wp-phpstan▌
wordpress/agent-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
PHPStan configuration, error fixing, and baseline management for WordPress projects.
- ›Handles WordPress-specific typing patterns: REST endpoints with WP_REST_Request , hook callbacks with accurate @param types, database results, and Action Scheduler job arguments
- ›Manages third-party plugin/theme class resolution via stubs ( php-stubs/woocommerce-stubs , php-stubs/acf-pro-stubs ) and targeted ignore patterns
- ›Provides deterministic PHPStan discovery, configuration validation, baseline g
WP PHPStan
When to use
Use this skill when working on PHPStan in a WordPress codebase, for example:
- setting up or updating
phpstan.neon/phpstan.neon.dist - generating or updating
phpstan-baseline.neon - fixing PHPStan errors via WordPress-friendly PHPDoc (REST requests, hooks, query results)
- handling third-party plugin/theme classes safely (stubs/autoload/targeted ignores)
Inputs required
wp-project-triageoutput (run first if you haven't)- Whether adding/updating Composer dev dependencies is allowed (stubs).
- Whether changing the baseline is allowed for this task.
Procedure
0) Discover PHPStan entrypoints (deterministic)
- Inspect PHPStan setup (config, baseline, scripts):
node skills/wp-phpstan/scripts/phpstan_inspect.mjs
Prefer the repo’s existing composer script (e.g. composer run phpstan) when present.
1) Ensure WordPress core stubs are loaded
szepeviktor/phpstan-wordpress or php-stubs/wordpress-stubs are effectively required for most WordPress plugin/theme repos. Without it, expect a high volume of errors about unknown WordPress core functions.
- Confirm the package is installed (see
composer.dependenciesin the inspect report). - Ensure the PHPStan config references the stubs (see
references/third-party-classes.md).
2) Ensure a sane phpstan.neon for WordPress projects
- Keep
pathsfocused on first-party code (plugin/theme directories). - Exclude generated and vendored code (
vendor/,node_modules/, build artifacts, tests unless explicitly analyzed). - Keep
ignoreErrorsentries narrow and documented.
See:
references/configuration.md
3) Fix errors with WordPress-specific typing (preferred)
Prefer correcting types over ignoring errors. Common WP patterns that need help:
- REST endpoints: type request parameters using
WP_REST_Request<...> - Hook callbacks: add accurate
@paramtypes for callback args - Database results and iterables: use array shapes or object shapes for query results
- Action Scheduler: type
$argsarray shapes for job callbacks
See:
references/wordpress-annotations.md
4) Handle third-party plugin/theme classes (only when needed)
When integrating with plugins/themes not present in the analysis environment:
- First, confirm the dependency is real (installed/required).
- Prefer plugin-specific stubs already used in the repo (common examples:
php-stubs/woocommerce-stubs,php-stubs/acf-pro-stubs). - If PHPStan still cannot resolve classes, add targeted
ignoreErrorspatterns for the specific vendor prefix.
See:
references/third-party-classes.md
5) Baseline management (use as a migration tool, not a trash bin)
- Generate a baseline once for legacy code, then reduce it over time.
- Do not “baseline” newly introduced errors.
See:
references/configuration.md
Verification
- Run PHPStan using the discovered command (
composer run ...orvendor/bin/phpstan analyse). - Confirm the baseline file (if used) is included and didn’t grow unexpectedly.
- Re-run after changing
ignoreErrorsto ensure patterns are not masking unrelated issues.
Failure modes / debugging
- “Class not found”:
- confirm autoloading/stubs, or add a narrow ignore pattern
- Huge error counts after enabling PHPStan:
- reduce
paths, addexcludePaths, start at a lower level, then ratchet up
- reduce
- Inconsistent types around hooks / REST params:
- add explicit PHPDoc (see references) rather than runtime guards
Escalation
- If a type depends on a third-party plugin API you can’t confirm, ask for the dependency version or source before inventing types.
- If fixing requires adding new Composer dependencies (stubs/extensions), confirm it with the user first.
How to use wp-phpstan on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add wp-phpstan
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches wp-phpstan from GitHub repository wordpress/agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate wp-phpstan. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /wp-phpstan) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★53 reviews- ★★★★★Fatima Brown· Dec 28, 2024
wp-phpstan is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Anika Sharma· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for wp-phpstan matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Arya Nasser· Dec 12, 2024
wp-phpstan reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Mei Zhang· Nov 23, 2024
wp-phpstan fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Wang· Nov 19, 2024
wp-phpstan reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Luis Kim· Nov 19, 2024
We added wp-phpstan from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Li Ramirez· Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: wp-phpstan is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Mei Farah· Nov 3, 2024
Registry listing for wp-phpstan matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Zara Taylor· Nov 3, 2024
wp-phpstan is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Li Abbas· Oct 26, 2024
wp-phpstan is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 53