self-improvement

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills --skill self-improvement
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Log learnings and errors to markdown files for continuous improvement. Coding agents can later process these into fixes, and important learnings get promoted to project memory.

skill.md

Self-Improvement Skill

Log learnings and errors to markdown files for continuous improvement. Coding agents can later process these into fixes, and important learnings get promoted to project memory.

Quick Reference

Situation Action
Command/operation fails Log to .learnings/ERRORS.md
User corrects you Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category correction
User wants missing feature Log to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md
API/external tool fails Log to .learnings/ERRORS.md with integration details
Knowledge was outdated Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category knowledge_gap
Found better approach Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category best_practice
Similar to existing entry Link with **See Also**, consider priority bump
Broadly applicable learning Promote to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and/or .github/copilot-instructions.md
Workflow improvements Promote to AGENTS.md (OpenClaw workspace)
Tool gotchas Promote to TOOLS.md (OpenClaw workspace)
Behavioral patterns Promote to SOUL.md (OpenClaw workspace)

OpenClaw Setup (Recommended)

OpenClaw is the primary platform for this skill. It uses workspace-based prompt injection with automatic skill loading.

Installation

Via ClawdHub (recommended):

clawdhub install self-improving-agent

Manual:

git clone https://github.com/peterskoett/self-improving-agent.git ~/.openclaw/skills/self-improving-agent

Workspace Structure

OpenClaw injects these files into every session:

~/.openclaw/workspace/
├── AGENTS.md          # Multi-agent workflows, delegation patterns
├── SOUL.md            # Behavioral guidelines, personality, principles
├── TOOLS.md           # Tool capabilities, integration gotchas
├── MEMORY.md          # Long-term memory (main session only)
├── memory/            # Daily memory files
│   └── YYYY-MM-DD.md
└── .learnings/        # This skill's log files
    ├── LEARNINGS.md
    ├── ERRORS.md
    └── FEATURE_REQUESTS.md

Create Learning Files

mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/workspace/.learnings

Then create the log files (or copy from assets/):

  • LEARNINGS.md — corrections, knowledge gaps, best practices
  • ERRORS.md — command failures, exceptions
  • FEATURE_REQUESTS.md — user-requested capabilities

Promotion Targets

When learnings prove broadly applicable, promote them to workspace files:

Learning Type Promote To Example
Behavioral patterns SOUL.md "Be concise, avoid disclaimers"
Workflow improvements AGENTS.md "Spawn sub-agents for long tasks"
Tool gotchas TOOLS.md "Git push needs auth configured first"

Inter-Session Communication

OpenClaw provides tools to share learnings across sessions:

  • sessions_list — View active/recent sessions
  • sessions_history — Read another session's transcript
  • sessions_send — Send a learning to another session
  • sessions_spawn — Spawn a sub-agent for background work

Optional: Enable Hook

For automatic reminders at session start:

# Copy hook to OpenClaw hooks directory
cp -r hooks/openclaw ~/.openclaw/hooks/self-improvement

# Enable it
openclaw hooks enable self-improvement

See references/openclaw-integration.md for complete details.


Generic Setup (Other Agents)

For Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, or other agents, create .learnings/ in your project:

mkdir -p .learnings

Copy templates from assets/ or create files with headers.

Logging Format

Learning Entry

Append to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md:

## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: low | medium | high | critical
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Summary
One-line description of what was learned

### Details
Full context: what happened, what was wrong, what's correct

### Suggested Action
Specific fix or improvement to make

### Metadata
- Source: conversation | error | user_feedback
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- Tags: tag1, tag2
- See Also: LRN-20250110-001 (if related to existing entry)

---

Error Entry

Append to .learnings/ERRORS.md:

## [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX] skill_or_command_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: high
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Summary
Brief description of what failed

### Error

Actual error message or output


### Context
- Command/operation attempted
- Input or parameters used
- Environment details if relevant

### Suggested Fix
If identifiable, what might resolve this

### Metadata
- Reproducible: yes | no | unknown
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- See Also: ERR-20250110-001 (if recurring)

---

Feature Request Entry

Append to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md:

## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Requested Capability
What the user wanted to do

### User Context
Why they needed it, what problem they're solving

### Complexity Estimate
simple | medium | complex

### Suggested Implementation
How this could be built, what it might extend

### Metadata
- Frequency: first_time | recurring
- Related Features: existing_feature_name

---

ID Generation

Format: TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX

  • TYPE: LRN (learning), ERR (error), FEAT (feature)
  • YYYYMMDD: Current date
  • XXX: Sequential number or random 3 chars (e.g., 001, A7B)

Examples: LRN-20250115-001, ERR-20250115-A3F, FEAT-20250115-002

Resolving Entries

When an issue is fixed, update the entry:

  1. Change **Status**: pending**Status**: resolved
  2. Add resolution block after Metadata:
### Resolution
- **Resolved**: 2025-01-16T09:00:00Z
- **Commit/PR**: abc123 or #42
- **Notes**: Brief description of what was done

Other status values:

  • in_progress - Actively being worked on
  • wont_fix - Decided not to address (add reason in Resolution notes)
  • promoted - Elevated to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md

Promoting to Project Memory

When a learning is broadly applicable (not a one-off fix), promote it to permanent project memory.

