pair-trade-screener▌
tradermonty/claude-trading-skills · updated Apr 29, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
This skill identifies and analyzes statistical arbitrage opportunities through pair trading. Pair trading is a market-neutral strategy that profits from the relative price movements of two correlated securities, regardless of overall market direction. The skill uses rigorous statistical methods including correlation analysis and cointegration testing to find robust trading pairs.
Pair Trade Screener
Overview
This skill identifies and analyzes statistical arbitrage opportunities through pair trading. Pair trading is a market-neutral strategy that profits from the relative price movements of two correlated securities, regardless of overall market direction. The skill uses rigorous statistical methods including correlation analysis and cointegration testing to find robust trading pairs.
Core Methodology:
- Identify pairs of stocks with high correlation and similar sector/industry exposure
- Test for cointegration (long-term statistical relationship)
- Calculate spread z-scores to identify mean-reversion opportunities
- Generate entry/exit signals based on statistical thresholds
- Provide position sizing for market-neutral exposure
Key Advantages:
- Market-neutral: Profits in up, down, or sideways markets
- Risk management: Limited exposure to broad market movements
- Statistical foundation: Data-driven, not discretionary
- Diversification: Uncorrelated to traditional long-only strategies
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- User asks for "pair trading opportunities"
- User wants "market-neutral strategies"
- User requests "statistical arbitrage screening"
- User asks "which stocks move together?"
- User wants to hedge sector exposure
- User requests mean-reversion trade ideas
- User asks about relative value trading
Example user requests:
- "Find pair trading opportunities in the tech sector"
- "Which stocks are cointegrated?"
- "Screen for statistical arbitrage opportunities"
- "Find mean-reversion pairs"
- "What are good market-neutral trades right now?"
Analysis Workflow
Step 1: Define Pair Universe
Objective: Establish the pool of stocks to analyze for pair relationships.
Option A: Sector-Based Screening (Recommended)
Select a specific sector to screen:
- Technology
- Financials
- Healthcare
- Consumer Discretionary
- Industrials
- Energy
- Materials
- Consumer Staples
- Utilities
- Real Estate
- Communication Services
Option B: Custom Stock List
User provides specific tickers to analyze:
Example: ["AAPL", "MSFT", "GOOGL", "META", "NVDA"]
Option C: Industry-Specific
Narrow focus to specific industry within sector:
- Example: "Software" within Technology sector
- Example: "Regional Banks" within Financials
Filtering Criteria:
- Minimum market cap: $2B (mid-cap and above)
- Minimum average volume: 1M shares/day (liquidity requirement)
- Active trading: No delisted or inactive stocks
- Same exchange preference: Avoid cross-exchange complications
Step 2: Retrieve Historical Price Data
Objective: Fetch price history for correlation and cointegration analysis.
Data Requirements:
- Timeframe: 2 years (minimum 252 trading days)
- Frequency: Daily closing prices
- Adjustments: Adjusted for splits and dividends
- Clean data: No gaps or missing values
FMP API Endpoint:
GET /v3/historical-price-full/{symbol}?apikey=YOUR_API_KEY
Data Validation:
- Verify consistent date ranges across all symbols
- Remove stocks with >10% missing data
- Fill minor gaps with forward-fill method
- Log data quality issues
Script Execution:
python scripts/fetch_price_data.py --sector Technology --lookback 730
Step 3: Calculate Correlation and Beta
Objective: Identify candidate pairs with strong linear relationships.
Correlation Analysis:
For each pair of stocks (i, j) in the universe:
- Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ)
- Calculate rolling correlation (90-day window) for stability check
- Filter pairs with ρ >= 0.70 (strong positive correlation)
Correlation Interpretation:
- ρ >= 0.90: Very strong correlation (best candidates)
- ρ 0.70-0.90: Strong correlation (good candidates)
- ρ 0.50-0.70: Moderate correlation (marginal)
- ρ < 0.50: Weak correlation (exclude)
Beta Calculation:
For each candidate pair (Stock A, Stock B):
Beta = Covariance(A, B) / Variance(B)
Beta indicates the hedge ratio:
- Beta = 1.0: Equal dollar amounts
- Beta = 1.5: $1.50 of B for every $1.00 of A
- Beta = 0.8: $0.80 of B for every $1.00 of A
Correlation Stability Check:
- Calculate correlation over multiple periods (6mo, 1yr, 2yr)
- Require correlation to be stable (not deteriorating)
- Flag pairs where recent correlation < historical correlation by >0.15
Step 4: Cointegration Testing
Objective: Statistically validate long-term equilibrium relationship.
