sprint-retrospective

supercent-io/skills-template · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/supercent-io/skills-template --skill sprint-retrospective
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Structured sprint retrospective facilitation with three proven formats and actionable outcome tracking.

  • Offers three retrospective formats: Start-Stop-Continue, Mad-Sad-Glad, and 4Ls (Liked-Learned-Lacked-Longed For), each suited to different team dynamics and reflection styles
  • Enforces blame-free discussion, specific action items with owners and due dates, and limits to 2-3 actions per retrospective to ensure follow-through
  • Includes time-boxing guidance (1 hour), facilitator rotatio
skill.md

Sprint Retrospective

When to use this skill

  • End of sprint: at the end of each sprint
  • Project milestone: after major releases
  • Team issues: when an immediate retrospective is needed

Instructions

Step 1: Start-Stop-Continue

## Retrospective Template: Start-Stop-Continue

### START (Start doing)
- Make daily standups shorter (within 5 minutes)
- Use a code review checklist
- Introduce pair programming

### STOP (Stop doing)
- Deploying on Friday afternoons (rollback risk)
- Overusing emergency meetings
- Adding features without documentation

### CONTINUE (Keep doing)
- Weekly tech sharing session
- Automated tests
- Transparent communication

### Action Items
1. [ ] Change standup time from 9:00 → 9:30 (Team Lead)
2. [ ] Write a code review checklist document (Developer A)
3. [ ] Announce the "no Friday deployments" rule (Team Lead)

Step 2: Mad-Sad-Glad

## Retrospective: Mad-Sad-Glad

### MAD (What made us mad)
- Urgent bugs after deployment (twice)
- Requirements changed frequently
- Unstable test environment

### SAD (What we wished went better)
- Not enough time for code reviews
- Documentation lagged behind
- Accumulating tech debt

### GLAD (What made us glad)
- New team members onboarded quickly
- CI/CD pipeline stabilized
- Positive customer feedback

### Action Items
- Strengthen the deployment checklist
- Improve the requirements change process
- Reserve documentation time every Friday

Step 3: 4Ls (Liked-Learned-Lacked-Longed For)

## Retrospective: 4Ls

### LIKED (What we liked)
- Great teamwork
- Successfully adopted a new tech stack

### LEARNED (What we learned)
- Standardize the local environment with Docker Compose
- Improve server state management with React Query

### LACKED (What we lacked)
- Performance testing
- Mobile support

### LONGED FOR (What we longed for)
- Better developer tools
- External training opportunities

### Action Items
- Automatically measure performance by introducing Lighthouse CI
- Write responsive design guidelines

Output format

Retrospective document

# Sprint [N] Retrospective
**Date**: 2025-01-15
**Participants**: Team Member A, B, C, D
**Format**: Start-Stop-Continue

## What Went Well
- Completed all stories (Velocity: 25 points)
- 0 bugs
- Great team morale

## What Didn't Go Well
- Tech spike took longer than expected
- Rework due to design changes

## Action Items
1. [ ] Assign tech spikes to a dedicated sprint (Team Lead, ~01/20)
2. [ ] Introduce a pre-review process for designs (Designer, ~01/18)
3. [ ] Share the velocity chart (Scrum Master, weekly)

## Key Metrics
- Velocity: 25 points
- Bugs Found: 0
- Sprint Goal Achievement: 100%

Constraints

Required Rules (MUST)

  1. Safe Space: a blame-free environment
  2. Action Items: must be specific and actionable
  3. Follow-up: check progress in the next retrospective

Prohibited (MUST NOT)

  1. Personal attacks: improve the process, not the person
  2. Too many actions: limit to 2-3

Best practices

  1. Time-box: within 1 hour
  2. Rotate Facilitator: team members take turns facilitating
  3. Celebrate Wins: celebrate successes too

References

Metadata

Version

  • Current version: 1.0.0
  • Last updated: 2025-01-01
  • Supported platforms: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini

Tags

#retrospective #agile #scrum #team-improvement #project-management

Examples

Example 1: Basic usage

Example 2: Advanced usage

how to use sprint-retrospective

How to use sprint-retrospective on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add sprint-retrospective
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/supercent-io/skills-template --skill sprint-retrospective

The skills CLI fetches sprint-retrospective from GitHub repository supercent-io/skills-template and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/sprint-retrospective

Reload or restart Cursor to activate sprint-retrospective. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /sprint-retrospective) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.749 reviews
  • Ama White· Dec 28, 2024

    I recommend sprint-retrospective for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 20, 2024

    sprint-retrospective reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Advait Thompson· Dec 12, 2024

    sprint-retrospective has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Kaira Ramirez· Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in sprint-retrospective — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Chen Haddad· Nov 27, 2024

    Registry listing for sprint-retrospective matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Michael Malhotra· Nov 19, 2024

    sprint-retrospective reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Piyush G· Nov 11, 2024

    I recommend sprint-retrospective for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Liam Nasser· Nov 3, 2024

    sprint-retrospective fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Ama Jackson· Oct 22, 2024

    We added sprint-retrospective from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Nikhil Chen· Oct 18, 2024

    sprint-retrospective reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 49

1 / 5