v4-security-foundations

uniswap/uniswap-ai · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/uniswap/uniswap-ai --skill v4-security-foundations
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Security-first guide for building Uniswap v4 hooks. Hook vulnerabilities can drain user funds—understand these concepts before writing any hook code.

skill.md

v4 Hook Security Foundations

Security-first guide for building Uniswap v4 hooks. Hook vulnerabilities can drain user funds—understand these concepts before writing any hook code.

Threat Model

Before writing code, understand the v4 security context:

Threat Area Description Mitigation
Caller Verification Only PoolManager should invoke hook functions Verify msg.sender == address(poolManager)
Sender Identity msg.sender always equals PoolManager, never the end user Use sender parameter for user identity
Router Context The sender parameter identifies the router, not the user Implement router allowlisting
State Exposure Hook state is readable during mid-transaction execution Avoid storing sensitive data on-chain
Reentrancy Surface External calls from hooks can enable reentrancy Use reentrancy guards; minimize external calls

Permission Flags Risk Matrix

All 14 hook permissions with associated risk levels:

Permission Flag Risk Level Description Security Notes
beforeInitialize LOW Called before pool creation Validate pool parameters
afterInitialize LOW Called after pool creation Safe for state initialization
beforeAddLiquidity MEDIUM Before LP deposits Can block legitimate LPs
afterAddLiquidity LOW After LP deposits Safe for tracking/rewards
beforeRemoveLiquidity HIGH Before LP withdrawals Can trap user funds
afterRemoveLiquidity LOW After LP withdrawals Safe for tracking
beforeSwap HIGH Before swap execution Can manipulate prices
afterSwap MEDIUM After swap execution Can observe final state
beforeDonate LOW Before donations Access control only
afterDonate LOW After donations Safe for tracking
beforeSwapReturnDelta CRITICAL Returns custom swap amounts NoOp attack vector
afterSwapReturnDelta HIGH Modifies post-swap amounts Can extract value
afterAddLiquidityReturnDelta HIGH Modifies LP token amounts Can shortchange LPs
afterRemoveLiquidityReturnDelta HIGH Modifies withdrawal amounts Can steal funds

Risk Thresholds

  • LOW: Unlikely to cause fund loss
  • MEDIUM: Requires careful implementation
  • HIGH: Can cause fund loss if misimplemented
  • CRITICAL: Can enable complete fund theft

CRITICAL: NoOp Rug Pull Attack

The BEFORE_SWAP_RETURNS_DELTA permission (bit 10) is the most dangerous hook permission. A malicious hook can:

  1. Return a delta claiming it handled the entire swap
  2. PoolManager accepts this and settles the trade
  3. Hook keeps all input tokens without providing output
  4. User loses entire swap amount

Attack Pattern

// MALICIOUS - DO NOT USE
function beforeSwap(
    address,
    PoolKey calldata,
    IPoolManager.SwapParams calldata params,
    bytes calldata
) external override returns (bytes4, BeforeSwapDelta, uint24) {
    // Claim to handle the swap but steal tokens
    int128 amountSpecified = int128(params.amountSpecified);
    BeforeSwapDelta delta = toBeforeSwapDelta(amountSpecified, 0);
    return (BaseHook.beforeSwap.selector, delta, 0);
}

Detection

Before interacting with ANY hook that has beforeSwapReturnDelta: true:

  1. Audit the hook code - Verify legitimate use case
  2. Check ownership - Is it upgradeable? By whom?
  3. Verify track record - Has it been audited by reputable firms?
  4. Start small - Test with minimal amounts first

Legitimate Uses

NoOp patterns are valid for:

  • Just-in-time liquidity (JIT)
  • Custom AMM curves
  • Intent-based trading systems
  • RFQ/PMM integrations

But each requires careful implementation and audit.

Delta Accounting Fundamentals

v4 uses a credit/debit system through the PoolManager:

Core Invariant

For every transaction: sum(deltas) == 0

The PoolManager tracks what each address owes or is owed. At transaction end, all debts must be settled.

