ontology

sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills --skill ontology
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Typed knowledge graph for structured agent memory, entity management, and cross-skill state sharing.

  • Supports 15+ core entity types (Person, Project, Task, Event, Document, etc.) with typed properties, relations, and constraint validation
  • Enables graph queries, traversals, and dependency tracking; model multi-step plans as sequences of validated graph transformations
  • Stores data as append-only JSONL by default; schema-driven validation prevents invalid mutations and enforces cardinal
skill.md

Ontology

A typed vocabulary + constraint system for representing knowledge as a verifiable graph.

Core Concept

Everything is an entity with a type, properties, and relations to other entities. Every mutation is validated against type constraints before committing.

Entity: { id, type, properties, relations, created, updated }
Relation: { from_id, relation_type, to_id, properties }

When to Use

Trigger Action
"Remember that..." Create/update entity
"What do I know about X?" Query graph
"Link X to Y" Create relation
"Show all tasks for project Z" Graph traversal
"What depends on X?" Dependency query
Planning multi-step work Model as graph transformations
Skill needs shared state Read/write ontology objects

Core Types

# Agents & People
Person: { name, email?, phone?, notes? }
Organization: { name, type?, members[] }

# Work
Project: { name, status, goals[], owner? }
Task: { title, status, due?, priority?, assignee?, blockers[] }
Goal: { description, target_date?, metrics[] }

# Time & Place
Event: { title, start, end?, location?, attendees[], recurrence? }
Location: { name, address?, coordinates? }

# Information
Document: { title, path?, url?, summary? }
Message: { content, sender, recipients[], thread? }
Thread: { subject, participants[], messages[] }
Note: { content, tags[], refs[] }

# Resources
Account: { service, username, credential_ref? }
Device: { name, type, identifiers[] }
Credential: { service, secret_ref }  # Never store secrets directly

# Meta
Action: { type, target, timestamp, outcome? }
Policy: { scope, rule, enforcement }

Storage

Default: memory/ontology/graph.jsonl

{"op":"create","entity":{"id":"p_001","type":"Person","properties":{"name":"Alice"}}}
{"op":"create","entity":{"id":"proj_001","type":"Project","properties":{"name":"Website Redesign","status":"active"}}}
{"op":"relate","from":"proj_001","rel":"has_owner","to":"p_001"}

Query via scripts or direct file ops. For complex graphs, migrate to SQLite.

Workflows

Create Entity

python3 scripts/ontology.py create --type Person --props '{"name":"Alice","email":"[email protected]"}'

Query

python3 scripts/ontology.py query --type Task --where '{"status":"open"}'
python3 scripts/ontology.py get --id task_001
python3 scripts/ontology.py related --id proj_001 --rel has_task

Link Entities

python3 scripts/ontology.py relate --from proj_001 --rel has_task --to task_001

Validate

python3 scripts/ontology.py validate  # Check all constraints

Constraints

Define in memory/ontology/schema.yaml:

types:
  Task:
    required: [title, status]
    status_enum: [open, in_progress, blocked, done]
  
  Event:
    required: [title, start]
    validate: "end >= start if end exists"

  Credential:
    required: [service, secret_ref]
    forbidden_properties: [password, secret, token]  # Force indirection

relations:
  has_owner:
    from_types: [Project, Task]
    to_types: [Person]
    cardinality: many_to_one
  
  blocks:
    from_types: [Task]
    to_types: [Task]
    acyclic: true  # No circular dependencies

Skill Contract

Skills that use ontology should declare:

# In SKILL.md frontmatter or header
ontology:
  reads: [Task, Project, Person]
  writes: [Task, Action]
  preconditions:
    - "Task.assignee must exist"
  postconditions:
    - "Created Task has status=open"

Planning as Graph Transformation

Model multi-step plans as a sequence of graph operations:

Plan: "Schedule team meeting and create follow-up tasks"

1. CREATE Event { title: "Team Sync", attendees: [p_001, p_002] }
2. RELATE Event -> has_project -> proj_001
3. CREATE Task { title: "Prepare agenda", assignee: p_001 }
4. RELATE Task -> for_event -> event_001
5. CREATE Task { title: "Send summary", assignee: p_001, blockers: [task_001] }

Each step is validated before execution. Rollback on constraint violation.

Integration Patterns

With Causal Inference

Log ontology mutations as causal actions:

# When creating/updating entities, also log to causal action log
action = {
    "action": "create_entity",
    "domain": "ontology", 
    "context": {"type": "Task", "project": "proj_001"},
    "outcome": "created"
}

Cross-Skill Communication

# Email skill creates commitment
commitment = ontology.create("Commitment", {
    "source_message": msg_id,
    "description": "Send report by Friday",
    "due": "2026-01-31"
})

# Task skill picks it up
tasks = ontology.query("Commitment", {"status": "pending"})
for c in tasks:
    ontology.create("Task", {
        "title": c.description,
        "due": c.due,
        "source": c.id
    })

Quick Start

# Initialize ontology storage
mkdir -p memory/ontology
touch memory/ontology/graph.jsonl

# Create schema (optional but recommended)
cat > memory/ontology/schema.yaml << 'EOF'
types:
  Task:
    required: [title, status]
  Project:
    required: [name]
  Person:
    required: [name]
EOF

# Start using
python3 scripts/ontology.py create --type Person --props '{"name":"Alice"}'
python3 scripts/ontology.py list 
how to use ontology

How to use ontology on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add ontology
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills --skill ontology

The skills CLI fetches ontology from GitHub repository sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/ontology

Reload or restart Cursor to activate ontology. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /ontology) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.743 reviews
  • Aanya Gupta· Dec 20, 2024

    Useful defaults in ontology — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 4, 2024

    ontology is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Layla Harris· Dec 4, 2024

    Registry listing for ontology matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Piyush G· Nov 23, 2024

    Keeps context tight: ontology is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Ama Martin· Nov 23, 2024

    ontology fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Aarav Ndlovu· Nov 11, 2024

    I recommend ontology for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Shikha Mishra· Oct 14, 2024

    Registry listing for ontology matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Noor Robinson· Oct 14, 2024

    ontology is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Aarav Brown· Oct 2, 2024

    ontology reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Aanya Gill· Sep 21, 2024

    Useful defaults in ontology — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 43

1 / 5