debugging▌
supercent-io/skills-template · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Systematically isolate and fix code issues using structured debugging methodologies.
- ›Covers six-step debugging workflow: information gathering, reproduction, isolation, root cause analysis, fix implementation, and verification
- ›Includes common bug patterns (off-by-one, null references, race conditions, memory leaks, type mismatches) with targeted solutions
- ›Provides debugging techniques: binary search isolation, print/log debugging, divide-and-conquer code elimination, and regression t
Debugging
When to use this skill
- Encountering runtime errors or exceptions
- Code produces unexpected output or behavior
- Performance degradation or memory issues
- Intermittent or hard-to-reproduce bugs
- Understanding unfamiliar error messages
- Post-incident analysis and prevention
Instructions
Step 1: Gather Information
Collect all relevant context about the issue:
Error details:
- Full error message and stack trace
- Error type (syntax, runtime, logic, etc.)
- When did it start occurring?
- Is it reproducible?
Environment:
- Language and version
- Framework and dependencies
- OS and runtime environment
- Recent changes to code or config
# Check recent changes
git log --oneline -10
git diff HEAD~5
# Check dependency versions
npm list --depth=0 # Node.js
pip freeze # Python
Step 2: Reproduce the Issue
Create a minimal, reproducible example:
# Bad: Vague description
"The function sometimes fails"
# Good: Specific reproduction steps
"""
1. Call process_data() with input: {"id": None}
2. Error occurs: TypeError at line 45
3. Expected: Return empty dict
4. Actual: Raises exception
"""
# Minimal reproduction
def test_reproduce_bug():
result = process_data({"id": None}) # Fails here
assert result == {}
Step 3: Isolate the Problem
Use binary search debugging to narrow down the issue:
Print/Log debugging:
def problematic_function(data):
print(f"[DEBUG] Input: {data}") # Entry point
result = step_one(data)
print(f"[DEBUG] After step_one: {result}")
result = step_two(result)
print(f"[DEBUG] After step_two: {result}") # Issue here?
return step_three(result)
Divide and conquer:
# Comment out half the code
# If error persists: bug is in remaining half
# If error gone: bug is in commented half
# Repeat until isolated
Step 4: Analyze Root Cause
Common bug patterns and solutions:
| Pattern | Symptom | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Off-by-one | Index out of bounds | Check loop bounds |
| Null reference | NullPointerException | Add null checks |
| Race condition | Intermittent failures | Add synchronization |
| Memory leak | Gradual slowdown | Check resource cleanup |
| Type mismatch | Unexpected behavior | Validate types |
Questions to ask:
- What changed recently?
- Does it fail with specific inputs?
- Is it environment-specific?
- Are there any patterns in failures?
Step 5: Implement Fix
Apply the fix with proper verification:
# Before: Bug
def get_user(user_id):
return users[user_id] # KeyError if not found
# After: Fix with proper handling
def get_user(user_id):
if user_id not in users:
return None # Or raise custom exception
return users[user_id]
Fix checklist:
- Addresses root cause, not just symptom
- Doesn't break existing functionality
- Handles edge cases
- Includes appropriate error handling
- Has test coverage
Step 6: Verify and Prevent
Ensure the fix works and prevent regression:
# Add test for the specific bug
def test_bug_fix_issue_123():
"""Regression test for issue #123: KeyError on missing user"""
result = get_user("nonexistent_id")
assert result is None # Should not raise
# Add edge case tests
@pytest.mark.parametrize("input,expected", [
(None, None),
("", None),
("valid_id", {"name": "User"}),
])
def test_get_user_edge_cases(input, expected):
assert get_user(input) == expected
Examples
Example 1: TypeError debugging
Error:
TypeError: cannot unpack non-iterable NoneType object
File "app.py", line 25, in process
name, email = get_user_info(user_id)
Analysis:
# Problem: get_user_info returns None when user not found
def get_user_info(user_id):
user = db.find_user(user_id)
if user:
return user.name, user.email
# Missing: return None case!
# Fix: Handle None case
def get_user_info(user_id):
user = db.find_user(user_id)
if user:
return user.name, user.email
return None, None # Or raise UserNotFoundError
Example 2: Race condition debugging
Symptom: Test passes locally, fails in CI intermittently
Analysis:
# Problem: Shared state without synchronization
class Counter:
def __init__(self):
self.value = 0
def increment(self):
self.value += 1 # Not atomic!
# Fix: Add thread safety
import threading
class Counter:
def __init__(self):
self.value = 0
self._lock = threading.Lock()
def increment(self):
with self._lock:
self.value += 1
Example 3: Memory leak debugging
Tool: Use memory profiler
from memory_profiler import profile
@profile
def process_large_data():
results = []
for item in large_dataset:
results.append(transform(item)) # Memory grows
return results
# Fix: Use generator for large datasets
def process_large_data():
for item in large_dataset:
yield transform(item) # Memory efficient
Best practices
- Reproduce first: Never fix what you can't reproduce
- One change at a time: Isolate variables when debugging
- Read the error: Error messages usually point to the issue
- Check assumptions: Verify what you think is true
- Use version control: Easy to revert and compare changes
- Document findings: Help future debugging efforts
- Write tests: Prevent regression of fixed bugs
Debugging Tools
| Language | Debugger | Profiler |
|---|---|---|
| Python | pdb, ipdb | cProfile, memory_profiler |
| JavaScript | Chrome DevTools | Performance tab |
| Java | IntelliJ Debugger | JProfiler, VisualVM |
| Go | Delve | pprof |
| Rust | rust-gdb | cargo-flamegraph |
References
How to use debugging on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add debugging
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches debugging from GitHub repository supercent-io/skills-template and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate debugging. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /debugging) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★37 reviews- ★★★★★Liam Rao· Dec 24, 2024
debugging has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Zaid Sanchez· Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in debugging — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Mateo Thompson· Dec 20, 2024
debugging is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Liam Huang· Dec 12, 2024
debugging reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Soo Singh· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend debugging for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Lucas Ramirez· Nov 11, 2024
Keeps context tight: debugging is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Hana Perez· Nov 3, 2024
We added debugging from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Soo Dixit· Oct 22, 2024
Keeps context tight: debugging is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Hana Gonzalez· Oct 6, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: debugging is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Mia Johnson· Oct 2, 2024
We added debugging from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 37