Why Cointegration Matters:
- Correlation measures short-term co-movement
- Cointegration proves long-term equilibrium relationship
- Cointegrated pairs mean-revert predictably
- Non-cointegrated pairs may diverge permanently
Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) Test:
For each correlated pair:
- Calculate spread:
Spread = Price_A - (Beta × Price_B) - Run ADF test on spread series
- Check p-value: p < 0.05 indicates cointegration (reject null hypothesis of unit root)
- Extract ADF statistic for strength ranking
Cointegration Interpretation:
- p-value < 0.01: Very strong cointegration (★★★)
- p-value 0.01-0.05: Moderate cointegration (★★)
- p-value > 0.05: No cointegration (exclude)
Half-Life Calculation:
Estimate mean-reversion speed:
Half-Life = -log(2) / log(mean_reversion_coefficient)
- Half-life < 30 days: Fast mean-reversion (good for short-term trading)
- Half-life 30-60 days: Moderate speed (standard)
- Half-life > 60 days: Slow mean-reversion (long holding periods)
Python Implementation:
from statsmodels.tsa.stattools import adfuller
# Calculate spread
spread = price_a - (beta * price_b)
# ADF test
result = adfuller(spread)
adf_stat = result[0]
p_value = result[1]
# Interpret
is_cointegrated = p_value < 0.05
Step 5: Spread Analysis and Z-Score Calculation
Objective: Quantify current spread deviation from equilibrium.
Spread Calculation:
Two common methods:
Method 1: Price Difference (Additive)
Spread = Price_A - (Beta × Price_B)
Best for: Stocks with similar price levels
Method 2: Price Ratio (Multiplicative)
Spread = Price_A / Price_B
Best for: Stocks with different price levels, easier interpretation
Z-Score Calculation:
Measures how many standard deviations spread is from its mean:
Z-Score = (Current_Spread - Mean_Spread) / Std_Dev_Spread
Z-Score Interpretation:
- Z > +2.0: Stock A expensive relative to B (short A, long B)
- Z > +1.5: Moderately expensive (watch for entry)
- Z -1.5 to +1.5: Normal range (no trade)
- Z < -1.5: Moderately cheap (watch for entry)
- Z < -2.0: Stock A cheap relative to B (long A, short B)
Historical Spread Analysis:
- Calculate mean and std dev over 90-day rolling window
- Plot historical z-score distribution
- Identify maximum historical z-score deviations
- Check for structural breaks (spread regime change)
Step 6: Generate Entry/Exit Recommendations
Objective: Provide actionable trading signals with clear rules.
Entry Conditions:
Conservative Approach (Z ≥ ±2.0):
LONG Signal:
- Z-score < -2.0 (spread 2+ std devs below mean)
- Spread is mean-reverting (cointegration p < 0.05)
- Half-life < 60 days
→ Action: Buy Stock A, Short Stock B (hedge ratio = beta)
SHORT Signal:
- Z-score > +2.0 (spread 2+ std devs above mean)
- Spread is mean-reverting (cointegration p < 0.05)
- Half-life < 60 days
→ Action: Short Stock A, Buy Stock B (hedge ratio = beta)
Aggressive Approach (Z ≥ ±1.5):
- Lower threshold for more frequent trades
- Higher win rate but smaller avg profit per trade
- Requires tighter risk management
Exit Conditions:
Primary Exit: Mean Reversion (Z = 0)
Exit when spread returns to mean (z-score crosses 0)
→ Close both legs simultaneously
Secondary Exit: Partial Profit Take
Exit 50% when z-score reaches ±1.0
Exit remaining 50% at z-score = 0
Stop Loss:
Exit if z-score extends beyond ±3.0 (extreme divergence)
Risk: Possible structural break in relationship
Time-Based Exit:
Exit after 90 days if no mean-reversion
Prevents holding broken pairs indefinitely
Step 7: Position Sizing and Risk Management
Objective: Determine dollar amounts for market-neutral exposure.
Market Neutral Sizing:
For a pair (Stock A, Stock B) with beta = β:
Equal Dollar Exposure:
If portfolio size = $10,000 allocated to this pair:
- Long $5,000 of Stock A
- Short $5,000 × β of Stock B
Example (β = 1.2):
- Long $5,000 Stock A
- Short $6,000 Stock B
→ Market neutral, beta = 0
Position Sizing Considerations:
- Total pair allocation: 10-20% of portfolio per pair
- Maximum pairs: 5-8 active pairs for diversification
- Correlation across pairs: Avoid highly correlated pairs
Risk Metrics:
- Maximum loss per pair: 2-3% of total portfolio
- Stop loss trigger: Z-score > ±3.0 or -5% loss on spread
- Portfolio-level risk: Sum of all pair risks ≤ 10%
Step 8: Generate Pair Analysis Report
Objective: Create structured markdown report with findings and recommendations.
