domain-identification-grouping▌
tech-leads-club/agent-skills · updated May 23, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Groups existing components into logical business domains to plan service-based architecture. Use when asking "which components belong together?", "group these into services", "organize by domain", "component-to-domain mapping", or planning service extraction from an existing codebase. Do NOT use for identifying new domains from scratch (use domain-analysis) or analyzing coupling (use coupling-analysis).
| name | domain-identification-grouping |
| description | Groups existing components into logical business domains to plan service-based architecture. Use when asking "which components belong together?", "group these into services", "organize by domain", "component-to-domain mapping", or planning service extraction from an existing codebase. Do NOT use for identifying new domains from scratch (use domain-analysis) or analyzing coupling (use coupling-analysis). |
Domain Identification and Grouping
This skill groups architectural components into logical domains (business areas) to prepare for creating domain services in a service-based architecture.
How to Use
Quick Start
Request analysis of your codebase:
- "Group components into logical domains"
- "Identify component domains for service-based architecture"
- "Create domain groupings from components"
- "Analyze which components belong to which domains"
Usage Examples
Example 1: Domain Identification
User: "Group components into logical domains"
The skill will:
1. Analyze component responsibilities and relationships
2. Identify business domains based on functionality
3. Group components into domains
4. Create domain diagrams
5. Suggest namespace refactoring for domain alignment
Example 2: Domain Analysis
User: "Which domain should the billing components belong to?"
The skill will:
1. Analyze billing component functionality
2. Check relationships with other components
3. Identify appropriate domain (e.g., Customer or Financial)
4. Recommend domain assignment
Example 3: Domain Refactoring
User: "What namespace refactoring is needed to align components with domains?"
The skill will:
1. Compare current component namespaces to identified domains
2. Identify misaligned components
3. Suggest namespace changes
4. Create refactoring plan
Step-by-Step Process
- Identify Domains: Analyze business capabilities and component relationships
- Group Components: Assign components to appropriate domains
- Validate Groupings: Ensure components fit well in their domains
- Refactor Namespaces: Align component namespaces with domains
- Create Domain Map: Visualize domain structure and component groupings
When to Use
Apply this skill when:
- After identifying, sizing, and analyzing component dependencies
- Before creating domain services (Pattern 6)
- When planning service-based architecture migration
- Analyzing component relationships and business alignment
- Preparing for domain-driven design implementation
- Grouping components for better organization
Core Concepts
Domain Definition
A domain is a logical grouping of components that:
- Represents a distinct business capability or area
- Contains related components that work together
- Has clear boundaries and responsibilities
- Can become a domain service in service-based architecture
Examples:
- Customer Domain: Customer profile, billing, support contracts
- Ticketing Domain: Ticket creation, assignment, routing, completion
- Reporting Domain: Ticket reports, expert reports, financial reports
Component Domain Relationship
One-to-Many: A single domain contains multiple components
Domain: Customer
├── Component: Customer Profile
├── Component: Billing Payment
├── Component: Billing History
└── Component: Support Contract
Domain Manifestation
Domains are physically manifested through namespace structure:
Before Domain Alignment:
services/billing/payment
services/billing/history
services/customer/profile
services/supportcontract
After Domain Alignment:
services/customer/billing/payment
services/customer/billing/history
services/customer/profile
services/customer/supportcontract
Notice how all customer-related functionality is grouped under .customer domain.
Analysis Process
Phase 1: Identify Business Domains
Analyze the codebase to identify distinct business domains:
-
Examine Component Responsibilities
- Read component names and descriptions
- Understand what each component does
- Identify business capabilities
-
Look for Business Language
- Group components by business vocabulary
- Example: "billing", "payment", "invoice" → Financial domain
- Example: "customer", "profile", "contract" → Customer domain
-
Identify Domain Boundaries
- Where do business concepts change?
- What are the distinct business areas?
- How do components relate to business capabilities?
-
Collaborate with Business Stakeholders
- Validate domain identification with product owners
- Ensure domains align with business understanding
- Get feedback on domain boundaries
Example Domain Identification:
## Identified Domains
1. **Ticketing Domain** (ss.ticket)
- Ticket creation, assignment, routing, completion
- Customer surveys
- Knowledge base
2. **Customer Domain** (ss.customer)
- Customer profile
- Billing and payment
- Support contracts
3. **Reporting Domain** (ss.reporting)
- Ticket reports
- Expert reports
- Financial reports
4. **Admin Domain** (ss.admin)
- User maintenance
- Expert profile management
5. **Shared Domain** (ss.shared)
- Login
- Notification
Phase 2: Group Components into Domains
Assign each component to an appropriate domain:
-
Analyze Component Functionality
- What business capability does it support?