Key Functions

Function Purpose Direction
take(currency, to, amount) Withdraw tokens from PoolManager You receive tokens
settle(currency) Pay tokens to PoolManager You send tokens
sync(currency) Update PoolManager balance tracking Preparation for settle

Settlement Pattern

// Correct pattern: sync before settle
poolManager.sync(currency);
currency.transfer(address(poolManager), amount);
poolManager.settle(currency);

Common Mistakes

  1. Forgetting sync: Settlement fails without sync
  2. Wrong order: Must sync → transfer → settle
  3. Partial settlement: Leaves transaction in invalid state
  4. Double settlement: Causes accounting errors

Access Control Patterns

PoolManager Verification

Every hook callback MUST verify the caller:

modifier onlyPoolManager() {
    require(msg.sender == address(poolManager), "Not PoolManager");
    _;
}

function beforeSwap(
    address sender,
    PoolKey calldata key,
    IPoolManager.SwapParams calldata params,
    bytes calldata hookData
) external override onlyPoolManager returns (bytes4, BeforeSwapDelta, uint24) {
    // Safe to proceed
}

Why This Matters

Without this check:

  • Anyone can call hook functions directly
  • Attackers can manipulate hook state
  • Funds can be drained through fake callbacks

Router Verification Patterns

The sender parameter is the router, not the end user. For hooks that need user identity:

Allowlisting Pattern

mapping(address => bool) public allowedRouters;

function beforeSwap(
    address sender,  // This is the router
    PoolKey calldata key,
    IPoolManager.SwapParams calldata params,
    bytes calldata hookData
) external override onlyPoolManager returns (bytes4, BeforeSwapDelta, uint24) {
    require(allowedRouters[sender], "Router not allowed");
    // Proceed with swap
}

User Identity via hookData

function beforeSwap(
    address sender,
    PoolKey calldata key,
    IPoolManager.SwapParams calldata params,
    bytes calldata hookData
) external override onlyPoolManager returns (bytes4, BeforeSwapDelta, uint24) {
    // Decode user address from hookData (router must include it)
    address user = abi.decode(hookData, (address));
    // CAUTION: Router must be trusted to provide accurate user
}

msg.sender Trap

// WRONG - msg.sender is always PoolManager in hooks
function beforeSwap(...) external {
    require(msg.sender == someUser); // Always fails or wrong
}

// CORRECT - Use sender parameter
function beforeSwap(address sender, ...) external {
    require(allowedRouters[sender], "Invalid router");
}

Token Handling Hazards

Not all tokens behave like standard ERC-20s:

Token Type Hazard Mitigation
Fee-on-transfer Received amount < sent amount Measure actual balance changes
Rebasing Balance changes without transfers Avoid storing raw balances
ERC-777 Transfer callbacks enable reentrancy Use reentrancy guards
Pausable Transfers can be blocked Handle transfer failures gracefully
Blocklist Specific addresses blocked Test with production addresses
Low decimals Precision loss in calculations Use appropriate scaling

Safe Balance Check Pattern

function safeTransferIn(
    IERC20 token,
    address from,
    uint256 amount
) internal returns (uint256 received) {
    uint256 balanceBefore = token.balanceOf(address(this));
    token.safeTransferFrom(from, address(this), amount);
    received = token.balanceOf(address(this)) - balanceBefore;
}

Base Hook Template

Start with all permissions disabled. Enable only what you need:

// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.24;

import {BaseHook} from "v4-periphery/src/base/hooks/BaseHook.sol";
import {Hooks
how to use v4-security-foundations

How to use v4-security-foundations on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add v4-security-foundations
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/uniswap/uniswap-ai --skill v4-security-foundations

The skills CLI fetches v4-security-foundations from GitHub repository uniswap/uniswap-ai and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/v4-security-foundations

Reload or restart Cursor to activate v4-security-foundations. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /v4-security-foundations) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.750 reviews
  • Harper White· Dec 24, 2024

    Keeps context tight: v4-security-foundations is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Henry Li· Dec 20, 2024

    Registry listing for v4-security-foundations matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Hassan Anderson· Dec 8, 2024

    I recommend v4-security-foundations for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Harper Rahman· Dec 4, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: v4-security-foundations is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Isabella Agarwal· Nov 27, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: v4-security-foundations is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Diya Torres· Nov 23, 2024

    I recommend v4-security-foundations for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Isabella Sethi· Nov 15, 2024

    v4-security-foundations is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Meera Huang· Nov 11, 2024

    v4-security-foundations reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 3, 2024

    v4-security-foundations fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Oct 22, 2024

    v4-security-foundations has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 50

1 / 5