livewire-development

spatie/freek.dev · updated Apr 15, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/spatie/freek.dev --skill livewire-development
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Activate this skill when:

skill.md

Livewire Development

When to Apply

Activate this skill when:

  • Creating or modifying Livewire components
  • Using wire: directives (model, click, loading, sort, intersect)
  • Implementing islands or async actions
  • Writing Livewire component tests

Documentation

Use search-docs for detailed Livewire 4 patterns and documentation.

Basic Usage

Creating Components

Single-file component (default in v4)

{{ $assist->artisanCommand('make:livewire create-post') }}

Multi-file component

{{ $assist->artisanCommand('make:livewire create-post --mfc') }}

Class-based component (v3 style)

{{ $assist->artisanCommand('make:livewire create-post --class') }}

With namespace

{{ $assist->artisanCommand('make:livewire Posts/CreatePost') }}

Converting Between Formats

Use php artisan livewire:convert create-post to convert between single-file, multi-file, and class-based formats.

Component Format Reference

Format Flag Structure
Single-file (SFC) default PHP + Blade in one file
Multi-file (MFC) --mfc Separate PHP class, Blade, JS, tests
Class-based --class Traditional v3 style class
View-based ⚡ prefix Blade-only with functional state

Single-File Component Example

Livewire 4 Specifics

Key Changes From Livewire 3

These things changed in Livewire 4, but may not have been updated in this application. Verify this application's setup to ensure you follow existing conventions.

  • Use Route::livewire() for full-page components; config keys renamed: layoutcomponent_layout, lazy_placeholdercomponent_placeholder.
  • wire:model now ignores child events by default (use wire:model.deep for old behavior); wire:scroll renamed to wire:navigate:scroll.
  • Component tags must be properly closed; wire:transition now uses View Transitions API (modifiers removed).
  • JavaScript: $wire.$js('name', fn)$wire.$js.name = fn; commit/request hooks → interceptMessage()/interceptRequest().

New Features

  • Component formats: single-file (SFC), multi-file (MFC), view-based components.
  • Islands (@island) for isolated updates; async actions (wire:click.async, #[Async]) for parallel execution.
  • Deferred/bundled loading: defer, lazy.bundle for optimized component loading.
Feature Usage Purpose
Islands @island(name: 'stats') Isolated update regions
Async wire:click.async or #[Async] Non-blocking actions
Deferred defer attribute Load after page render
Bundled lazy.bundle Load multiple together

New Directives

  • wire:sort, wire:intersect, wire:ref, .renderless, .preserve-scroll are available for use.
  • data-loading attribute automatically added to elements triggering network requests.
Directive Purpose
wire:sort Drag-and-drop sorting
wire:intersect Viewport intersection detection
wire:ref Element references for JS
.renderless Component without rendering
.preserve-scroll Preserve scroll position

Best Practices

  • Always use wire:key in loops
  • Use wire:loading for loading states
  • Use wire:model.live for instant updates (default is debounced)
  • Validate and authorize in actions (treat like HTTP requests)

Configuration

  • smart_wire_keys defaults to true; new configs: component_locations, component_namespaces, make_command, csp_safe.

Alpine & JavaScript

  • wire:transition uses browser View Transitions API; $errors and $intercept magic properties available.
  • Non-blocking wire:poll and parallel wire:model.live updates improve performance.

For interceptors and hooks, see reference/javascript-hooks.md.

Testing

Livewire::test(Counter::class) ->assertSet('count', 0) ->call('increment') ->assertSet('count', 1);

Verification

  1. Browser console: Check for JS errors
  2. Network tab: Verify Livewire requests return 200
  3. Ensure wire:key on all @foreach loops

Common Pitfalls

  • Missing wire:key in loops → unexpected re-rendering
  • Expecting wire:model real-time → use wire:model.live
  • Unclosed component tags → syntax errors in v4
  • Using deprecated config keys or JS hooks
  • Including Alpine.js separately (already bundled in Livewire 4)
how to use livewire-development

How to use livewire-development on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add livewire-development
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/spatie/freek.dev --skill livewire-development

The skills CLI fetches livewire-development from GitHub repository spatie/freek.dev and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/livewire-development

Reload or restart Cursor to activate livewire-development. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /livewire-development) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.658 reviews
  • Luis Martinez· Dec 28, 2024

    livewire-development is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Alexander Mehta· Dec 28, 2024

    livewire-development fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Alexander Yang· Dec 16, 2024

    livewire-development is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Dev Srinivasan· Dec 12, 2024

    livewire-development reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 4, 2024

    Keeps context tight: livewire-development is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 23, 2024

    livewire-development has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sofia Sethi· Nov 19, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: livewire-development is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Naina Ramirez· Nov 19, 2024

    Registry listing for livewire-development matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Anika Yang· Nov 11, 2024

    Useful defaults in livewire-development — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Alexander Verma· Nov 7, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: livewire-development is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 58

1 / 6