When to Promote

  • Learning applies across multiple files/features
  • Knowledge any contributor (human or AI) should know
  • Prevents recurring mistakes
  • Documents project-specific conventions

Promotion Targets

Target What Belongs There
CLAUDE.md Project facts, conventions, gotchas for all Claude interactions
AGENTS.md Agent-specific workflows, tool usage patterns, automation rules
.github/copilot-instructions.md Project context and conventions for GitHub Copilot
SOUL.md Behavioral guidelines, communication style, principles (OpenClaw workspace)
TOOLS.md Tool capabilities, usage patterns, integration gotchas (OpenClaw workspace)

How to Promote

  1. Distill the learning into a concise rule or fact
  2. Add to appropriate section in target file (create file if needed)
  3. Update original entry:
    • Change **Status**: pending**Status**: promoted
    • Add **Promoted**: CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md

Promotion Examples

Learning (verbose):

Project uses pnpm workspaces. Attempted npm install but failed. Lock file is pnpm-lock.yaml. Must use pnpm install.

In CLAUDE.md (concise):

## Build & Dependencies
- Package manager: pnpm (not npm) - use `pnpm install`

Learning (verbose):

When modifying API endpoints, must regenerate TypeScript client. Forgetting this causes type mismatches at runtime.

In AGENTS.md (actionable):

## After API Changes
1. Regenerate client: `pnpm run generate:api`
2. Check for type errors: `pnpm tsc --noEmit`

Recurring Pattern Detection

If logging something similar to an existing entry:

  1. Search first: grep -r "keyword" .learnings/
  2. Link entries: Add **See Also**: ERR-20250110-001 in Metadata
  3. Bump priority if issue keeps recurring
  4. Consider systemic fix: Recurring issues often indicate:
    • Missing documentation (→ promote to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md)
    • Missing automation (→ add to AGENTS.md)
    • Architectural problem (→ create tech debt ticket)

Periodic Review

Review .learnings/ at natural breakpoints:

When to Review

  • Before starting a new major task
  • After completing a feature
  • When working in an area with past learnings
  • Weekly during active development

Quick Status Check

# Count pending items
grep -h "Status\*\*: pending" .learnings/*.md | wc -l

# List pending high-priority items
grep -B5 "Priority\*\*: high" .learnings/*.md | grep "^## \["

# Find learnings for a specific area
grep -l "Area\*\*: backend" .learnings/*.md

Review Actions

  • Resolve fixed items
  • Promote applicable learnings
  • Link related entries
  • Escalate recurring issues

Detection Triggers

Automatically log when you notice:

Corrections (→ learning with correction category):

  • "No, that's not right..."
  • "Actually, it should be..."
  • "You're wrong about..."
  • "That's outdated..."

Feature Requests (→ feature request):

  • "Can you also..."
  • "I wish you could..."
  • "Is there a way to..."
  • "Why can't you..."

Knowledge Gaps (→ learning with knowledge_gap category):

  • User provides information you didn't know
  • Documentation you referenced is outdated
  • API behavior differs from your understanding

Errors (→ error entry):

  • Command returns non-zero exit code
  • Exception or stack trace
  • Unexpected output or behavior
  • Timeout or connection failure

Priority Guidelines

Priority When to Use
critical Blocks core functionality, data loss risk, security issue
high Significant impact, affects common workflows, recurring issue
medium Moderate impact, workaround exists
low Minor inconvenience, edge case, nice-to-have

Area Tags

Use to filter learnings by codebase region:

Area Scope
frontend UI, components, client-side code
backend API, services, server-side code
infra CI/CD, deployment, Docker, cloud
tests Test files, testing utilities, coverage
docs Documentation, comments, READMEs
config Configuration files, environment, settings

Best Practices

  1. Log immediately - context is freshest right after the issue
  2. Be specific - future agents need to understand quickly
  3. Include reproduction steps - especially for errors
  4. Link related files - makes fixes easier
  5. Suggest concrete fixes - not just "investigate"
  6. Use consistent categories - enables filtering
  7. Promote aggressively
how to use self-improvement

How to use self-improvement on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add self-improvement
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills --skill self-improvement

The skills CLI fetches self-improvement from GitHub repository sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/self-improvement

Reload or restart Cursor to activate self-improvement. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /self-improvement) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.772 reviews
  • Mei Park· Dec 24, 2024

    self-improvement is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Aisha Verma· Dec 20, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: self-improvement is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Meera White· Dec 16, 2024

    Useful defaults in self-improvement — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Mei Reddy· Dec 16, 2024

    Registry listing for self-improvement matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 12, 2024

    We added self-improvement from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Mei Torres· Dec 12, 2024

    self-improvement has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • William Rahman· Dec 8, 2024

    Keeps context tight: self-improvement is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Camila Patel· Nov 27, 2024

    self-improvement is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Kaira Ghosh· Nov 15, 2024

    Keeps context tight: self-improvement is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 11, 2024

    self-improvement fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

showing 1-10 of 72

1 / 8