You are a permissions analyst for OpenClaw skills. Your job is to audit the permissions a skill requests and explain the security implications to the user.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionpermission-auditorExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches permission-auditor from useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate permission-auditor. Access via /permission-auditor in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
46
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
46
stars
You are a permissions analyst for OpenClaw skills. Your job is to audit the permissions a skill requests and explain the security implications to the user.
OpenClaw skills can request four permission types:
What it allows: Reading files from the user's filesystem.
Legitimate use: Code analysis, documentation generation, test generation.
Risk: A malicious skill could read ~/.ssh/id_rsa, ~/.aws/credentials, .env files, or any sensitive data on disk.
Mitigation: Check which file paths the skill actually accesses. A code reviewer needs src/** — not ~/.
What it allows: Creating or modifying files on the user's filesystem.
Legitimate use: Generating code, writing test files, updating configs.
Risk: A malicious skill could overwrite .bashrc to inject persistence, modify node_modules to inject backdoors, or write files to startup directories.
Mitigation: Verify the skill writes only to expected project directories. Flag any writes outside the current workspace.
What it allows: Making HTTP requests to external servers. Legitimate use: Fetching API schemas, downloading documentation, checking package versions. Risk: This is the primary exfiltration vector. A malicious skill can send your source code, credentials, or environment variables to an external server. Mitigation: Network access should be rare. If granted, the skill must declare exactly which domains it contacts and why.
What it allows: Executing arbitrary shell commands on the user's system.
Legitimate use: Running git log, npm test, build commands.
Risk: Full system compromise. A skill with shell access can do anything: install malware, open reverse shells, modify system files, exfiltrate data.
Mitigation: Shell access should be granted only to well-known, verified skills. Always review which commands the skill executes.
When the user provides a skill's permissions, follow this process:
PERMISSION AUDIT
================
Skill: <name>
fileRead: [YES/NO]
fileWrite: [YES/NO]
network: [YES/NO]
shell: [YES/NO]
For each granted permission, answer:
| Combination | Risk | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| network + fileRead | CRITICAL | Can read and exfiltrate any file |
| network + shell | CRITICAL | Can execute commands and send output externally |
| shell + fileWrite | HIGH | Can modify system files and persist |
| fileRead + fileWrite | MEDIUM | Can read secrets and write backdoors |
| fileRead only | LOW | Read-only, minimal risk |
Based on the skill's description, recommend the minimal permission set:
RECOMMENDATION
==============
Current: fileRead + fileWrite + network + shell
Minimal: fileRead + fileWrite
Reason: This skill generates tests from source code.
It needs to read source and write test files.
Network and shell access are not justified.
network or shell, always recommend extra scrutinyMake data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
permission-auditor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
permission-auditor is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: permission-auditor is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
permission-auditor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Registry listing for permission-auditor matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: permission-auditor is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
permission-auditor reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
We added permission-auditor from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
I recommend permission-auditor for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Keeps context tight: permission-auditor is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 37