- What domain vocabulary does it use?
- What other components does it relate to?
-
Check Component Relationships
- Which components are frequently used together?
- What are the dependencies between components?
- Do components share data or workflows?
-
Assign to Domain
- Place component in domain that best fits its functionality
- Ensure component aligns with domain's business language
- Verify component relationships support domain grouping
-
Handle Edge Cases
- Components that don't fit clearly: Analyze more deeply
- Components that fit multiple domains: Choose primary domain
- Shared components: May belong to Shared domain
Example Component Grouping:
## Component Domain Assignment
### Ticketing Domain (ss.ticket)
- Ticket Shared (ss.ticket.shared)
- Ticket Maintenance (ss.ticket.maintenance)
- Ticket Completion (ss.ticket.completion)
- Ticket Assign (ss.ticket.assign)
- Ticket Route (ss.ticket.route)
- KB Maintenance (ss.ticket.kb.maintenance)
- KB Search (ss.ticket.kb.search)
- Survey (ss.ticket.survey)
### Customer Domain (ss.customer)
- Customer Profile (ss.customer.profile)
- Billing Payment (ss.customer.billing.payment)
- Billing History (ss.customer.billing.history)
- Support Contract (ss.customer.supportcontract)
### Reporting Domain (ss.reporting)
- Reporting Shared (ss.reporting.shared)
- Ticket Reports (ss.reporting.tickets)
- Expert Reports (ss.reporting.experts)
- Financial Reports (ss.reporting.financial)
Phase 3: Validate Domain Groupings
Ensure components fit well in their assigned domains:
-
Check Cohesion
- Do components in domain share business language?
- Are components frequently used together?
- Do components have direct relationships?
-
Verify Boundaries
- Are domain boundaries clear?
- Do components belong to only one domain?
- Are there components that don't fit anywhere?
-
Assess Completeness
- Are all components assigned to a domain?
- Are domains cohesive and well-formed?
- Do domains represent distinct business capabilities?
-
Get Stakeholder Validation
- Review domain groupings with product owners
- Ensure domains align with business understanding
- Get feedback on domain boundaries
Validation Checklist:
- All components assigned to a domain
- Domains have clear boundaries
- Components fit well in their domains
- Domains represent distinct business capabilities
- Stakeholders validate domain groupings
Phase 4: Refactor Namespaces for Domain Alignment
Align component namespaces with identified domains:
-
Compare Current vs Target Namespaces
- Current:
services/billing/payment - Target:
services/customer/billing/payment - Change: Add
.customerdomain node
- Current:
-
Identify Refactoring Needed
- Which components need namespace changes?
- What domain nodes need to be added?
- Are there components already aligned?
-
Create Refactoring Plan
- List components needing namespace changes
- Specify target namespace for each
- Prioritize refactoring work
-
Execute Refactoring
- Update component namespaces
- Update imports/references
- Verify all references updated
Example Namespace Refactoring:
## Namespace Refactoring Plan
### Customer Domain Alignment
| Component | Current Namespace | Target Namespace | Action |
| ---------------- | ------------------- | --------------------------- | ------------- |
| Billing Payment | ss.billing.payment | ss.customer.billing.payment | Add .customer |
| Billing History | ss.billing.history | ss.customer.billing.history | Add .customer |
| Customer Profile | ss.customer.profile | ss.customer.profile | No change |
| Support Contract | ss.supportcontract | ss.customer.supportcontract | Add .customer |
### Ticketing Domain Alignment
| Component | Current Namespace | Target Namespace | Action |
| -------------- | ----------------- | ------------------------ | ----------- |
| KB Maintenance | ss.kb.maintenance | ss.ticket.kb.maintenance | Add .ticket |
| KB Search | ss.kb.search | ss.ticket.kb.search | Add .ticket |
| Survey | ss.survey | ss.ticket.survey | Add .ticket |
Phase 5: Create Domain Map
Visualize domain structure and component groupings:
-
Create Domain Diagram
- Show domains as boxes
- Show components within each domain
- Show relationships between domains
-
Document Domain Structure
- List domains and their components
- Describe domain responsibilities
- Note domain boundaries
-
Create Domain Inventory
- Table of domains and components
- Component counts per domain
- Size metrics per domain
Example Domain Map:
## Domain Map
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Ticketing Domain (ss.ticket) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ • Ticket Shared │ │ • Ticket Maintenance │ │ • Ticket Completion │ │ • Ticket Assign │ │ • Ticket Route │ │ • KB Maintenance │ │ • KB Search │ │ • Survey │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ uses ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Customer Domain (ss.customer) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ • Customer Profile │ │ • Billing Payment │ │ • Billing History │ │ • Support Contract │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘
## Output Format
### Domain Identification Report
```markdown
