sprint-retrospective▌
supercent-io/skills-template · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Structured sprint retrospective facilitation with three proven formats and actionable outcome tracking.
- ›Offers three retrospective formats: Start-Stop-Continue, Mad-Sad-Glad, and 4Ls (Liked-Learned-Lacked-Longed For), each suited to different team dynamics and reflection styles
- ›Enforces blame-free discussion, specific action items with owners and due dates, and limits to 2-3 actions per retrospective to ensure follow-through
- ›Includes time-boxing guidance (1 hour), facilitator rotatio
Sprint Retrospective
When to use this skill
- End of sprint: at the end of each sprint
- Project milestone: after major releases
- Team issues: when an immediate retrospective is needed
Instructions
Step 1: Start-Stop-Continue
## Retrospective Template: Start-Stop-Continue
### START (Start doing)
- Make daily standups shorter (within 5 minutes)
- Use a code review checklist
- Introduce pair programming
### STOP (Stop doing)
- Deploying on Friday afternoons (rollback risk)
- Overusing emergency meetings
- Adding features without documentation
### CONTINUE (Keep doing)
- Weekly tech sharing session
- Automated tests
- Transparent communication
### Action Items
1. [ ] Change standup time from 9:00 → 9:30 (Team Lead)
2. [ ] Write a code review checklist document (Developer A)
3. [ ] Announce the "no Friday deployments" rule (Team Lead)
Step 2: Mad-Sad-Glad
## Retrospective: Mad-Sad-Glad
### MAD (What made us mad)
- Urgent bugs after deployment (twice)
- Requirements changed frequently
- Unstable test environment
### SAD (What we wished went better)
- Not enough time for code reviews
- Documentation lagged behind
- Accumulating tech debt
### GLAD (What made us glad)
- New team members onboarded quickly
- CI/CD pipeline stabilized
- Positive customer feedback
### Action Items
- Strengthen the deployment checklist
- Improve the requirements change process
- Reserve documentation time every Friday
Step 3: 4Ls (Liked-Learned-Lacked-Longed For)
## Retrospective: 4Ls
### LIKED (What we liked)
- Great teamwork
- Successfully adopted a new tech stack
### LEARNED (What we learned)
- Standardize the local environment with Docker Compose
- Improve server state management with React Query
### LACKED (What we lacked)
- Performance testing
- Mobile support
### LONGED FOR (What we longed for)
- Better developer tools
- External training opportunities
### Action Items
- Automatically measure performance by introducing Lighthouse CI
- Write responsive design guidelines
Output format
Retrospective document
# Sprint [N] Retrospective
**Date**: 2025-01-15
**Participants**: Team Member A, B, C, D
**Format**: Start-Stop-Continue
## What Went Well
- Completed all stories (Velocity: 25 points)
- 0 bugs
- Great team morale
## What Didn't Go Well
- Tech spike took longer than expected
- Rework due to design changes
## Action Items
1. [ ] Assign tech spikes to a dedicated sprint (Team Lead, ~01/20)
2. [ ] Introduce a pre-review process for designs (Designer, ~01/18)
3. [ ] Share the velocity chart (Scrum Master, weekly)
## Key Metrics
- Velocity: 25 points
- Bugs Found: 0
- Sprint Goal Achievement: 100%
Constraints
Required Rules (MUST)
- Safe Space: a blame-free environment
- Action Items: must be specific and actionable
- Follow-up: check progress in the next retrospective
Prohibited (MUST NOT)
- Personal attacks: improve the process, not the person
- Too many actions: limit to 2-3
Best practices
- Time-box: within 1 hour
- Rotate Facilitator: team members take turns facilitating
- Celebrate Wins: celebrate successes too
References
Metadata
Version
- Current version: 1.0.0
- Last updated: 2025-01-01
- Supported platforms: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini
Tags
#retrospective #agile #scrum #team-improvement #project-management
Examples
Example 1: Basic usage
Example 2: Advanced usage
How to use sprint-retrospective on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add sprint-retrospective
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches sprint-retrospective from GitHub repository supercent-io/skills-template and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate sprint-retrospective. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /sprint-retrospective) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★49 reviews- ★★★★★Ama White· Dec 28, 2024
I recommend sprint-retrospective for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 20, 2024
sprint-retrospective reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Advait Thompson· Dec 12, 2024
sprint-retrospective has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Kaira Ramirez· Dec 8, 2024
Useful defaults in sprint-retrospective — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Chen Haddad· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for sprint-retrospective matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Michael Malhotra· Nov 19, 2024
sprint-retrospective reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 11, 2024
I recommend sprint-retrospective for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Liam Nasser· Nov 3, 2024
sprint-retrospective fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ama Jackson· Oct 22, 2024
We added sprint-retrospective from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Chen· Oct 18, 2024
sprint-retrospective reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 49