrementally
- Maintain dual-run period
- Monitor performance
- Validate functionality
Phase 4: Optimization
- Right-size resources
- Implement cloud-native services
- Optimize costs
- Enhance security
Best Practices
- Use infrastructure as code (Terraform/OpenTofu)
- Implement CI/CD pipelines for deployments
- Design for failure across clouds
- Use managed services when possible
- Implement comprehensive monitoring
- Automate cost optimization
- Follow security best practices
- Document cloud-specific configurations
- Test disaster recovery procedures
- Train teams on multiple clouds
Related Skills
terraform-module-library- For IaC implementationcost-optimization- For cost managementhybrid-cloud-networking- For connectivity
How to use multi-cloud-architecture on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add multi-cloud-architecture
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches multi-cloud-architecture from GitHub repository wshobson/agents and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate multi-cloud-architecture. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /multi-cloud-architecture) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★41 reviews- ★★★★★Arya Reddy· Dec 16, 2024
Useful defaults in multi-cloud-architecture — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Naina Gonzalez· Dec 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: multi-cloud-architecture is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend multi-cloud-architecture for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in multi-cloud-architecture — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Arjun Martinez· Nov 7, 2024
I recommend multi-cloud-architecture for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Arya Taylor· Nov 3, 2024
Keeps context tight: multi-cloud-architecture is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Neel Zhang· Nov 3, 2024
multi-cloud-architecture is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Daniel Johnson· Oct 26, 2024
multi-cloud-architecture reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Amina Agarwal· Oct 22, 2024
Registry listing for multi-cloud-architecture matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Neel Khan· Oct 22, 2024
multi-cloud-architecture fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 41