## Domain Identification
### Domain: Customer (ss.customer)
**Business Capability**: Manages customer relationships, billing, and support contracts
**Components**:
- Customer Profile (ss.customer.profile)
- Billing Payment (ss.customer.billing.payment)
- Billing History (ss.customer.billing.history)
- Support Contract (ss.customer.supportcontract)
**Component Count**: 4
**Total Size**: ~15,000 statements (18% of codebase)
**Domain Cohesion**: ✅ High
- Components share customer-related vocabulary
- Components frequently used together
- Direct relationships between components
**Boundaries**:
- Clear separation from Ticketing domain
- Clear separation from Reporting domain
- Shared components (Notification) used by all domains
Component Domain Assignment Table
## Component Domain Assignment
| Component | Current Namespace | Assigned Domain | Target Namespace |
| ------------------ | --------------------- | --------------- | --------------------------------- |
| Customer Profile | ss.customer.profile | Customer | ss.customer.profile (no change) |
| Billing Payment | ss.billing.payment | Customer | ss.customer.billing.payment |
| Ticket Maintenance | ss.ticket.maintenance | Ticketing | ss.ticket.maintenance (no change) |
| KB Maintenance | ss.kb.maintenance | Ticketing | ss.ticket.kb.maintenance |
| Reporting Shared | ss.reporting.shared | Reporting | ss.reporting.shared (no change) |
Namespace Refactoring Plan
## Namespace Refactoring Plan
### Priority: High
**Customer Domain Alignment**
**Components to Refactor**:
1. Billing Payment: `ss.billing.payment` → `ss.customer.billing.payment`
2. Billing History: `ss.billing.history` → `ss.customer.billing.history`
3. Support Contract: `ss.supportcontract` → `ss.customer.supportcontract`
**Steps**:
1. Update namespace declarations in source files
2. Update import statements in dependent components
3. Update directory structure
4. Run tests to verify changes
5. Update documentation
**Expected Impact**:
- All customer-related components aligned under `.customer` domain
- Clearer domain boundaries
- Easier to identify domain components
Domain Map Visualization
## Domain Map
### Domain Structure
Customer Domain (ss.customer) ├── Customer Profile ├── Billing Payment ├── Billing History └── Support Contract
Ticketing Domain (ss.ticket) ├── Ticket Shared ├── Ticket Maintenance ├── Ticket Completion ├── Ticket Assign ├── Ticket Route ├── KB Maintenance ├── KB Search └── Survey
Reporting Domain (ss.reporting) ├── Reporting Shared ├── Ticket Reports ├── Expert Reports └── Financial Reports
Admin Domain (ss.admin) ├── User Maintenance └── Expert Profile
Shared Domain (ss.shared) ├── Login └── Notification
### Domain Relationships
Ticketing Domain │ uses ├─→ Shared Domain (Login, Notification) └─→ Customer Domain (Customer Profile)
Customer Domain │ uses └─→ Shared Domain (Login, Notification)
Reporting Domain │ uses ├─→ Ticketing Domain (Ticket data) ├─→ Customer Domain (Customer data) └─→ Shared Domain (Login)
Analysis Checklist
Domain Identification:
- Analyzed component responsibilities
- Identified business capabilities
- Identified distinct business domains
- Validated domains with stakeholders
Component Grouping:
- Assigned each component to a domain
- Analyzed component relationships
- Ensured components fit domain vocabulary
- Handled edge cases (shared components, unclear assignments)
Domain Validation:
- Checked cohesion within domains
- Verified domain boundaries are clear
- Ensured all components assigned
- Validated with stakeholders
Namespace Refactoring:
- Compared current vs target namespaces
- Identified components needing refactoring
- Created refactoring plan
- Prioritized refactoring work
Domain Mapping:
- Created domain diagram
- Documented domain structure
- Created domain inventory table
- Documented domain relationships
Implementation Notes
For Node.js/Express Applications
Domains typically organized in services/ directory:
services/
├── customer/ ← Customer Domain
│ ├── profile/
│ ├── billing/
│ │ ├── payment/
│ │ └── history/
│ └── supportcontract/
├── ticket/ ← Ticketing Domain
│ ├── shared/
│ ├── maintenance/
│ ├── assign/
│ └── route/
└── reporting/ ← Reporting Domain
├── shared/
├── tickets/
└── experts/
For Java Applications
Domains identified by package structure:
com.company.customer ← Customer Domain
├── profile
├── billing
│ ├── payment
│ └── history
└── supportcontract
com.company.ticket ← Ticketing Domain
├── shared
├── maintenance
├── assign
└── route
Domain Identification Strategies
Strategy 1: Business Capability Analysis
- Identify what business capabilities the system provides
- Group components by capability
- Example: "Customer Management" capability → Customer Domain
Strategy 2: Vocabulary Analysis
- Identify business vocabulary used by components
- Group components sharing same vocabulary
- Example: Components using "billing", "payment", "invoice" → Financial Domain
Strategy 3: Relationship Analysis
- Identify components frequently used together
- Group components with strong relationships
- Example: Components that share data/workflows → Same Domain