Report Sections:
-
Executive Summary
- Total pairs analyzed
- Number of cointegrated pairs found
- Top 5 opportunities ranked by statistical strength
-
Cointegrated Pairs Table
- Pair name (Stock A / Stock B)
- Correlation coefficient
- Cointegration p-value
- Current z-score
- Trade signal (Long/Short/None)
- Half-life
-
Detailed Analysis (Top 10 Pairs)
- Pair description
- Statistical metrics
- Current spread position
- Entry/exit recommendations
- Position sizing
- Risk assessment
-
Spread Charts (Text-Based)
- Historical z-score plot (ASCII art)
- Entry/exit levels marked
- Current position indicator
-
Risk Warnings
- Pairs with deteriorating correlation
- Structural breaks detected
- Low liquidity warnings
File Naming Convention:
pair_trade_analysis_[SECTOR]_[YYYY-MM-DD].md
Example: pair_trade_analysis_Technology_2025-11-08.md
Quality Standards
Statistical Rigor
Minimum Requirements for Valid Pair:
- ✓ Correlation ≥ 0.70 over 2-year period
- ✓ Cointegration p-value < 0.05 (ADF test)
- ✓ Spread stationarity confirmed
- ✓ Half-life < 90 days
- ✓ No structural breaks in recent 6 months
Red Flags (Exclude Pair):
- Correlation dropped >0.20 in recent 6 months
- Cointegration p-value > 0.05
- Half-life increasing over time (mean-reversion weakening)
- Significant corporate events (merger, spin-off, bankruptcy risk)
- Liquidity concerns (avg volume < 500K shares/day)
Practical Considerations
Transaction Costs:
- Assume 0.1% round-trip cost per leg
- Total cost per pair = 0.4% (entry + exit, both legs)
- Minimum z-score threshold should exceed transaction costs
Short Selling:
- Verify stock is shortable (not hard-to-borrow)
- Factor in short interest costs (borrow fees)
- Monitor short squeeze risk
Execution:
- Enter/exit both legs simultaneously (avoid leg risk)
- Use limit orders to control slippage
- Pre-locate shorts before entry
Available Scripts
scripts/find_pairs.py
Purpose: Screen for cointegrated pairs within a sector or custom list.
Usage:
# Sector-based screening
python scripts/find_pairs.py --sector Technology --min-correlation 0.70
# Custom stock list
python scripts/find_pairs.py --symbols AAPL,MSFT,GOOGL,META --min-correlation 0.75
# Full options
python scripts/find_pairs.py \
--sector Financials \
--min-correlation 0.70 \
--min-market-cap 2000000000 \
--lookback-days 730 \
--output pairs_analysis.json
Parameters:
--sector: Sector name (Technology, Financials, etc.)--symbols: Comma-separated list of tickers (alternative to sector)--min-correlation: Minimum correlation threshold (default: 0.70)--min-market-cap: Minimum market cap filter (default: $2B)--lookback-days: Historical data period (default: 730 days)--output: Output JSON file (default: stdout)--api-key: FMP API key (or set FMP_API_KEY env var)
Output:
[
{
"pair": "AAPL/MSFT",
"stock_a": "AAPL",
"stock_b": "MSFT",
"correlation": 0.87,
"beta": 1.15,
"cointegration_pvalue": 0.012,
"adf_statistic": -3.45,
"half_life_days": 42,
"current_zscore": -2.3,
"signal": "LONG",
"strength": "Strong"
}
]
scripts/analyze_spread.py
Purpose: Analyze a specific pair's spread behavior and generate trading signals.
Usage:
# Analyze specific pair
python scripts/analyze_spread.py --stock-a AAPL --stock-b MSFT
# Custom lookback period
python scripts/analyze_spread.py \
--stock-a JPM \
--stock-b BAC \
--lookback-days 365 \
--entry-zscore 2.0 \
--exit-zscore 0.5
Parameters:
--stock-a: First stock ticker--stock-b: Second stock ticker--lookback-days: Analysis period (default: 365)--entry-zscore: Z-score threshold for entry (default: 2.0)--exit-zscore: Z-score threshold for exit (default: 0.0)--api-key: FMP API key
How to use pair-trade-screener on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add pair-trade-screener
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches pair-trade-screener from GitHub repository tradermonty/claude-trading-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate pair-trade-screener. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /pair-trade-screener) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★42 reviews- ★★★★★Tariq Jain· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for pair-trade-screener matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Aditi Park· Dec 20, 2024
Keeps context tight: pair-trade-screener is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Soo Ghosh· Nov 19, 2024
Useful defaults in pair-trade-screener — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Zara Reddy· Oct 10, 2024
I recommend pair-trade-screener for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Sep 25, 2024
pair-trade-screener is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Sep 17, 2024
Registry listing for pair-trade-screener matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Jackson· Sep 9, 2024
pair-trade-screener fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ishan Malhotra· Sep 1, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: pair-trade-screener is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Ndlovu· Aug 28, 2024
We added pair-trade-screener from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Ishan Johnson· Aug 20, 2024
pair-trade-screener has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 42