Strategy 4: Stakeholder Collaboration
- Work with product owners/business analysts
- Use their understanding of business areas
- Validate domain boundaries with them
Fitness Functions
After creating domains, create automated checks:
Domain Namespace Governance
// Ensure components belong to correct domain
function validateDomainNamespaces(components, domainRules) {
const violations = []
components.forEach((comp) => {
const domain = identifyDomain(comp.namespace)
const expectedDomain = domainRules[comp.name]
if (domain !== expectedDomain) {
violations.push({
component: comp.name,
currentDomain: domain,
expectedDomain: expectedDomain,
namespace: comp.namespace,
})
}
})
return violations
}
Domain Boundary Enforcement
// Prevent components from accessing other domains directly
function enforceDomainBoundaries(components) {
const violations = []
components.forEach((comp) => {
comp.imports.forEach((imp) => {
const importedDomain = identifyDomain(imp)
const componentDomain = identifyDomain(comp.namespace)
if (importedDomain !== componentDomain && importedDomain !== 'shared') {
violations.push({
component: comp.name,
domain: componentDomain,
importsFrom: imp,
importedDomain: importedDomain,
issue: 'Cross-domain direct dependency',
})
}
})
})
return violations
}
Best Practices
Do's ✅
- Collaborate with business stakeholders to identify domains
- Group components by business capability, not technical layers
- Ensure domains represent distinct business areas
- Validate domain boundaries with stakeholders
- Refactor namespaces to align with domains
- Create clear domain documentation
- Use business language in domain names
Don'ts ❌
- Don't create domains based on technical layers (services, controllers, models)
- Don't force components into domains where they don't fit
- Don't skip stakeholder validation
- Don't create too many small domains (aim for 3-7 domains)
- Don't create domains that are too large (monolithic domains)
- Don't ignore components that don't fit (analyze why)
- Don't skip namespace refactoring (critical for clarity)
Common Domain Patterns
Typical Domains in Business Applications
- Customer Domain: Customer management, profiles, relationships
- Product Domain: Product catalog, inventory, pricing
- Order Domain: Order processing, fulfillment, shipping
- Billing Domain: Invoicing, payments, financial transactions
- Reporting Domain: Reports, analytics, dashboards
- Admin Domain: User management, system configuration
- Shared Domain: Common functionality (login, notification, utilities)
Domain Size Guidelines
- Small Domain: 2-4 components
- Medium Domain: 5-8 components
- Large Domain: 9-15 components
- Too Large: >15 components (consider splitting)
Next Steps
After creating component domains:
- Apply Create Domain Services Pattern - Extract domains to separate services
- Plan Service Extraction - Create migration plan for domain services
- Implement Domain Services - Move domains to separately deployed services
- Monitor Domain Boundaries - Use fitness functions to enforce boundaries
Notes
- Domains should represent business capabilities, not technical layers
- Domain identification requires collaboration with business stakeholders
- Namespace refactoring is critical for domain clarity
- Domains prepare the codebase for service-based architecture
- Well-formed domains make service extraction easier
- Domain boundaries should be clear and well-documented
How to use domain-identification-grouping on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add domain-identification-grouping
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches domain-identification-grouping from GitHub repository tech-leads-club/agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate domain-identification-grouping. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /domain-identification-grouping) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★44 reviews- ★★★★★Jin Perez· Dec 28, 2024
We added domain-identification-grouping from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Xiao Mehta· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: domain-identification-grouping is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Maya Liu· Nov 19, 2024
domain-identification-grouping fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Aditi Menon· Nov 11, 2024
Registry listing for domain-identification-grouping matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Fatima Perez· Oct 10, 2024
domain-identification-grouping has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Noor Farah· Oct 2, 2024
Useful defaults in domain-identification-grouping — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Noah Rao· Sep 21, 2024
domain-identification-grouping reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Aisha Singh· Sep 21, 2024
domain-identification-grouping fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ama Mehta· Sep 17, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: domain-identification-grouping is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Sep 13, 2024
domain-identification-grouping fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 44